Fivetran vs Stitch comparison

Fivetran and Qlik are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.3. Fivetran holds a 4.4% mindshare in CDI, compared to Qlik’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,548 Views
1,592 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Stitch

Read 7 Stitch reviews

764 Views
397 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Stitch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 18, 2025

Stitch and Fivetran are competing platforms in the data integration category, each offering distinct strengths. Stitch seems more appealing in terms of pricing and customer service, while Fivetran has the upper hand due to its robust feature set that justifies its cost.

Features: Stitch offers flexibility through extensive customization options and a broad range of integrations, allowing organizations to tailor their data solutions. Its system adaptability is highly prized by teams needing varied integrations. Fivetran provides automatic schema updates, prebuilt connectors, and a focus on streamlined automated maintenance, enhancing data pipeline efficiency and reducing the need for manual intervention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stitch is noted for its simplified deployment model, complemented by responsive and hands-on customer support, which is particularly beneficial for organizations requiring more direct assistance. Fivetran employs a highly automated deployment strategy, requiring less manual setup but potentially involving a more complex initial configuration phase. As a result, Fivetran's customer service may be less directly engaged due to its automation-centric approach.

Pricing and ROI: Stitch provides competitive pricing with lower setup costs, appealing to smaller teams and startups aiming for quick ROI. Fivetran is more expensive; however, it is favored for its comprehensive feature set that provides long-term value, validating the higher initial investment. Its emphasis on automated processes facilitates ongoing cost efficiencies and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Stitch Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Stitch

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (13th), Data Replication (3rd)

Stitch

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stitch is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fivetran	4.4%
Stitch	1.2%
Other	94.4%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

reviewer2783532

Cloud Data Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Improved data management has reduced errors while consistent loads have saved weekly effort

I think the best feature Stitch offers is that it handles deleted records. Stitch's ability to handle deleted records is a standout feature for me because if a record is deleted at the source, I can easily track it with soft delete and all that functionality. Stitch has impacted my organization positively, as I have both positive and negative aspects with it. One positive aspect is that full loads are free, so whenever I see data issues, I can go for full loads. At the same time, I need to look at the limitations, such as API limits. Stitch has helped my organization achieve better data management, making it easier. Better data management means that Stitch helps my team access data faster and reduces errors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"Fivetran is an easy-to-deploy solution for organizations looking at integrating a wide variety of data sources."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

More Fivetran pros

"The setup process for Stitch was pretty easy, with a plug and play approach where the data is immediately available."

"Easy setup and easy change management are the best features Stitch offers, along with a good admin panel."

"The best features Stitch offers are that I can copy the designs directly to Figma, which has helped my team and me tremendously because in the beginning we had to design the application from scratch, but now we can get inspirations from Stitch and copy directly from Stitch to shorten our time."

"The most valuable feature of Stitch for us is ease of use. This solution is fire-and-forget. All an organization has to do is set up the connection or integration and move on."

"Stitch has helped my organization achieve better data management, making it easier, as it helps my team access data faster and reduces errors."

"Stitch has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to create MVPs quickly."

"Stitch helps immensely because in just a day, we are able to cover the work that would normally take two to three weeks worth of design work nonstop."

Cons

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"If Fivetran can build in more transformations, that would be really helpful in my opinion."

"In our case, we ultimately did not end up using Fivetran because we were able to do custom connects at a lower cost compared to Fivetran. From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option."

More Fivetran cons

"Generally speaking, support is a pain point. In the next release, I would love to see a change in support from the current chat to a more comprehensive portal."

"My experience with customer support for Stitch has been very bad."

"The conversion to Figma is not effective."

"The designs that Stitch produces sometimes cannot really be used for final launch, but I understand Stitch was designed just for rapid prototyping and for teams to get from the point where they just have an idea to having an actual product."

"Stitch should definitely provide more extractors than it does now and provide the ability for teams to integrate their own extractors."

"The customer support of Stitch is horrible."

"Stitch can be improved by being able to connect the design system to it, and being able to design any components from that design system would be the best improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"The solution is affordable."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Talend Stitch?

To improve Stitch, I think the explanation about the errors could be simplified because I currently use ChatGPT to understand what is wrong with the connection or with the run. Another thing that I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Talend Stitch?

I have been using Stitch for the past two years in two different companies. My main use case for Stitch is connecting to third-party apps, extracting the data out of them, and transferring it into ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Talend Stitch?

My advice for others looking into using Stitch is to use it as a last resort, but it is going to be probably the best affordable application. I would rate this review a six out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

CData Sync vs Fivetran

Compared 2% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

AWS Glue vs Stitch

Compared 33% of the time

SAS Data Integration Server vs Stitch

Compared 22% of the time

More Stitch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

February 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Stitch

January 2026

Download Stitch product report

Also Known As

No data available

Talend Stitch ETL

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Stitch is a cloud-based ETL service designed to synchronize data between a variety of sources and destinations, offering robust and scalable data integration capabilities.

Stitch facilitates seamless data integration, providing users with real-time data movement across their tech stack. Its flexible architecture allows easy connectivity between diverse systems and ensures data consistency. With its user-friendly setup, Stitch empowers data teams to efficiently manage complex data workflows, enhancing decision-making and operational efficiency.

What are Stitch's most important features?

Data Extraction: Efficiently extracts data from numerous sources, ensuring smooth data flow across platforms.
Real-Time Data Sync: Offers synchronized data transfer to maintain up-to-date datasets.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs with scalable architecture.
Secure Data Transfer: Implements security practices ensuring data integrity during transfers.
API Access: Provides API connectivity for robust data pipeline customization.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Stitch?

Improved Decision-Making: Enables timely and informed business decisions with real-time data accessibility.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with manual data integration processes.
Increased Productivity: Frees up IT resources by automating data movement, allowing teams to focus on strategic tasks.
Enhanced Data Accuracy: Minimizes errors through automated and consistent data integration processes.

In industries like e-commerce and finance, Stitch is instrumental in integrating data from sales platforms and financial systems to analytics tools. Retailers can combine online and offline sales data, while financial firms streamline data into centralized repositories, ensuring comprehensive analysis and reporting.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

AB InBev, Accolade, Accor, AstraZeneca, Beachbody

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Stitch

February 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Stitch

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Stitch and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Stitch report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.