StreamSets and Fivetran compete in the data integration and pipeline management category. StreamSets holds an advantage in configuration flexibility and broad connector options, while Fivetran edges forward with user-friendly interfaces and managed data pipelines.
Features: StreamSets offers ease of configuration with a wide range of connectors allowing for robust data transformation and drift resilience. Its graphical data pipeline design tool supports both batch and streaming integration. Additionally, StreamSets minimally requires coding, which benefits less technically proficient teams. Fivetran excels in managed, seamless data replication and simple automation. Its integration with DBT for transformations and an easy setup process with an intuitive interface caters well to large data operations.
Room for Improvement: StreamSets faces challenges with non-Java platform integration, memory leak issues, and complicated logging mechanisms. Security gaps and limited SAP HANA features also need attention. Fivetran's high pricing, limited pipeline observability, and desire for more connectors are concerns. The tool's documentation and logs require enhancement, alongside customization options for hybrid environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StreamSets supports deployment across public, hybrid, and on-premises environments, though user feedback suggests customer service response times are slow. Fivetran prioritizes public cloud and hybrid environments and is praised for simplicity and user experience, yet it lacks rapid support responses. Both platforms can improve user support, but Fivetran's easy deployment often reduces frustration.
Pricing and ROI: StreamSets utilizes a flexible CPU core-based licensing model with community and enterprise versions, noted for high costs but providing significant ROI through efficiency savings. In contrast, Fivetran's pricing may escalate with usage due to its data volume pricing model but is viewed as a worthwhile investment for larger operations due to its simplicity and scalability.
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
IBM technical support sometimes transfers tickets between different teams due to shift changes, which can be frustrating.
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users.
It would be beneficial if StreamSets addressed any potential memory leak issues to prevent unnecessary upgrades.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with a large variety of data sources is valuable.
It allows a hybrid installation approach, rather than being completely cloud-based or on-premises.
Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com
StreamSets is a data integration platform that enables organizations to efficiently move and process data across various systems. It offers a user-friendly interface for designing, deploying, and managing data pipelines, allowing users to easily connect to various data sources and destinations. StreamSets also provides real-time monitoring and alerting capabilities, ensuring that data is flowing smoothly and any issues are quickly addressed.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
