Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FioranoMQ vs Red Hat Fuse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FioranoMQ
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (19th)
Red Hat Fuse
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. FioranoMQ is designed for Message Queue (MQ) Software and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Red Hat Fuse, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 6.7% mindshare, down 7.0% since last year.
Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
FioranoMQ0.4%
IBM MQ22.5%
ActiveMQ22.4%
Other54.7%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Fuse6.7%
IBM Integration Bus16.6%
Mule ESB15.0%
Other61.7%
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Use FioranoMQ?
Leave a review
Nilay Rathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Chapter Area Lead/GM Group Architecture & IT at Spark New Zealand
Microservices have transformed our integrations and now highlight room to improve AI-driven tooling
There are areas in Red Hat Fuse that have room for improvement. We were recently having a discussion with Red Hat team building agentic AI, which we call AI SDLC. Something that the team is actively working on, but I have not really seen any production-level version of it is MCP. For us to use Red Hat Fuse with AI models, we need MCP so that we can be very confident that it can deliver us a really solid outcome when developers are using it, whether it is any of the integration patterns or messaging bus patterns. I have not seen that yet. Even though Red Hat has an alternative to that, such as a plugin, it is not as advanced as some of the MCPs that we see around.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Fuse?
I think the pricing for Red Hat Fuse is okay; it's not expensive, and the support is good.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?
The downsides of Red Hat Fuse that I encountered were related to the Java virtual machine I worked with, which was Oracle, as the client did not create good services. In the integration, they had m...
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Fuse?
My use cases for Red Hat Fuse include using Drools to create a bunch of rules for the Finance Ministry in Chile many years ago. I worked with another enterprise named Aguas Andinas, which is a very...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IG Index, UC Berkeley, Schlumberger Oil Fields, Credit Agricole Titres, FairEx International Financial Systems Ptv Ltd, FinScope, Large Hedge Fund, LiquidityHub, Scottrade, Thomas Weisel Partners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commission Junction, Connect First, Flytxt, Xylo, Wireless Matrix Corp, Korea Telecom, Qwest Communications
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.