Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Nasuni comparison

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

9,184 Views
2,480 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Nasuni and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines compete in the disaster recovery and data management category. Nasuni seems to have an advantage in unlimited storage capacity and user satisfaction, while Dell RecoverPoint offers superior real-time data protection and VMware integration.

Features: Nasuni offers global file locking, quick site deployment, and continuous file versioning. These features ensure data integrity and scalability, making it a strong option for businesses needing unlimited on-demand storage. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides real-time data protection with precise recovery to specific points, optimizing both local and remote data protection, making it highly suitable for VMware environments.

Room for Improvement: Nasuni users suggest enhancements in replication speed, cloud mirroring, and user-friendliness, along with better documentation and data visibility features. Dell RecoverPoint users seek easier deployment, improved integration with other platforms, and a reduction in setup resources, alongside more cost-effective solutions and enhanced user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni supports hybrid, private, and public clouds as well as on-premises setups. It offers responsive customer support but lacks 24/7 availability. Dell RecoverPoint is mainly on-premises and receives praise for fast, knowledgeable support, though its installation could be more streamlined for a better user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni utilizes a straightforward pricing model tied to terabytes stored and is viewed as cost-effective, especially in reducing backup infrastructure costs and improving data management. Users report strong ROI from reduced labor costs. Dell RecoverPoint is perceived as expensive but offers flexible licensing tied to VMware integration, justifying the cost with its real-time data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: August 2026).

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nasuni

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (12th), Cloud Migration (6th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (34th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 5.0%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines	5.0%
Nasuni	2.6%
Other	92.4%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites

It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.

Read full review

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to disaster recovery, this is one of the best solutions there is for EMC products."

"The generalization of the journals allows us to go back in time and choose the snapshot suitable for us. We can grab it as needed."

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any kind of bug or glitch. We haven't experienced crashes."

"One person can do the whole implementation, monitoring, and maintenance of the solution."

"The workload can be moved directly if the disaster site is the main site."

"The technical support from Dell is excellent."

"RecoverPoint replicates workloads fast."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

"I can't say anything other than good things about it."

"Snapshot backup is most valuable. It's quick and easy to use. It's controlled only by an administrator, which is very good. It takes 10 seconds to back up a spreadsheet of three or four megabytes."

"The most valuable feature is that we have redundancy in our data. It's nice to know that it is cached both locally on the filters, as well as stored on that cloud."

"I can see who is logging in on files from all over the globe. For example, if a file is locked, maybe a user in Shanghai has locked files or something, I can see that from the Management Console, then unlock the file."

"Another helpful feature, in addition to restoring a file that was deleted within 24 to 48 hours, is that we have the ability to restore a file or a folder that was deleted, going all the way back to the inception of that file or folder. That means we actually have unlimited backups to the inception point of data with Nasuni."

"Nasuni has replaced multiple data silos and toolsets with a single, global file system."

"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery. We can fully recover a site in two hours."

"With a shift to more remote work during this past year, we deployed a new instance of Nasuni in Azure, which allowed us to be more flexible and support remote work better, something we wouldn't have been able to do with legacy file storage."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"The solution's technical team has enough skills, but the process can get complicated with the time you get connected with the L3 support."

"The price of this product could be lower."

"It should have features for recovering a group of virtual machines and full-scale security. For recovering all the VMs at once, they don't have a GUI option, and we have to use the command line."

"The solution could improve by being more easier to use. However, once you have used it for a while it becomes easier. Additionally, there could be better support and compatibility with management by having a command-line interface. This would be beneficial for the customers."

"Their L1 support is not so good as of now. They have recently outsourced to a company, and they are not doing good."

"Maybe integration with Kubernetes for OpenShift would be helpful."

"The configuration process seems a bit challenging, and the installation takes a bit longer than expected."

"In some cases, the response times could improve, but we haven't had issues with their support."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

"The Nasuni file storage platform doesn't work well when there are a high number of small files. This is the case when a directory structure contains more than 10,000 or 20,000 small files, e.g., 5 KB, 10 KB, or 15 KB. When the user is accessing these files from another geographical location, they might face a slow response or timeouts when connecting to the shares, and then to the files. This is because the file size is small. There is a scope of improvement with this solution when it comes to accessing a large number of small files."

"I suggest Nasuni improve their syslog forwarders to support TCP protocol, as it's more secure than UDP, which is plain text and not protected at all."

"Nasuni recently implemented a health system for filers. However, it needs better visibility because it lacks data and an explanation, or reasoning as to why a particular filer may be unhealthy."

"Its interface design or the graphic user interface design can be slightly tweaked in some areas. Some built-in setup wizards would be very beneficial. Rather than having to go in and configure it by hand, there should be more setup wizards for onboarding new data shares and getting it set up the way you want. I don't know if these are on their roadmap, but I sat down and talked to them about some of the work concerns, some of the things that we liked, and some of the things that we didn't like. They are probably working on that."

"One area that we've recently spoken to Nasuni about is single sign-on. Another is integrating Nasuni with Azure Active Directory. In our particular case, that would allow for third-party consultants to access our Azure Active Directory environment as opposed to coming to our on-premises environment."

"There are some issues with multiple users accessing the same file simultaneously. There would be times when the global file would lock when several people tried to access it, so that could be optimized more."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive."

"I would like to see Nasuni provide the ability to mirror a Nasuni appliance from one site to another. They could maybe have a standby appliance that is mirrored in a different location for disaster recovery purposes. We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover. If we had the ability to have a mirrored appliance, we could flip over to that mirrored device and resume instantly rather than repopulate the local appliance with data from the snapshot history in the cloud. This is another feature that we would really like to see, if possible."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

"This is an expensive product."

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"I would not say it is economically priced, but it is affordable. If you can afford to pay for it, it is worth the money, but it is definitely not overpriced. It is priced about where it needs to be in the market. We were satisfied with the way they did their licensing and how they handled it. I believe they actually license by data size. It is based on how much data is being held on the machine and replicated, and that's completely understandable. So, for us, their pricing was as expected and affordable."

"The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"The pricing is fair. It's an enterprise-level solution so it's not inexpensive... The cost is pretty stable year over year."

"The cost of licensing is negotiated and billed annually per terabyte."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive. When we first took Nasuni out, we were just paying for the service. We got storage at a reduced rate. It has now changed, and they're now more of an all-in-one type of thing. It can be quite expensive, but it works out. Apart from that, licensing-wise, it's very simple."

"Nasuni should provide small-scale licenses, like a 20 TB license. Currently, the smallest is a 30 TB license."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.

What is your primary use case for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

I was actually just having a quick look to compare some solutions, but we are going to stick with what we currently have, which is Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines ( /products/dell-recoverpoi...

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Comparisons

Compared 53% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Disaster Recovery Manager vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

Rubrik vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 1% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

August 2026

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Download Nasuni product report

July 2026

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides journal-based replication, continuous data protection, and real-time operations, ensuring minimal data loss. Known for its seamless integration with VMware, it simplifies deployment and optimizes workload replication with minimal bandwidth consumption.

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is a comprehensive data management tool that enhances business continuity. Its ability to execute point-in-time recovery ensures flexibility and efficiency in data management. The tool's integration with VMware and its intuitive interface facilitate automatic protection and efficient use of resources. Although improvements in scalability, multi-tenant support, and enhanced cloud usability are necessary, its core functionalities support robust disaster recovery measures and high data availability.

What key features does Dell RecoverPoint offer?

Journal-Based Replication: Ensures precise data recovery with minimal data loss.
Continuous Data Protection: Provides real-time operations to safeguard data consistently.
VMware Integration: Streamlines deployment and improves compatibility with virtual environments.
Point-in-Time Recovery: Offers flexible data management and recovery options.
Automatic VM Protection: Simplifies protection with effortless management.

What benefits can users expect?

Enhanced Data Management: Improve efficiency with precise snapshot selection.
Low Bandwidth Usage: Efficient replication reducing network strain.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies data protection processes with easy navigation.
Effective Disaster Recovery: Ensures high availability and minimal data loss during critical events.

Industries like mining, health, education, and finance use Dell RecoverPoint for critical data protection, supporting tasks such as disaster recovery and site-to-site virtual machine replication. Its capability to replicate data across locations ensures seamless transition and high availability, crucial for operations requiring consistent uptime.

Dell Technologies

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital