Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations comparison

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.4%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud	0.7%
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	1.4%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2406663

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Effective risk response, easy deployment, and enhanced security

They use Datto EDR as part of the solutions that we supply Datto EDR has helped reduce overall security incident costs by fifteen percent. The ease of deployment has been good, and the responsiveness of the application to risks has been quite effective. The inclusion of web filtering would be…

Read full review

Zunair Aftab

Supports Engineer at Rawad IT Solutions

Security features excel while management tools face challenges

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has proven to be a robust and comprehensive solution for endpoint protection. So far, no major negative features have been observed. However, email security integration with Microsoft 365 has room for improvement. In a recent real-world incident, a company received 10 phishing emails, of which only three were blocked by the system. Enhancing detection accuracy to block 7 or more would significantly improve trust and effectiveness. With the on-premises version, there's a known issue where assigning a device to a new group results in it being auto-assigned back to the previous group. Fixing this bug would greatly streamline device management. Additionally, in the cloud version, once a device is assigned to a user, it cannot be reassigned without deleting the user or the device entirely. It would be far more user-friendly if the platform allowed simple reassignment or de-assignment, returning the device to an "unassigned" state. As for automated behavioral analysis, while current functionality is based on machine learning, upgrading to true AI-powered detection could bring substantial improvements. Ideally, the system should proactively flag potential threats, and offer administrators the option to either allow or block applications based on intelligent risk analysis

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

"The stability of this product is very good."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription."

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"Cortex XDR alerts us on the dashboard when there's a threat, which allows us to restrict that user and helps secure our infrastructure."

"One thing that I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it is detecting all the suspicious or malicious binaries, and it has integration with Palo Alto Firewall."

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent."

"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable feature of Datto EDR is the visibility of the endpoints."

"The ease of deployment has been good."

"Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is a perfect product for endpoint security."

"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."

"I would say that Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is one of the best, very effective software because of its vulnerability assessment and threat assessments."

"In terms of software performance, it has been effective in providing good security."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a very good solution for endpoint protection."

"The standout features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud include its cloud-based console and the simplicity of managing endpoints."

"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pros

Cons

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around. In the hotel industry, we use a different type of data versus Oracle and SQL. By default, there are some policies which stop us from running properly. Because of this, the support level is also not that strong. We have to wait to get a results."

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"The downside to the solution is that there are a large number of false positives."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously."

"The solution should allow the automation of playbooks."

"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad."

"The solution could improve by having more deployment methods."

"The inclusion of web filtering would be good."

"Certain shortcomings in the anti-ransomware part of the solution need improvement. XDR and MDR, along with threat hunting, a big step in cybersecurity today, need improvement."

"Its high CPU usage also slows down devices, particularly those with lower specifications like Core i3."

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"Kaspersky's global ranking has been on the decline."

"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."

"Sometimes, the tool consumes a lot of resources from the endpoints, making it an area of concern where improvements are required since it currently consumes a little bit of RAM."

"Kaspersky's cloud solution should be improved because the on-premises features are unavailable in the cloud."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was fine."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is not an expensive solution."

"There is an annual license to use this solution. The price of the solution can be expensive depending on the company."

"The product is averagely priced."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"The platform is expensive."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infocyte HUNT?

The price is quite low. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a four, meaning it is quite cheap.

What needs improvement with Infocyte HUNT?

The inclusion of web filtering would be good.

What is your primary use case for Infocyte HUNT?

They use Datto EDR as part of the solutions that we supply.

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

No advise, its pretty simple

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

I cannot find another problem.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

More Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Infocyte HUNT

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

With Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) you can detect and respond to advanced threats. Datto EDR is an easy to use cloud based EDR solution that's designed for Managed Service Providers (MSPs).

datto

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.

This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?

Self-Protection Mechanism: Defends against unauthorized changes and ensure operation stability.
Malware Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats with high accuracy.
Cloud-Based Endpoint Management: Simplifies management across devices with a centralized console.
Microsoft Office 365 Integration: Enhances security and productivity in collaborative environments.
Vulnerability Assessments: Provides insights into potential security weaknesses.
Anti-Phishing & Anti-Malware: Protects against harmful emails and web content.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Performance: Consistent security measures against complex threats.
Detailed Reporting: Offers in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Covers a wide range of threats including malware and phishing.
Integration Capability: Easily integrates with other security solutions and platforms.

Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Check Point Software, PwC, Grant Thornton, AT&T, DHL, U.S. Department of Defense

Information Not Available

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations