Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Nasuni comparison

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Read 37 Nasuni reviews

10,633 Views
2,765 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Nasuni and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines compete in the disaster recovery and data management category. Nasuni seems to have an advantage in unlimited storage capacity and user satisfaction, while Dell RecoverPoint offers superior real-time data protection and VMware integration.

Features: Nasuni offers global file locking, quick site deployment, and continuous file versioning. These features ensure data integrity and scalability, making it a strong option for businesses needing unlimited on-demand storage. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides real-time data protection with precise recovery to specific points, optimizing both local and remote data protection, making it highly suitable for VMware environments.

Room for Improvement: Nasuni users suggest enhancements in replication speed, cloud mirroring, and user-friendliness, along with better documentation and data visibility features. Dell RecoverPoint users seek easier deployment, improved integration with other platforms, and a reduction in setup resources, alongside more cost-effective solutions and enhanced user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni supports hybrid, private, and public clouds as well as on-premises setups. It offers responsive customer support but lacks 24/7 availability. Dell RecoverPoint is mainly on-premises and receives praise for fast, knowledgeable support, though its installation could be more streamlined for a better user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni utilizes a straightforward pricing model tied to terabytes stored and is viewed as cost-effective, especially in reducing backup infrastructure costs and improving data management. Users report strong ROI from reduced labor costs. Dell RecoverPoint is perceived as expensive but offers flexible licensing tied to VMware integration, justifying the cost with its real-time data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: November 2026).

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nasuni

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (14th), Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (30th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 4.7%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines	4.7%
Nasuni	2.5%
Other	92.8%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites

It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.

Read full review

ShailenderSingh1

Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified cloud file storage has simplified global data management and reduced operational overhead

From an admin perspective, Nasuni has various valuable features. The GUI is very good, upgrading is very easy, and DFS is very easily manageable. Compared with other products, the snapshot feature is beneficial because it creates a snapshot every five minutes, allowing me to provide restores very easily to customers. Data protection is enhanced by the fact that Nasuni uses S3 technology to create snapshots every five minutes and enables versioning, so the snapshot is created and I can utilize that snapshot for disaster recovery or restore purposes. I assess the value of global file locking and caching for reducing latency as good, giving it a five out of five.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One person can do the whole implementation, monitoring, and maintenance of the solution."

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any kind of bug or glitch. We haven't experienced crashes."

"The workload can be moved directly if the disaster site is the main site."

"Point-in-time recovery and ease of deployment are valuable."

"It is a point-in-time restore, which is quite handy."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

"Overall the product is really good."

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

"Nasuni has helped decrease capital costs by 66% since we don’t need to buy as much excess capacity."

"We have absolutely seen an ROI, and we are super happy with our ROI."

"The biggest and most impressive thing for us is the operational recovery (OR) and disaster recovery (DR) capabilities that Nasuni has. If a filer goes down, or an ESX server goes down, then we can quickly recover."

"We have one platform to manage all of our data, to see it and to quickly access it, and that is huge."

"Nasuni's unified file storage approach helps my customers manage data across global locations because the unified file version is very supportive, allowing management from a single console without the need to log in on every box."

"The most valuable feature is the storage in that it only keeps the last-used data locally, while everything else is backed up to the cloud. That way, we never really have to worry about file space in each office or the replication to the other file servers for DR."

"I like the unlimited snapshotting."

"It has the ability to do end-user recovery, or a user can simply contact an admin who can perform a recovery from the management console. The versioning has simplified everything. Now we don't have to worry about those components."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"Maybe integration with Kubernetes for OpenShift would be helpful."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

"The solution could improve by being more easier to use. However, once you have used it for a while it becomes easier. Additionally, there could be better support and compatibility with management by having a command-line interface. This would be beneficial for the customers."

"Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover."

"In the next release of this software, I would like to see options that help to decrease the bandwidth required, such as compressing the data."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's actually quite hard. If it could be simplified it might be better for the end user."

"This product is not as easy to use as some other solutions."

"I would like to have the HTML 5 interface working because it is currently not functioning with the VMware environment."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

"Room for improvement would be the speed of replication of new files. I would also like to see cloud mirroring."

"When users from one office save their changes, their peers in another office can see the changes within minutes. Of course, this is an area for constant improvement and we hope that they can still reduce the amount of time it takes to replicate changes."

"The privilege settings need to be more granular, and alerts are an excellent example. If a user doesn't have access to them, they can't see them and access information such as what they may have done wrong, what's there, and when the last sync happened. However, the ability to view alerts also comes with permission to delete them, which is not good, so we need more customization options here."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

"As administrators, we are used to having control equal to managing an on-prem device. In terms of log analysis and other things we want to do, Nasuni has some limitations limitation on what you do on the Nasuni. Nasuni could add some features to the GUI that make administration a little easier. It's tough when I have to move from one filter to another because there is no way to search it. We have to scroll up and down to find the name of it."

"We've had some organizational changes that Nasuni has not been able to keep up with, mainly from a data or file system perspective. Moving a filer from one management console has been a challenge. It lacks the flexibility to move files in and out of the management console. We have six management consoles now, and we're constantly telling Nasuni, "Hey, please allow us to move a filer from management console A to B." They can't do that."

"Its interface design or the graphic user interface design can be slightly tweaked in some areas. Some built-in setup wizards would be very beneficial. Rather than having to go in and configure it by hand, there should be more setup wizards for onboarding new data shares and getting it set up the way you want. I don't know if these are on their roadmap, but I sat down and talked to them about some of the work concerns, some of the things that we liked, and some of the things that we didn't like. They are probably working on that."

"There is some room for improvement when it comes to monitoring. We are not using Nasuni monitoring. We are using our own monitoring through Xenos. Nasuni can provide better monitoring capabilities for us to monitor all the filers and NMC so that we don't have to use a third-party tool."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive product."

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

"There are cheaper forms of storage, but Nasuni is fairly priced for the functionality it offers. I can get basic file shares provisioned in Azure and pay for the storage and the CPU. The overall cost would be much less than Nasuni, but I would need to build the management console and encryption process, so it would cost a lot to develop that kind of functionality."

"The pricing is on par with everybody else, and fair."

"It's cheaper than a lot of alternatives but it's not cheap."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"There are annual costs that we pay for maintaining all of the snapshot history in the cloud. That is the primary cost that we pay. We occasionally buy newer Nasuni appliances or deploy them to new offices when the need occurs. That capital equipment expenses is less than the cost of buying new file storage systems. For the most part, you are trading a CapEx cost of storage equipment for an OpEx cost for management of all the snapshot data in the cloud."

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.

What is your primary use case for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

I was actually just having a quick look to compare some solutions, but we are going to stick with what we currently have, which is Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines ( /products/dell-recoverpoi...

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Disaster Recovery Manager vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 1% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

November 2026

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Download Nasuni product report

October 2026

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides journal-based replication, continuous data protection, and real-time operations, ensuring minimal data loss. Known for its seamless integration with VMware, it simplifies deployment and optimizes workload replication with minimal bandwidth consumption.

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is a comprehensive data management tool that enhances business continuity. Its ability to execute point-in-time recovery ensures flexibility and efficiency in data management. The tool's integration with VMware and its intuitive interface facilitate automatic protection and efficient use of resources. Although improvements in scalability, multi-tenant support, and enhanced cloud usability are necessary, its core functionalities support robust disaster recovery measures and high data availability.

What key features does Dell RecoverPoint offer?

Journal-Based Replication: Ensures precise data recovery with minimal data loss.
Continuous Data Protection: Provides real-time operations to safeguard data consistently.
VMware Integration: Streamlines deployment and improves compatibility with virtual environments.
Point-in-Time Recovery: Offers flexible data management and recovery options.
Automatic VM Protection: Simplifies protection with effortless management.

What benefits can users expect?

Enhanced Data Management: Improve efficiency with precise snapshot selection.
Low Bandwidth Usage: Efficient replication reducing network strain.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies data protection processes with easy navigation.
Effective Disaster Recovery: Ensures high availability and minimal data loss during critical events.

Industries like mining, health, education, and finance use Dell RecoverPoint for critical data protection, supporting tasks such as disaster recovery and site-to-site virtual machine replication. Its capability to replicate data across locations ensures seamless transition and high availability, crucial for operations requiring consistent uptime.

Dell Technologies

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital