DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Broadcom and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #52, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #61. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

1,640 Views
853 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

400 Views
364 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Goliath Performance Monitor compete in system management and performance monitoring. Goliath Performance Monitor often takes the lead due to its advanced features and deployment simplicity, although DX Unified Infrastructure Management scores higher in pricing and customer support satisfaction.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides comprehensive network and server monitoring, automated problem resolution, and wide device support. Goliath Performance Monitor includes detailed application performance tracking, deep insights into performance issues, and granular diagnostic capabilities.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve its deployment simplicity, enhance its user interface, and offer more real-time analytics. Goliath Performance Monitor might consider reducing initial costs, expanding integration capabilities, and streamlining its feature set for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive documentation and consistent customer service. DX Unified Infrastructure Management may involve a more complex deployment but benefits from a supportive customer service platform known for effective resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for cost-effectiveness and high ROI potential, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Goliath Performance Monitor tends to have a higher setup cost, justified by its advanced features, offering substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

52nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (75th), Server Monitoring (23rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), AIOps (24th)

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."

"The feature that we've found to be very helpful is the way the solution categorizes the devices to identify groups, groups of devices and clusters. This allows us to be aware of their position within the topology."

"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."

"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."

"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."

"Monitoring infrastructure and business applications are the most valuable features."

"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."

"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"Offers a diversity of features."

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

Cons

"The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes."

"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."

"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."

"I'd also like to see more probes. More probes in the sense that we were coming across devices that we're expected to monitor and manage for which, out of the box, there isn't a nice, clean solution. There are probes that are dedicated for certain devices and certain device types, which is great. But then there are times we come across nuanced products that we have to develop our own solution for. There are probes that exist in there that allow us to make a customized solution, but it takes a lot more time."

"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."

"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."

"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."

"CA UIM needs some improvement with performance reporting (if we compare it to CA eHealth)."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

24%

University

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 19% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 11% of the time

NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 8% of the time

Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 8% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 28% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 28% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

August 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

August 2025

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.