

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Netgate pfSense compete in the network security category. Netgate pfSense has an upper hand due to its broader feature set and high return on investment.
Features: Forcepoint offers advanced threat protection, high network speed, and strong support services. Netgate pfSense provides traffic shaping, comprehensive VPN capabilities, and an extensive range of additional features.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint could improve policy management, integration with other security tools, and user interface. Netgate pfSense users suggest enhancing hardware compatibility, streamlining updates, and improving the initial setup process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint users find the deployment process straightforward but mention slow customer service. Netgate pfSense has a steeper learning curve but offers responsive customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint has reasonable setup costs and good ROI, especially for large organizations. Netgate pfSense has low initial costs and high ROI due to its extensive feature set.
Cybersecurity ROI could be $1 or $100 million, depending on the risk of data behind it.
It is easy and offers different solutions for each solution type with small, mid, and large scale options available.
I did see a return on investment with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, as mentioned by the efficiency improvements and the metrics related to how much I cut investigation time, the number of incidents, and the ease of making changes or pushing new configurations.
It's very favorable to have the inclusion of firewall, VPN, and router functionalities.
Compared to what we were doing with Sophos, it provides a great value financially and in terms of time savings.
I have seen a return on investment with cost savings after implementing Netgate pfSense, as other firewalls would cost me lakhs of rupees while pfSense is free.
Unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging.
TAC engineers are very experienced and troubleshoot issues within the expected timeframe with no problems.
We have a point of contact from the account manager to the presales representative, and they connect with the technical support team, providing support in Indian time, so we do not have to worry about US or European time zones.
When we're down, that's $8000 an hour on a $1500 firewall.
The support is prompt and effective, making it well worth the investment.
Even when they're in the middle of deploying a new version, I've reached out and received a download link within five minutes.
I can have one management node similar to Palo Alto Panorama, with multiple nodes covering different sites, data centers, or zones.
Even if you have some firewalls in the cluster, it is not necessary to have them on the same version.
In a country such as India with a large population, we often need to scale up or down depending on projects and requirements, and it is very much easy to do both ways.
The next step up now is to the 4100, which gives you an additional preconfigured WAN port that allows you to easily separate networks.
Netgate doesn't come anywhere close to the scalability that its competitors do.
Due to the absence of a single pane of glass management feature, scaling out pfSense becomes quite challenging.
It has many freezes for no reason.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall should make some improvements because there is some instability with their software.
Netgate pfSense rates a 10 for stability, and I have experienced no issues there.
Otherwise, I've never seen one have a problem. It's just rock solid.
It has been running for four years now without any issues.
Fast response and efficient handling of issues, similar to how Fortinet responds, would be great.
AI improvements could be beneficial, as having AI capabilities has become an important checkmark feature.
I recommend that additional features be included in a single license to avoid the need for extra licensing costs.
I need to speak to someone immediately.
You could add AI for troubleshooting with Netgate pfSense because it will be easier for new engineers.
I would like to have the ability to control all my devices from one place.
The costs can be high since additional features require separate licenses.
In terms of price, I would say Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not expensive.
In terms of pricing, I would place Forcepoint in the middle when compared to other firewalls like Fortinet and Palo Alto.
The cost of the 3500 was closer to $4,000.
I don't always seek the cheapest or most expensive option but rather the best value for my investment.
The total cost of ownership is very low.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has impacted my organization positively by making it very easy to work and offering a more competitive price compared to other vendors.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has positively impacted my organization by providing always-on perimeter security.
Strong network segmentation is my favorite feature that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers.
pfSense's flexibility is great. If you don't have the money to buy the NetGate hardware, anything works with it. You can toss it on any low-end piece of hardware or virtualize it if you choose to virtualize it.
We have multiple VLANs, and with assistance, it was easy to get everything set up and running in our organization the way we needed it to.
We had downtime before pfSense. We've never gone down using the solution.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Netgate pfSense | 7.4% |
| Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall | 1.0% |
| Other | 91.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 171 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust network protection with features like URL filtering and advanced threat protection, ensuring comprehensive security and operational efficiency across various infrastructures.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall integrates URL filtering and advanced threat protection, including intrusion prevention and DDoS prevention. The centralized management console provides application awareness, strong network segmentation, and SD-WAN capabilities. Its graphical interface enhances user experience, while efficient technical support and seamless integration offer stability and scalability. Companies use it for perimeter security, VPNs, and threat prevention, optimizing performance in diverse sectors.
What are the key features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely implemented in sectors including finance, education, and government, offering security for data centers and managing remote access with IPsec VPN tunnels, SSL VPNs, and site-to-site connectivity. Companies appreciate its use for Unified Threat Management and automatic optimization, ensuring data security and efficient network performance.
Netgate pfSense is an open-source firewall and router software known for scalability, cost-effectiveness, and community support. It includes customizable packages for varied network management needs, offering solid performance and straightforward management for diverse setups.
Netgate pfSense provides an impressive range of functionalities including firewall capabilities, VPN options, and extensive customization through packages. Its low resource usage and high availability make it viable for businesses of all sizes, especially when dealing with tailored network demands. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in ease of use, mobile compatibility, and support for plug-ins. Enhanced centralized management, better documentation, and additional security features are frequent requests.
What are the key features of Netgate pfSense?In education and healthcare, Netgate pfSense is employed for secure connectivity and efficient traffic management, accommodating distinct demands of remote access and content filtering. Organizations in these sectors often utilize features such as load balancing and VPNs to maintain secure and reliable network operations while integrating with services like Active Directory for streamlined identity management. Small to medium-sized enterprises benefit from its affordability and robust functionality, making it a go-to choice for managed service environments requiring effective network security and control.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.