Devo vs Rapid7 InsightOps comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while Rapid7 is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Rapid7’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightOps

Read 10 Rapid7 InsightOps reviews

2,336 Views
2,219 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Rapid7 InsightOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 InsightOps and Devo compete in the log management and SIEM solutions category. Devo seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature richness, which balances its higher pricing.

Features: Rapid7 InsightOps provides detailed security analytics, seamless integration options, and user-friendly interfaces. Devo offers real-time big data processing, a scalable architecture, and a comprehensive feature set that users prefer for its advanced capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 InsightOps needs to enhance reporting capabilities, performance optimization, and expand its customization options. Devo could improve its intuitive configuration settings, alerting functions, and make minor user interface refinements. Feedback indicates Rapid7 requires more urgent development areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightOps is noted for an intuitive setup process and reliable customer service, facilitating easier deployment. Devo requires more initial effort due to extensive features but benefits from robust support resources, assisting users with complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 InsightOps is viewed as having a competitive pricing model with a quick ROI thanks to seamless integration. Devo's higher pricing is justified by the extensive feature set, offering significant long-term ROI. InsightOps is considered immediately cost-effective while Devo's broader benefits manifest over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

Rapid7 InsightOps

Ranking in Log Management

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightOps is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
Rapid7 InsightOps	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Customization and automation streamline workflows for seamless operations

The features of Rapid7 InsightOps that I have found most valuable are the predefined policies and the use of correlation rules, which are very valuable because they eliminate the need to spend time creating those rules. This feature detects insider threats or compromised credentials by using user behavior analytics, which can collect other compromise indicators. It makes it easier to install and implement this solution because you can run it as normal behavior of users and then switch off to look for the anomalous behavior of any entities, such as laptops and others. In any violation or restricted behavior, the system will notify you that something unusual is occurring. The machine learning algorithms in Rapid7 InsightIDR for threat detection work quite effectively as part of the user entity behavior analytic model, allowing us to focus group normal typical behavior of users and then turn on the rule to spot any unexpected behavior. The automation features of Rapid7 InsightOps are quite satisfactory, as users appreciate these features, especially when integrating with the ticketing system. If something goes wrong, InsightOps will notify the ticketing system to create a ticket and assign it to the responsible person to handle the events found in the infrastructure. The customizable dashboards in Rapid7 InsightOps are quite valuable and interesting because SOC center operators spend most of their time investigating on those dashboards, making them easy to manage. Additionally, we can configure email reports for high-level talks, sending historical data without needing to look online, which is very convenient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"We can ingest virtually any log source, which is much better than our previous solution."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

More Devo pros

"The machine learning algorithms in Rapid7 InsightIDR for threat detection work quite effectively as part of the user entity behavior analytic model, allowing us to focus group normal typical behavior of users and then turn on the rule to spot any unexpected behavior."

"We can save logs as plain text."

"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."

"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."

"Easy to use and spend less time on setups/troubleshooting."

"The log aggregation and research capabilities are definitely what pays for itself."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."

"Once you start using InsightIDR, which works hand in glove with InsightOps, you will feel like you were operating in the stone age before."

More Rapid7 InsightOps pros

Cons

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Technical support could be better."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

More Devo cons

"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."

"There were some difficulties in product setup, but after those issues were resolved, there were no issues."

"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."

"The searching capability, or when you ask real time questions, is pretty decent but it's still not up to par with, say, Splunk."

"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."

"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."

"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightOps?

In my opinion, there are no specific areas of Rapid7 InsightIDR that need improvement because all solutions in the SIEM market, including InsightOps and its competitors, are doing the same things b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightOps?

The usual use cases for Rapid7 InsightOps that I work with are to meet standard requirements such as PCI DSS and ISO standards, collecting data and protecting event logs. Rapid7 InsightOps plays a ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightOps?

The integration capabilities of Rapid7 InsightIDR with other security or IT management tools are quite simple. To integrate with another solution, you just need that solution to push system logs in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightOps

September 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightOps product report

Also Known As

No data available

InsightOps, Logentries

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Rapid7 InsightOps provides asset management, log tracking, and issue resolution with machine learning threat detection, enhancing integration with various systems for real-time monitoring across networks.

Rapid7 InsightOps enables businesses to track assets, manage logs, and resolve issues efficiently. It offers predefined policies, customizable dashboards, and ticketing system integrations. Its endpoint agent ensures real-time monitoring and forensic analysis, aiding incident response and root cause analysis. Log aggregation and search functionality enhance operational efficiency by integrating with SIEM systems. Improvements in search capabilities, interface user-friendliness, and expanded security features could significantly boost user experience and performance.

Why consider Rapid7 InsightOps?

Comprehensive Asset Management: Ensures efficient asset tracking and management across networks.
Efficient Log Tracking: Aggregates log data for enhanced incident response and analysis.
Machine Learning Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify threats and suspicious activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows tailored views for better visualization and analysis.
SIEM Integration: Boosts operational efficiency with seamless SIEM system integration.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Compliance: Meets regulatory standards like PCI DSS and ISO, essential for finance sectors.
Enhanced Security Posture: Proactive threat detection and quick issue resolution improve security.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with integration and real-time monitoring.
Cost Savings: Reduces manual intervention and potential breaches through automation.

Finance sectors extensively implement Rapid7 InsightOps for alert generation, suspicious login detection, and ensuring regulatory compliance. It helps in monitoring IT environments by centralizing log data, analyzing unexpected behavior, data discrepancies, and checking message deliveries, vital for maintaining security and operational standards.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Trimble Navigation Limited

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.