Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Crowdcurity vs HackerOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Crowdcurity
Ranking in Bug Bounty Platforms
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HackerOne
Ranking in Bug Bounty Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (19th), Vulnerability Management (27th), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (11th), AI Observability (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Bug Bounty Platforms category, the mindshare of Crowdcurity is 3.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HackerOne is 38.3%, down from 40.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Bug Bounty Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HackerOne38.3%
Crowdcurity3.6%
Other58.1%
Bug Bounty Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use Crowdcurity?
Leave a review
Ruphus Muita - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited
Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering
I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Bug Bounty Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?
I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.
What needs improvement with HackerOne?
I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they a...
What is your primary use case for HackerOne?
My main use case for HackerOne is mostly for submitting bugs. I get into the programs listed there, find one that is suitable for me, do my penetration testing on the systems, try to bypass some co...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Optimizely, LendInvest, Auctionata, Nexmo, Egnyte, Blockchain.info, Circle, Weebly, BillGuard, Paysafe, Soonr, DoSomething, BlockScore
Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense
Find out what your peers are saying about Bugcrowd vs. HackerOne and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.