Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Dell Technologies and NetApp are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Additionally, 100% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote...

Read 7 Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 27 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

3,478 Views
3,339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote...

NetApp SnapMirror

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote...

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp SnapMirror

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user1564485

Storage Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Stable with great features and excellent support

I cannot recall us requesting any changes or new features. It does what we need it to do for the most part. If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult. There could be some new management or monitoring tools added to the solution. Those need a separate license. It would be nice if they were on the basic configuration.

Read full review

LeeLee2

Storage Infrastructure Engineer at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd

Reliable replication has transformed disaster recovery and supports realistic dev-test environments

The best feature NetApp SnapMirror offers is block-level incremental replication, which is the foundation of everything. After the initial baseline transfer, only the changed blocks move across the wire, not entire files or volumes. In a busy storage environment, that is the difference between replication that fits in your backup window and replication that hammers your network all day. NetApp SnapMirror has positively impacted our organization by taking us from a theoretical DR capability, meaning we had a secondary site but had never fully tested a failover, to a validated, tested, documented DR process that we run quarterly, which is a fundamental change in our risk posture. Management can now say with confidence that if the primary site goes down, we recover within two hours with zero data loss on critical systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer Service: Very good. Technical Support: Very good."

"Customer service for this product was top notch."

"The feature of taking snapshots from the replicated volumes has allowed us to use them for DR testing to validate the application consistent point of recovery."

"We've found the support to be very good overall."

"The SRDF solution has improved our disaster recovery RPO to near zero or less than 15 minutes with RTO getting drastically reduced."

"Customer Service: Top notch. Technical Support: Excellent."

"In all the companies in which I have used the product the ease of Disaster Recovery was implemented in such a manner that the risk of a site disaster was mitigated in an efficient way, and it made the migrations of complete data centers to other new data centers at other locations a piece of cake."

"We have migrated data from old and expiring Netapp hardware using Snapmirror, thereby allowing us to decommission the old hardware and save power, maintenance, and cost."

"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."

"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."

"My understanding is that the technical support is good, but we don't need much support because it's working fine."

"Having real-time replication gives us the capability to recover from any data loss as quickly as possible."

"It's a stable solution; it just works."

"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."

"NetApp SnapMirror's compatibility with NetApp products has helped my storage management efforts immensely, as it is part of ONTAP and all architectures based on ONTAP, including ONTAP 8 and 9."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

Cons

"SRDF compared with EMC Recover Point has less capabilities, for ex. CDP (local or remote) is missing, only EMC assets compatibility, as a TCO is more expensive than implementing IBM SVC or EMC VPLEX virtualization and replication (more supported assets)."

"If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult."

"In general, it’s very stable although some time SRDF don’t behave as expected specially if the link is not stable or saturated."

"As of late I have seen the replication drop but this was not due to the SRDF, it was due to the high rate of IO changes on the OS side."

"The main pain point that we experienced is during device creation."

"The main pain point that we experienced is during device creation. For every newly provisioned volume, creating replication relationships between production and DR site, creating snapshots for third copy at DR site, and configuring them in appropriate replication groups and device groups means that there are lot of steps involved and a lot of room for error. There has to be a lot of checks and balances which need to be incorporated to make sure that the solution is set up correctly."

"Our ROI was minimal, because we use it for a cold, disaster recovery method."

"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."

"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."

"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."

"Stability needs improvement."

"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."

"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."

"This process can get out of control sometimes and cause excessive disk utilization."

"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The pricing could be improved."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"The product price is reasonable."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The pricing can be improved."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NetApp SnapMirror is licensed as part of the ONTAP Data Protection bundle, which covers both NetApp SnapMirror and SnapVault. For or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

NetApp SnapMirror can be improved as the initial configuration is not simple; if you are new to NetApp and ONTAP, NetApp SnapMirror concepts take time to get right. Peering clusters, peering SVMs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp SnapMirror?

My main use case for NetApp SnapMirror is disaster recovery replication, primarily, as we have two data centers and NetApp SnapMirror keeps our critical data synchronized between them continuously....

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell RecoverPoint vs Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

Vision Solutions Double-Take vs Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Dell AppSync vs Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

NetApp Snapshot vs Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] Competitors

Vision Solutions Double-Take vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 11% of the time

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 10% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 10% of the time

INFINIDAT InfiniSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 8% of the time

Global-active device vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 8% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

September 2026

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] report

Download Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

September 2026

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Also Known As

No data available

SnapMirror

Overview

The Symmetrix Remote Data Facility family of software is the gold standard for remote replication in mission critical environments. Built for the industry-leading high-end VMAX hardware architecture, the SRDF family of solutions is trusted for disaster recovery and business continuity.

Dell Technologies

NetApp SnapMirror offers efficient data replication and disaster recovery with high data integrity. Supporting various applications, it ensures business continuity with a user-friendly interface and real-time replication.

NetApp SnapMirror integrates seamlessly across diverse IT environments, providing data protection, real-time replication, and business continuity with minimal bandwidth use. Known for simplicity and reliability, it supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid setups, ensuring data integrity even in emergencies. While it excels in flexibility, some seek improved performance, a refined GUI for complex tasks, and better integration. Licensing costs and network support are areas for enhancement.

What are the key features of NetApp SnapMirror?

Data Replication: Ensures efficient real-time data transfer.
Disaster Recovery: Provides robust failover capabilities.
High Data Integrity: Maintains data accuracy and reliability.
Application Support: Compatible with Oracle, SQL, VMware.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies setup and management.
Compression: Reduces bandwidth during data transfer.
Virtualization Integration: Works well with virtual environments.
Bandwidth Management: Optimizes network resource usage.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Business Continuity: Reliable failover options during disruptions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse IT and cloud setups.
Cost Efficiency: Potential for bundled licensing options.
Performance: Fast data transfers with minimal delays.

NetApp SnapMirror is utilized in industries needing robust data replication and disaster recovery solutions, such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. These sectors benefit from its ability to maintain operations during emergencies while supporting complex data environments and ensuring data is consistently synchronized across sites.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Global Security Provider, SSM Health Care, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Shriners, BZWBK, Qatar Islamic Bank, Sudwestrundfunk (SWR)

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.