Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Devo vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations comparison

Devo and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #14. Devo holds a 4.1% mindshare in IOA, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.
Devo
Read 23 Devo reviews
  • 3,513 Views
  • 667 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,820 Views
  • 364 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Devo compete in the IT operations and monitoring space. Devo seems to have the edge due to its comprehensive data management, though ExtraHop offers valuable real-time insights.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides real-time network visibility, behavior analysis, and rapid incident response for threat detection. Devo integrates multiple data sources, offers robust analytical capabilities, and supports comprehensive data management.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop could enhance its data integration and reduce initial setup costs. Devo may improve its personalized customer support and optimize real-time capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop features a straightforward deployment process with reliable client support for setup assistance. Devo also offers seamless deployment but utilizes a cloud-native approach with more of a self-service model, allowing faster setup.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop has a higher initial cost yet delivers ROI through improved security and analytics. Devo's pricing is more competitive, leading to faster return through efficiency in data management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (28th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th), AIOps (21st)
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (73rd), Network Diagnostics (11th), Network Packet Capture (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.1%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 3.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Devo4.1%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations3.5%
Other92.4%
IT Operations Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

FR
Francisco JavierRomo
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation
The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.
Read full review
Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Out West
Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."
"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."
"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."
"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."
"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."
"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."
"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."
"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."
More Devo pros
"It's a must-have solution for large IT Operations, providing the ability to analyze infrastructure and application-related performance and data from the wire perspective."
"ExtraHop came out with the best price, and I think that it gives us a broader view of our network."
"You cannot hide from the wire; all truth lives in the packets, and ExtraHop gets them to talk!"
"ExtraHop is far ahead of anything comparable in the industry."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"We have been able to improve the mean time to resolution by several hours in some cases."
"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations pros
 

Cons

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."
"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."
"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."
"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."
"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."
"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."
"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."
"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."
More Devo cons
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the security part. They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."
"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."
"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."
"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."
"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."
"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."
"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."
More Devo pricing and cost advice
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Devo?
The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Devo?
During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo
Compared 8% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo
Compared 6% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo
Compared 4% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
New Relic vs Devo Logo
New Relic vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
More Devo Competitors
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 9% of the time
LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 7% of the time
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 6% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 5% of the time
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 5% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Devo
March 2026
Devo reportDownload Devo product report
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
March 2026
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
 

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks
 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
March 2026
Free Report: Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Devo vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.