Fidelis Elevate vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fidelis Security and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Threat Deception Platforms category. Additionally, 100% of Fidelis Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2026

Fidelis Elevate and SentinelOne Singularity Hologram compete in cybersecurity. Fidelis holds an advantage in support and pricing, while SentinelOne offers greater value with advanced features.

Features: Fidelis Elevate provides robust endpoint security, effective threat detection, and comprehensive incident response. SentinelOne's AI-powered threat detection, autonomous responses, and proactive security measures make it highly adaptable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fidelis Elevate ensures easy deployment with responsive support. SentinelOne involves a more complex setup but benefits from detailed onboarding and exceptional support services.

Pricing and ROI: Fidelis Elevate offers competitive pricing with clear setup costs, ensuring good ROI. SentinelOne's higher initial cost is justified by substantial long-term ROI from its advanced features and threat impact reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Deception Platforms Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Graham Peck

Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC

Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better

It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Previously, we had to install endpoint protection per machine and then scan and update, but Cortex XDR basically does that centrally and predictably, so we have more time to do day-to-day work rather than spend time chasing those endpoints."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"I like that the product has behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

"The solution helps find bugs, and it is safe to use to prevent attacks by hackers."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is specifically designed to prevent zero-day attacks and is part of an ecosystem of Palo Alto, providing customers with a long-term vision to modify and redesign how security is applied in their company."

"WildFire AI is the best option for this product."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"It is used as our primary in-line IDS/IPS system, replacing FireEye NX, and it catches more, looks at more ports than FireEye NX, and is a scalable appliance, unlike our NX which was saturated and shut itself down."

"The technical support is very helpful."

"There are many valuable features. The NDR gives very good network visibility, and the endpoint module has a great feature called "Live Connect" for remote connections. They also have "Tasks" that can be run on endpoints to gather specific information or retrieve logs."

"The solution's technical support is perfect, so I rate the technical support a ten out of ten"

"The solution is pretty scalable; you buy a lot of features, a known product, and you want it to run in any environment, and it does, so it's scalable enough."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."

Cons

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"It tends to do 99.9% of things. The only thing I'd like is single sign-on authentication into their cloud platform so that my users can be properly authenticated against it."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all."

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Deception Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 2% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Hornetsecurity Advanced Threat Protection vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Acalvio vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

September 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

September 2026

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

August 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Attivo Networks

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Fidelis Elevate offers advanced network and endpoint detection with valuable features such as anomaly detection for reduced false positives, customizable alerts, and efficient reporting, providing comprehensive threat response capabilities across multiple platforms.

Fidelis Elevate is trusted for its robust network visibility and remote connection capabilities. It integrates data across network security platforms, supporting endpoint threat response. Businesses rely on it for in-line IDS/IPS systems that exceed competitors by examining more ports. Its use in anomaly detection and fast data searches is appreciated by those seeking complex solutions covering multiple areas, with endpoint script execution and tools for incident response enhancing its offering.

What important features does Fidelis Elevate offer?

NDR for network visibility: Enhances monitoring and threat detection with deep insights.
Live Connect: Facilitates secure remote connections for troubleshooting and support.
Tasks for information gathering: Streamlines endpoint data collection to support analysis.
Anomaly detection: Minimizes false positives, increasing detection accuracy.
Customizable alerts: Tailors notifications for specific threat scenarios.
Efficient reporting: Enables rapid and detailed data searches.

What benefits and ROI can Fidelis Elevate provide?

Comprehensive threat view: Integrates data for a holistic security perspective.
Enhanced endpoint security: Prevents fileless attacks and provides essential evidence.
Efficient incident response: Offers tools aiding quick response across environments.

Fidelis Elevate is implemented across industries for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Companies leverage its network visibility and remote connectivity in endpoint and network detection, effectively preventing threats within complex environments. Its holistic integration serves as an essential asset for security analysts focused on incident response.

Fidelis Security

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] is an advanced endpoint protection solution that harnesses machine learning for proactive threat detection to secure enterprise environments effectively.

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] integrates AI-driven security technologies to provide comprehensive defense mechanisms against evolving cyber threats. Focusing on real-time threat detection, it utilizes behavioral analytics to anticipate and neutralize threats before they materialize. Its ease of integration into existing systems and its proactive approach to security make it a strong choice for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

What are the main features?

AI-Driven Detection: Uses advanced machine learning algorithms to identify and stop threats in real-time.
Behavioral Analytics: Monitors endpoint behavior to quickly spot anomalies and mitigate risks.
Scalability: Easily scalable to accommodate growing organizational demands without compromising performance.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Leverages cloud capabilities for seamless updates and reduced overhead.

What benefits should users consider?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens overall cybersecurity defenses against sophisticated attacks.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs with automated threat detection and response.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes potential business disruptions through swift threat neutralization.
Enhanced Integration: Compatible with diverse IT environments for smooth implementation.

Enterprises in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications have successfully adopted SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] to shield critical operations. Its integration into existing IT infrastructure provides enhanced security while maintaining operational efficiency across the board.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

First Midwest Bank

NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, Cynet, Fortinet and others in Threat Deception Platforms. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Threat Deception Platforms vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Deception Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.