Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #73, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,820 Views
  • 1,329 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PRTG Network Monitor
Read 113 PRTG Network Monitor reviews
  • 11,368 Views
  • 7,958 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and PRTG Network Monitor are competing in the network monitoring category. ExtraHop stands out with superior real-time threat detection, while PRTG is notable for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers real-time network traffic analysis, advanced threat detection, and superior analytics for security insights. PRTG Network Monitor includes an extensive sensor array, flexible monitoring options, and strong integration capabilities across various IT components.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop could enhance its integration capabilities and expand its platform adaptability. Additionally, improving cost-effectiveness could make it more appealing to smaller businesses. For PRTG Network Monitor, improving the user interface, expanding the range of pre-configured sensors, and enhancing mobile functionality could provide significant benefits.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop offers seamless deployment with minimal configuration, earning praise for its responsive and expert customer support. PRTG provides an intuitive setup process, complete with clear guidelines and comprehensive support documentation. Its accessible customer service is also highly valued by its user base.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop requires a higher initial investment, justified by its enhanced threat management capabilities that offer significant ROI. PRTG presents a more cost-effective model with flexible licensing options and lower setup costs, delivering substantial value over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
73rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (11th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (6th)
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 3.3%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PRTG Network Monitor3.3%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations0.6%
Other96.1%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Out West
Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review
madhan kumar hs - PeerSpot reviewer
madhan kumar hs
software engineer at Capgemini
Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility
The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ExtraHop came out with the best price, and I think that it gives us a broader view of our network."
"It gives you full 360-degree visibility into your entire infrastructure."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"ExtraHop is far ahead of anything comparable in the industry."
"ExtraHop is far ahead of anything comparable in the industry."
"You cannot hide from the wire; all truth lives in the packets, and ExtraHop gets them to talk!"
"We have been able to improve the mean time to resolution by several hours in some cases."
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations pros
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"We implemented PRTG to get visibility and to get alerts on when CPU is spiking or RAM is spiking."
"PRTG is integrated on Windows."
"Its initial setup process is fast and easy."
"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is real-time monitoring."
"The installation is not that complex."
"PRTG Network Monitor offers a single-pane dashboard where we can monitor all the servers on one single screen, helping our team detect a failed server quickly and saving time that was previously spent checking each server manually, which in turn also reduces downtime."
"The solution has excellent redundant features."
More PRTG Network Monitor pros
 

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"There is room for improvement in the security part. They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations cons
"There's always room for improvement. The high availability feature is good, but it's an area that PRTG could marginally improve. For example, in PRTG, both servers have a different IP, but it would make things a lot easier if they were bound by a single IP."
"The possibility to export the part of the sensor we made would be helpful."
"The thing that we do struggle with a bit is in the historic data. If I want look over 30 days, because it averages out onto one graph, you can't zoom in and drill down information."
"We need something that is more predictive; we would prefer if it wasn't a solution that was corrective and instead offered predictive insights so that we can handle problems before they even occur."
"There's always room for improvement. The high availability feature is good, but it's an area that PRTG could marginally improve."
"The remote probes seem to be a little bit buggy at times. They just stop working or they say they can't communicate."
"For smaller networks, I would recommend this solution. That said, if the network is complex, I would recommend a company evaluates another product instead."
"I would like to see Office 365 monitoring. Essentially, it doesn't do it. I assumed not at all, but apparently it does it slightly. However, due to issues with APIs, they currently don't provide full monitoring for O365."
More PRTG Network Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The pricing is reasonable for the features provided."
"It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible."
"The price of PRTG is reasonable. PRTG's competitors like SolarWinds and ManageEngine charge more for the same functionality."
"One thing I like is that when you buy sensors, it's a perpetual license, so once you buy 2,000 sensors, you've got 2,000 sensors; it's not a recurring cost."
"PRTG Network Monitor is not that expensive, so I like it cost-wise. There's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I would rate the cost of PRTG Network Monitor a two."
"Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years."
"We pay nothing for it. Its 100 sensors have allowed us to put a magnifying glass on some systems, providing an extra layer of detail. Therefore, our outgoing is nothing and our incoming is a lot of useful data that we can react to proactively."
"I rate the price of PRTG Network Monitor an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."
More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user174738
IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business59
Midsize Enterprise19
Large Enterprise50
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
See all answers
What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 9% of the time
LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 7% of the time
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 6% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 5% of the time
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 5% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 5% of the time
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 5% of the time
Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 4% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 3% of the time
SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 3% of the time
More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
March 2026
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
March 2026
PRTG Network Monitor reportDownload PRTG Network Monitor product report
 

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH
 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor
March 2026
Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.