Devo vs GroundWork Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and GroundWork are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while GroundWork is ranked #22. Devo holds a 4.5% mindshare in IOA, compared to GroundWork’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GroundWork users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
1,658 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GroundWork Monitor

Read 1 GroundWork Monitor review

2,585 Views
465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

GroundWork Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Devo and GroundWork Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Palantir and others in IT Operations Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), AIOps (16th)

GroundWork Monitor

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (100th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (74th), Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GroundWork Monitor is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.5%
GroundWork Monitor	1.9%
Other	93.6%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

it_user186582

Sr PC/Client Server Analyst II at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees

It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change.

It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change It would be nice to have a centralized client-settings management. At the moment, the client settings have to be changed individually. I've used it since 2011. The deployment of the new server…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"More than anything, we have seen ROI in the amount of time saved during investigations."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

More Devo pros

"It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write."

Cons

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Technical support could be better."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

More Devo cons

"Deploying an agent leaves much to be desired."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Nagios XI vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More GroundWork Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download GroundWork Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

GWOS

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

GroundWork Monitor streamlines IT infrastructure management with its comprehensive monitoring tools, enhancing efficiency and ensuring system reliability. Designed for professionals, it offers robust insights and simplifies complex environments.

GroundWork Monitor offers a flexible, scalable solution adept at monitoring hybrid IT environments. It effectively combines performance tracking, availability data, and comprehensive reporting to address intricate network infrastructures. Its integration capabilities support seamless operation with existing systems, contributing to optimized IT performance.

What are the key features of GroundWork Monitor?

Hybrid Monitoring: Supports both physical and virtual environments for comprehensive oversight.
Integration: Easily integrates with existing IT systems, supporting diverse technology stacks.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides customizable visuals for a personalized monitoring experience.
Advanced Analytics: Offers deep insights with detailed analytics and reporting functionality.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines IT operations, leading to enhanced productivity.
Cost Reduction: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring.
Scalability: Supports organizational growth with flexible scaling options.
Enhanced Reliability: Minimizes operational risks by providing reliable infrastructure insights.

GroundWork Monitor is utilized across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, where it supports critical operations through continuous monitoring. Its ability to adapt to sector-specific requirements makes it suitable for managing complex IT landscapes in specialized fields.

GroundWork

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Swiss Life, JBFCS, Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Palantir and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.