Fivetran vs NetApp Snapshot comparison

Fivetran and NetApp are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. Fivetran holds a 4.9% mindshare in DR, compared to NetApp’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,548 Views
364 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Snapshot

Read 26 NetApp Snapshot reviews

1,517 Views
1,411 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

NetApp Snapshot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

NetApp Snapshot and Fivetran compete in the data management space. Fivetran has an upper hand due to its superior automation features, while NetApp Snapshot is preferred for cost efficiency and robust support.

Features: NetApp Snapshot offers point-in-time copies for data backup and integrates with existing infrastructure, enhancing recovery processes. It also supports mirroring snapshots for effective disaster recovery. Fivetran provides automated data integration with robust ETL processes, seamless connector integration, and data transformation capabilities that streamline data movement.

Room for Improvement: NetApp Snapshot could enhance search functionalities within its snapshot management and improve data recovery precision. Better clarity in snapshot data location would further enhance user efficiency. Fivetran might benefit from expanding its data source compatibility, optimizing cost structures for smaller enterprises, and enhancing real-time data syncing across diverse platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Snapshot integrates into existing IT setups with minimal disruption and is backed by responsive customer support. Fivetran offers a quick cloud-based deployment, facilitating swift setup and adaptation. Its customer service is recognized for prompt issue resolution, making it straightforward to initiate.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Snapshot offers moderate setup costs with a promising quick ROI because of efficient data management practices. Fivetran's pricing is higher but justified by its extensive features and potential for significant value over time, although it requires a longer ROI horizon. The choice hinges on prioritizing immediate budget-saving or long-term integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (13th), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

NetApp Snapshot

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Snapshot is 5.6%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NetApp Snapshot	5.6%
Fivetran	4.9%
Other	89.5%

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Tanveer Rahman

Chief Technical Office at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Snapshots have enabled us to restore critical data quickly and confidently after unexpected changes

The functions or features I have found most valuable in NetApp Snapshot are that it is easy to do and takes very little time. The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something. It gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else. I use NetApp's WAFL architecture as it is their way of doing things, how to save the files and everything else. It is built-in. You cannot avoid WAFL when you use NetApp. Regarding the integration of NetApp Snapshot with applications and workloads, we have NetApp Snapshot integrated with our OpenStack platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality, and when the time investment decreases, fewer developers are needed, which means significant savings."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

More Fivetran pros

"The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."

"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It centralizes your data."

"This mature product is the leader in the backup industry with unique features and capabilities for users with advanced backup needs."

"You never have to worry about protecting your virtual machines."

"You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines."

"NetApp Snapshot's most valuable features are the snapshot capabilities, you can take snaps of shared directories, files, and VMs."

"The most valuable feature of NetApp Snapshot is its ease of management."

More NetApp Snapshot pros

Cons

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"The experience of using SDK connectors can be improved, as it lacks computational power, which is an area that needs enhancement."

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

More Fivetran cons

"The price could be a bit lower."

"The licensing cost could be improved."

"I think the automation needs some improvement."

"NetApp needs to take a look at their pricing in comparison to the competition and make the appropriate change to attract more customers and gain in market share."

"Not a perfect ten because there is one point off to give it room for improvement."

"In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."

"The UI is probably their biggest weakness. There are always glitches in the HTML UI."

"In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."

More NetApp Snapshot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The solution is affordable."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"Snapshot is free and comes with the NetApp storage software. It's purely free of cost."

"If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release."

"The price of NetApp Snapshot depends on the use case. They charge by how much data you need, the capability, and for snap licenses."

"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."

"The price of the solution is reasonable but could improve. However, if you are in a country that has a poor currency then the price will be considered expensive."

"NetApp Snapshot is expensive since you need to buy an additional premium license for it which is an extra cost over the payments made for NetApp...The license works during the entire life cycle of NetApp Snapshot."

"It's not too expensive."

"The price of this solution is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What method of data replication does NetApp Snapshot use?

Here's a breakdown of how the data replication by NetApp Snapshot works: it's through the snapshot replication method. What does that mean? Well, in simple words, the software creates copies of dat...

See all answers

What is the storage scale of NetApp Snapshot?

Last time I checked, the NetApp Snapshot data replication software could go up to 255 snapshot copies. I'm not sure how familiar you are with similar software, but that's a pretty good number. It g...

See all answers

Will NetApp Snapshot recover data in an emergency?

Well yes, the snapshots that NetApp Snapshot creates are your backup. But then there's also their feature for advanced backup. This allows you to copy backups to offline locations and also make arc...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

NetApp SnapMirror vs NetApp Snapshot

Compared 30% of the time

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs NetApp Snapshot

Compared 17% of the time

DDN DataFlow vs NetApp Snapshot

Compared 12% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp Snapshot

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Availability vs NetApp Snapshot

Compared 8% of the time

More NetApp Snapshot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

February 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Snapshot

January 2026

Download NetApp Snapshot product report

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

NetApp Snapshot is a data replication software that works through snapshot copies, crucial for the recovery of data. These copies are used as safe points for rollback before upgrades or patches. NetApp Snapshot provides prompt data replication which is also highly space-efficient, and provides users with the full management and control of their data and its copies. Through the various solutions the Snapshot technology has introduced, companies receive enhanced stability, functionality, and performance, as well as storage efficiency.

NetApp Snapshot uses two types of snapshot technologies to handle data replication: Copy on Write (COW) and Redirect on Write (ROW). The COW technologies make a copy of the original information and then only after the replication process is completed does the system overwrite the modified data into the original blocks. In contrast, ROW redirects the snapshots to new storage blocks, updating pointers to those blocks, which always point to the original location. When NetApp Snapshot combines the two technologies, it allows customers to save storage efficiency by way of deduplication and compression.

NetApp Snapshot Features

NetApp Snapshot’s valuable features include:

Data replication stability: Every NetApp Snapshot copy is an immutable, static copy, giving organizations the opportunity to create consistent backups from their storage system while applications are running.
Performance impact: The performance of NetApp's systems that store NetApp Snapshot aren’t affected. The actions of creating or deleting a Snapshot copy also don't greatly impact the performance of the systems where they are located. NetApp’s storage can be used for data replication, backup, and archival even if a company is using another storage system.
Storage scale: Another beneficial feature of NetApp is the volume of storage, which supports 255 Snapshot copies. This provides users with the opportunity to perform frequent data replication, thus creating current versions of their data.
File recovery: The above-mentioned features allow for the creation of backup for recovery purposes. They also provide\ the opportunity to copy backups to offline storage as well as to create an archive for them.
Storage utilization: The option for utilization of storage allows NetApp Snapshot users to benefit from storage volumes similar to those of active file systems. The software works through block increment, which limits the interval of time between added blocks of Snapshot copies, thus creating more efficient storage.

NetApp Snapshot Benefits

The benefits of using NetApp Snapshot include:

Ability to create instant data replication while applications run
Up to 255 data replicas available
Various tools for full-package coverage, including SnapManager, SnapProtect, SnapMirror, SnapRestore, and SnapVault

Reviews from Real Users

Gregg N., Manager of Data Center Services at TTi Power Equipment, states that the primary use of NetApp Snapshot by his organization is as a data-protection solution in the cloud and in the data center. He points out that this data duplication software is very user-friendly, extremely stable, and scalable.

Edgar M., Sr. Data Protection Engineer at DataPivot Technologies, uses NetApp Snapshot for its monitoring or clone capabilities, and he agrees that the solution is very stable.

According to George A., CEO at BDPR Technologies Limited, the most valuable features of NetApp Snapshot are the integration with other vendors and customization.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Mazda

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot

February 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. NetApp Snapshot report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.