Dell Avamar vs Quantum DXi Series comparison

Dell Technologies and Quantum are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Dell Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quantum is ranked #65. Dell Technologies holds a 2.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quantum’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Quantum users who would recommend it.

Dell Avamar

Read 90 Dell Avamar reviews

5,396 Views
4,910 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Quantum DXi Series

Read 2 Quantum DXi Series reviews

1,546 Views
835 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Dell Avamar

Quantum DXi Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Dell Avamar and Quantum DXi Series compete in the data storage and protection market. Quantum DXi Series appears superior due to its features and is viewed as worth the price despite higher costs.

Features: Dell Avamar offers reliable deduplication, efficient backup processes, and secure data replication. Quantum DXi Series provides scalability, comprehensive data management, and robust data handling capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Dell Avamar needs improved scalability, more flexible storage options, and enhanced user interface. Quantum DXi Series requires better integration with other systems, more intuitive management tools, and faster data recovery times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell Avamar is straightforward to deploy but can be complex initially without expert help. Quantum DXi Series generally offers a smooth deployment experience with consistent and dedicated customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Dell Avamar is cost-effective with good ROI due to lower setup costs and efficient data reduction. Quantum DXi Series is more expensive initially but justified by superior long-term performance and a comprehensive feature set, providing better ROI for higher upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell Avamar

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

9th

Ranking in Deduplication Software

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quantum DXi Series

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

65th

Ranking in Deduplication Software

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Dell Avamar is 2.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quantum DXi Series is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Dell Avamar	2.0%
Quantum DXi Series	0.7%
Other	97.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

SamuelThomas

Consultant at Key Information Technology L.L.C.

Have supported critical environments despite room for improvement in legacy backup options

It is very efficient in cyber resilience. Deduplication, automation, and everything is very efficient. It is multi-cloud enabled and has broad protections. The software delivers flexible and efficient backup and recovery options through its cyber resiliency features. Dell PowerProtect Manager provides insights in managing backup processes. Its encryption mechanisms are very efficient, helping to secure sensitive data. Its integration with Dell EMC Data Domain is very good. It is easy to integrate with Data Domain. Multi-cloud options are enabled, and backup in cloud options exist in Dell Avamar.

Read full review

reviewer2301564

Expert Backup at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

A virtual deduplication backup appliance that protects physical and virtual data across remote sites, the datacenter and cloud deployments

Given its ease of use and management, I believe there are no specific caveats that users need to be aware of during the setup of DXRIS for backups. The process was straightforward, and I did not encounter any challenges or issues. As for a rating on a scale of one to ten, with one being the worst and ten being the best, I would rate the Quantum DXI Series a nine. My deduction is primarily influenced by personal preferences, particularly regarding the user interface and it is a highly commendable system, I would rate it a solid nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a proven track record of good backups without much of a failure ratio. It also has a good backup in terms of the compression ratio."

"It's stable and offers good performance."

"Graphically, it's very user interactive. It's got a very nice interface."

"The most valuable features are image backups and file backups."

"We have a lot of backups, and this tool helps us with the RMAN Backup."

"The function I find most valuable in Dell Avamar is its ability to take differential backups for users. This feature is very effective for both backup and restore operations. We've had multiple cases where we needed to restore files directly from Avamar, and it worked perfectly. The Delta feature, which captures changes in user files, is particularly useful."

"What I found valuable in Dell Avamar is the deduplication feature. I also like that the solution can be integrated with Data Domain."

"The most valuable feature for me in Dell Avamar is the automation, which is good for completion."

More Dell Avamar pros

"While the challenges posed by the difficulties were significant, they prompted the replacement of problematic components, resulting in the resolution of issues. Importantly, there were no substantial ongoing concerns. Regarding the overall performance, it has been consistently excellent."

"I am impressed with the tool's technical alliance with Veeam and Veritas."

Cons

"What would make Dell Avamar better is if it can do faster backups because right now, PowerProtect Data Manager is better in this area with its new UI and a new way to implement backups. Customers nowadays also expect more up-to-date solutions, and this is another area for improvement in Dell Avamar. It's not as up-to-date, so I'm counting on PowerProtect Data Manager, but customers who have Dell Avamar don't want to switch because you don't have as many backup problems in Dell Avamar compared to other solutions. What I'd like to see in the next release of Dell Avamar is an updated UI and a different way to manage backups because currently, backup management is a bit heavy for customers using Dell Avamar."

"Avamar is still competitive because of the way we have deployed it, but we need to diversify and shift away from specific technologies. In addition to hypervisors, virtual machines, and bare metal servers, our customers need protection for Microsoft 365, SaaS, and the public cloud, so we need other technologies in the business to cater to those customers' needs. Those are the enhancements we would want from the Avamar platform, but that's not likely to happen. Dell has PowerProtect and Apex backup services. There are other Dell solutions that we'll use to fulfill our customers' requirements."

"EMC has discontinued their Avamar hardware version. They only advertise the Avamar virtual edition."

"A benefit would be support for either Azure Cool Storage or AWS Glacier."

"The user interface still needs to have some level of improvement. It could be more user-friendly and intuitive."

"Dell Avamar could improve by adding more backup features."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The initial setup is a bit complex and could be simpler."

More Dell Avamar cons

"Perhaps the most notable area for enhancement lies in the web interface for management. The current limitations in LDAP editing capabilities are not addressed in the UI, and I haven't observed any recent updates. It's possible that the new version of the DXI service incorporates improvements in the GUI, but I cannot confirm. While there is room for improvement in the current GUI, it remains a relatively minor issue. Overall, the system is comprehensive, covering aspects such as reports on latency and networking, leaving little room for additional enhancements in those areas."

"The product needs to improve performance while scaling out. It also needs to improve stability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current pricing is generally satisfactory."

"It might not be beneficial to smaller businesses due to its high cost."

"This is a fairly expensive solution. It cost approximately 21,000 each year."

"It is expensive. The maintenance comes with it for five years. So, you buy the whole thing for five years, and your maintenance is included with it, but it's a big chunk of change upfront. We like capital expenses because we can CapEx them. We pay once every five years, so we spend a big chunk of change. You'd have to divide that out by the five years to come up with how much it costs. It's just about three-quarters of a million dollars for five years."

"The cost is high."

"The solution is not expensive for the value one gets."

"When it comes to competition the price is not what is important, it's not the problem."

"It's a very high-end solution and comparable to Rubrik and Cohesity."

More Dell Avamar pricing and cost advice

"I do not oversee this aspect, as pricing is contingent on factors such as volume, technical specifications, and the desired features. Consequently, I lack information on the pricing details and structure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	48

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?

From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC Avamar?

The cost is very significant, and it could be lower.

See all answers

What do you like most about Dell Avamar?

Easy to configure and highly reliable for backup.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Dell Avamar

Compared 37% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell Avamar

Compared 8% of the time

Rubrik vs Dell Avamar

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Dell Avamar

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Dell Avamar

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell Avamar Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 24% of the time

ExaGrid EX Series vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 14% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 14% of the time

ExaGrid EX vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 5% of the time

More Quantum DXi Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar

January 2026

Download Dell Avamar product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download Quantum DXi Series product report

Also Known As

Avamar

DXi Series, Quantum DX

Overview

Dell Avamar data protection software delivers flexible and efficient backup and recovery operations that can scale from daily backup protection for endpoints to high-performance protection for large enterprises with diverse applications and workloads. With application consistent recovery, automation and fast backup and restores, Avamar can help you meet your SLAs and optimize your backup and recovery processes

If you are deploying all or part of your backup environment to the cloud, Avamar enables you to make the most of your cloud investment, enabling replication, disaster recovery and long-term retention for customers using AWS, Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud.

Avamar is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite, which offers comprehensive data protection software applications and tools. Avamar is delivered as software and as a virtual edition.

Dell Technologies

Quantum's DXi series deduplication solutions provides patented variable-length deduplication that not only reduces disk usage and capital expenditures, but also enables efficient data movement across the WAN to other sites and to the cloud.

Quantum

Sample Customers

Dodge County, St Laurence's College, FieldCore (a GE Company), Comanche County Memorial Hospital, Getronics, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions

Nihon Unisys, Nikoyo China

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series

December 2025

Free Report: Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell Avamar vs. Quantum DXi Series report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Deduplication Software vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.