Dell CloudIQ vs Elastic Observability comparison

Dell Technologies and Elastic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Dell Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.5, while Elastic is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8. Dell Technologies holds a 0.9% mindshare in IM, compared to Elastic’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Dell CloudIQ

Read 10 Dell CloudIQ reviews

1,629 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,483 Views
3,393 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Dell CloudIQ and Elastic Observability are products in IT infrastructure and application monitoring. Elastic Observability has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: Dell CloudIQ offers robust analytics for predictive insights, strong customer support, and comprehensive pricing. It empowers IT operations with actionable data. Elastic Observability provides unified visibility across data sources, is scalable, and integrates with various platforms, making it suitable for environments requiring extensive integration.

Room for Improvement: Dell CloudIQ could enhance its integration capabilities, offer more sophisticated predictive analytics features, and improve user interface customization. Elastic Observability might improve initial deployment processes, simplify its complex configuration requirements, and streamline its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell CloudIQ is recognized for its straightforward deployment, which minimizes setup complexity and enhances customer service. Elastic Observability, while more complex in initial setup, compensates with extensive documentation and robust support resources that support a self-service deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Dell CloudIQ offers competitive pricing that focuses on value with its predictive analysis capabilities, contributing to efficient resource management and better long-term ROI. Elastic Observability, although sometimes seen as higher in cost, offers significant ROI through its rich feature set and optimization across complex infrastructures, making it a compelling choice for extensive observability needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Observability

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (10th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.7%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	1.7%
Dell CloudIQ	0.9%
Other	97.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Haseeb Sheikh

Senior Manager Enterprise Solutions at a media company with 201-500 employees

Proactive monitoring has improved availability and capacity reporting for my infrastructure

The current features including availability, performance, and capacity are good enough, and I think more of better alerting along with improved thresholds of alerts should be implemented. It is helpful, but it should also include the capability to detect zero-day attacks if there are any. I think the remediation could have been better. For example, if I am upgrading my firmware or BIOS or firmware of the infrastructure, it should give me exact CVSS scores and remediation data provided against the CVSS scores. I think the Dell CloudIQ app could be more interactive. If there is a possibility that I can open tickets or SRs via the Dell CloudIQ app, that would be a good feature.

Read full review

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"It's convenient because you can access it from a mobile device without needing a laptop."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."

"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"The most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"I think the remediation could have been better."

"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

"One example is the inability to monitor very old databases with the newest version."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The product is not that cheap."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I moved to a new organization where I am also using Dell CloudIQ. I use Dell CloudIQ to monitor PowerStore as well as Dell PowerEdge servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

For performance analytics, I have my own NMS in-house that I use. I have deployed a VApp on-premises with all of the servers and storage integrated, and it sends telemetry data directly to Dell. My...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 29% of the time

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 9% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 6% of the time

VirtualWisdom vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Elastic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

January 2026

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

February 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

CloudIQ is a no cost Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offering that provides a simple monitoring interface for an unlimited number of Unity systems. CloudIQ accesses data in near real time to enable monitoring and troubleshooting for Unity systems.

Dell Technologies

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Sample Customers

North Carolina State University

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2026

Free Report: Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.