Top 10 Red Hat Fuse Alternatives

Name: Red Hat Fuse
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.1 (26 reviews)

Vendor: Red Hat

4.1 out of 5

26 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Red Hat Fuse Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat Fuse based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include webMethods.io, IBM DataPower Gateway, and Mule ESB. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Red Hat Fuse surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration capabilities, built-in cloud-native architecture, and enhanced security features, enabling efficient application connectivity and deployment across hybrid cloud environments while ensuring optimal performance and scalability for businesses.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

webMethods.io

4.0 out of 5

webMethods.io

4.0 out of 5

Red Hat Fuse offers cost-effective integration with adaptable connectivity and containerization. In comparison, webMethods.io emphasizes strong connectors, making it ideal for enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce. Red Hat's open-source nature appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while webMethods.io suits larger enterprises seeking comprehensive features.

Download Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io Report

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse typically has lower upfront setup costs, while webMethods.io may require higher initial investments, highlighting a key differentiation for budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse typically has lower upfront setup costs, while webMethods.io may require higher initial investments, highlighting a key differentiation for budget considerations.

IBM DataPower Gateway

4.2 out of 5

IBM DataPower Gateway

4.2 out of 5

IBM DataPower Gateway is cost-effective, excels in security, and offers strong support. In comparison, Red Hat Fuse provides versatility with lightweight, scalable integrations and flexible architecture, appealing to organizations focused on functionality and microservices. Tech buyers prioritize features select Red Hat Fuse for its adaptability.

Download IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Red Hat Fuse Report

Pricing

IBM DataPower Gateway has higher initial setup costs compared to Red Hat Fuse, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM DataPower Gateway has higher initial setup costs compared to Red Hat Fuse, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.

Mule ESB

4.1 out of 5

Mule ESB

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Fuse excels with Apache Camel integration and adaptability for DevOps environments. In comparison, Mule ESB provides extensive connectors and data transformation capabilities. Red Hat Fuse is cost-effective for open-source enthusiasts, while Mule ESB suits enterprises seeking comprehensive features despite higher costs.

Download Mule ESB vs. Red Hat Fuse Report

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Mule ESB is noted for its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Mule ESB is noted for its higher initial investment.

IBM Integration Bus

4.0 out of 5

IBM Integration Bus

4.0 out of 5

IBM Integration Bus excels in protocol support and scalability, suitable for enterprises needing SOA compliance. In comparison, Red Hat Fuse offers developer-friendly flexibility with containerization for microservices. IBM suits complex integrations; Red Hat benefits budget-conscious teams with diverse open-source options.

Download IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse Report

Pricing

IBM Integration Bus has a higher setup cost but offers robust features, while Red Hat Fuse provides a more cost-effective option with flexible integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Integration Bus has a higher setup cost but offers robust features, while Red Hat Fuse provides a more cost-effective option with flexible integration capabilities.

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

3.8 out of 5

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

3.8 out of 5

Red Hat Fuse excels with Apache Camel integration, adaptable containerization, and ease of use for deployments. In comparison, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator focuses on robust API management and standardization, appealing to those who prioritize transformation features and comprehensive integration support.

Download Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse has higher initial setup costs compared to WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, which offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses for integration solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Fuse has higher initial setup costs compared to WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, which offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses for integration solutions.

Oracle Service Bus

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Service Bus

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Service Bus offers robust integration capabilities and service orchestration suited for complex environments. In comparison, Red Hat Fuse is flexible with Apache Camel support, appealing for containerization. Tech buyers might choose Oracle for comprehensive features and Red Hat for cost-effective and open-source flexibility.

Download Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse Report

Pricing

Oracle Service Bus features lower setup costs compared to Red Hat Fuse, which tends to incur higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Service Bus features lower setup costs compared to Red Hat Fuse, which tends to incur higher initial expenses.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

3.9 out of 5

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

3.9 out of 5

IBM WebSphere Message Broker delivers robust processing and scalability for high-volume events. In comparison, Red Hat Fuse, with its lightweight and flexible design, suits microservices architectures, offering efficiency through cost-effectiveness, rapid deployment, and open-source adaptability, benefiting tech buyers seeking flexible, cloud-native solutions.

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Red Hat Fuse Report

Pricing

IBM WebSphere Message Broker presents higher setup costs compared to Red Hat Fuse, highlighting a distinction in initial investment. Conversely, Red Hat Fuse offers a cost-effective setup, underscoring its affordability advantage.

View comparison

Pricing

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

4.0 out of 5

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

4.0 out of 5

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus excels in ease of deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Red Hat Fuse, with its open-source structure, offers flexibility and robust features. Tech buyers might choose TIBCO for support or Red Hat Fuse for customization.

Download Red Hat Fuse vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Report

Pricing

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus has a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Fuse. Red Hat Fuse offers a more cost-effective initial setup, distinguishing itself from the more expensive TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Business-to-Business Middleware

Managed File Transfer (MFT)