Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Red Hat Fuse pros and cons

Vendor: Red Hat

4.1 out of 5

26 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Red Hat Fuse is easy to set up and maintain, offering stability and performance for seamless system integration and high scalability. Though praised for adaptability and containerization benefits, it requires expertise due to complexity and has a steep learning curve. Documentation needs improvement, and the pricing is regarded as high. Flexibility and microservices compatibility should be enhanced, making it ideal for those seeking extensive Apache technology compatibility but potentially costly and challenging for diverse requirements.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat Fuse is easy to set up and maintain, with a straightforward initial setup process.

The platform is praised for its stability and performance, with users experiencing months or even years without issues.

Red Hat Fuse is highly adaptable to diverse use cases, facilitating seamless system integration and offering extensive compatibility with Apache technologies.

The software development environment and containerization are highly valued, enabling efficient load balancing and supporting large data processing.

Users appreciate Red Hat Fuse for its scalability, rating it nearly perfect for both enterprise and general application integrations.

CONS

Red Hat Fuse has a steep learning curve, requiring external expertise for implementation due to its complexity.

Documentation for Red Hat Fuse can be enhanced with more up-to-date content, comprehensive examples, and community input for clarity.

The pricing model of Red Hat Fuse is a major concern, as many find it expensive and believe the price should be lower.

Flexibility is a significant concern, with Red Hat Fuse needing to better adapt to various requirements and work seamlessly with other applications.

Containerization and deployment processes in Red Hat Fuse require improvements, as they are considered overly heavy and not fully oriented toward modern microservices environments.

Red Hat Fuse Pros review quotes

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 22, 2018

I found it was quite easy to set up and implement.

Read full review

reviewer1112313

AppValue at a tech services company

Aug 12, 2019

The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.

Read full review

reviewer1056840

Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 3, 2020

The most valuable feature is the software development environment.

Read full review

Free Report: Red Hat Fuse Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Red Hat Fuse. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JA

Business Solution Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 25, 2020

We usually had used PowerCenter for master data integration (by replication). But in some cases, it was better to use Fuse for providing the master data online. It doesn't make it necessary to replicate data.

Read full review

VP at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Dec 24, 2020

The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting.

Read full review

WJ

Systems Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 8, 2021

The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing.

Read full review

reviewer1712775

Manager of Integration Services at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees

Nov 9, 2021

This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly.

Read full review

reviewer1728324

Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Dec 13, 2021

More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect.

Read full review

Developer at Torei Consulting

Jan 19, 2022

Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly.

Read full review

Co-Founder at BeatO

May 15, 2022

The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 26)

Red Hat Fuse Cons review quotes

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 22, 2018

The web tools need to be updated.

Read full review

reviewer1112313

AppValue at a tech services company

Aug 12, 2019

The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.

Read full review

reviewer1056840

Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 3, 2020

Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly.

Read full review

Free Report: Red Hat Fuse Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Red Hat Fuse. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JA

Business Solution Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 25, 2020

I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process.

Read full review

VP at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Dec 24, 2020

Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible.

Read full review

WJ

Systems Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 8, 2021

It might help if, in the documentation, there were a comments section or some kind of community input. I might read a page of documentation and not fully understand everything, or it might not quite answer the question I had. If there were a section associated with it where people could discuss the same topic, that might be helpful because somebody else might have already asked the question that I had.

Read full review

reviewer1712775

Manager of Integration Services at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees

Nov 9, 2021

Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions.

Read full review

reviewer1728324

Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Dec 13, 2021

The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved.

Read full review

Developer at Torei Consulting

Jan 19, 2022

As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced.

Read full review

Co-Founder at BeatO

May 15, 2022

What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 26)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

webMethods.io vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Red Hat Fuse

Mule ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM Integration Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Red Hat Fuse

Oracle Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs Red Hat Fuse

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

JBoss ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

webMethods.io vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Red Hat Fuse

Mule ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM Integration Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Red Hat Fuse

Oracle Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs Red Hat Fuse

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

JBoss ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

See all alternatives

Related questions

16

What are pros and cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server?

5

What should I know about Red Hat JBoss Fuse?

34

What are the main cons/pros to choosing Biztalk Server as an ESB platform?

164

What is the difference between an API Gateway and ESB?

47

Informatica vs. MuleSoft vs. SnapLogic vs. CastIron - can you help?

81

Sonic ESB was a leader in ESB market in the past. Now Aurea Sonic ESB is shown as 13th position. Can it pick-up market in future?

24

What questions should I ask before buying an ESB?

134

In a Digital Banking Environment how do we see the role of ESB/ API Managers?

14

When evaluating ESB, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

14

Can we design both SOAP and REST services using an ESB?