No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Correlsense SharePath vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Correlsense SharePath
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
64th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
268
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Correlsense SharePath is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Splunk AppDynamics4.2%
Correlsense SharePath0.7%
Other95.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

it_user394539 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Capacity and Performance Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications. It's hugely configurable in terms of how the data is presented and categorized. It's reliable, with low administration overheads once up and running It provides customer insight and behaviour. It's improved our…
Shamim Alsharif - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance Test Engineer at TANIM CONSULTING, LLC
Real-time monitoring has improved our banking API performance and supports detailed business transaction analysis
The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related. It's real-time monitoring of performance of each of the components, which is what we need and use all the time. It's highly effective, I would say. Infrastructure visibility, transaction monitoring, to check the actual user experience in terms of the response time, MRT and all those things. We do the component monitoring like the API performance and the connections and all those things, but we also do the business process monitoring and business transaction monitoring.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications."
"We were able to correct problems, which led to an increase in availability, time savings, and performance for our solutions."
"AppDynamics has become the go-to tool for issue identification."
"The solution provides good overall application performance and transaction errors which reflect backend health."
"The time saved is significant as we have gone from four hours to one hour, which means we are saving a lot of time."
"The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications."
"I think the most important thing is the end-to-end view that you get of all of your servers when you set it up."
"It was a game changer right out the door."
"This practice has transitioned our testers to engineers."
 

Cons

"Scaling out requires the added cost of multiple servers, and we don't have plans to do that."
"We want a single monitoring tool; we don't want thousands in there because right now I am discarding analytics monitoring tools."
"It could be more user-friendly for beginners."
"The biggest room for improvement is related to maintenance of the solution."
"Its resiliency can be improved. We're told that the best we can do with an on-prem solution is to have a hot standby that requires a manual switchover. So, it is a do-it-yourself Ikea model of maintaining data consistency between two servers, without having low balance or failover considerations for an on-prem solution."
"The day-to-day activities should be less complicated so that anyone can manage it."
"Based on the user experience feedback that we have had, I think that the most important thing to improve is the availability of the SaaS, the cloud environment."
"The only thing is that maybe it collects too much right away. There's a lot of noise."
"What could be improved in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is for the synthetic jobs or synthetic agents, in particular, you can't do a lot of tests with just one agent. You have to install a lot of agents if you want to do more tests, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. Another area for improvement in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is that you're only able to see basic metrics in the absence of server or database visibility. For the SaaS version of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring, my team just downloaded then installed the extension in an application in Azure to see the application on the controller, so if this can be done in the on-premise version of the solution as well, without needing to install the agent on the machine, then it would make AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring better. Currently, the .NET agent consumes the CPU or memory and clients usually raise this issue with my team, so it would be good if the on-premises version doesn't require agent installation on the machine. Another functionality I'd like to see in the next release of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is for it to receive updates from the file config without needing to reset IIS because right now when you do a modification in IIS, you have to restart IIS. When you add a service to the agent config, you have to restart IIS. For the product server, it's not possible to reset IIS after you make changes to the config file, so if this could be improved, then it would make AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring a better solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We do not have any issues with the price."
"The license for AppDynamics is procured by our customers."
"Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace was good."
"AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."
"I rate AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring's pricing as seven out of ten. Mobile monitoring is paid based on the number of instances utilizing the mobile monitoring service, which increases as the scale grows. Consequently, your mobile user count can proportionally surpass all other applications."
"AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors."
"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."
"AppDynamics offers a yearly basis license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business57
Midsize Enterprise37
Large Enterprise200
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is highly expensive. Our company pays for the solution on a yearly basis, if we don't add new modules or features to the license, we need ...
 

Also Known As

SharePath
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.