


FortiCNAPP and Microsoft Defender for Cloud compete in the network security and cloud protection sector. While both solutions offer excellent visibility and automation, FortiCNAPP may have an edge with its extensive SIEM integrations and enhanced policy recommendations.
Features: FortiCNAPP stands out with its robust network segmentation, integration with various SIEM solutions, and advanced anomaly detection. It offers proactive tools for identifying vulnerabilities and excels in compliance reporting. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive threat protection and regulatory compliance support. It provides advanced threat detection, seamless multi-cloud environment integration, and centralized visibility.
Room for Improvement: FortiCNAPP could enhance user-friendliness, improve IAM security control, and better address compliance metrics. Users suggest improved data governance and smoother integration with tools like Slack and Datadog. Microsoft Defender for Cloud could become more intuitive, provide better support for legacy systems, and handle rapid UI changes and pricing transparency more effectively. Both solutions have areas for improvement in user interface and efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiCNAPP offers strong integration with DevOps tools and supportive technical assistance, particularly during integration phases. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness, especially via Slack. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides broad cloud support, though its setup is complex. It integrates well across Microsoft’s suite, yet users experience challenges understanding updates and dealing with specific technical support issues.
Pricing and ROI: FortiCNAPP presents competitive pricing with substantial ROI, emphasizing network security value with engagement level-based flexible pricing. Microsoft Defender for Cloud's pricing can be complex and potentially high, especially for small businesses. However, it is competitive when bundled with Microsoft products. While FortiCNAPP shows clear ROI in resource management, Microsoft Defender for Cloud supports various scale needs with a less immediate ROI realization.
The detailed information PingSafe gives about how to fix vulnerabilities reduces the time spent on remediation by about 70 to 80 percent.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
FortiCNAPP is a competitive and robust solution, the only one in the IT sphere that addresses all quadrants in the Gartner Quadrants.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
Compared to not having Microsoft Defender for Cloud in place, we definitely saw an advantage by not having downtime due to a security threat.
When we send an email, they respond quickly and proactively provide solutions.
They took direct responsibility for the system and could solve queries quickly.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
My technical teams do utilize integration with DevOps tools, as it performs significantly with automation regarding sophisticated challenges.
Fortinet's technical support is definitely helpful and responsive.
Technical support from Fortinet is good; I get feedback and responses quickly.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
I would rate it a 10 out of 10 for scalability.
Scalability is no longer a concern because Cloud Native Security is a fully cloud-based resource.
I would rate the scalability of PingSafe 10 out of 10.
For complex large customers, global deployments, or large public sector customers, the process can take longer.
As we have reduced our on-premises infrastructure, it is about how we can migrate workloads to the cloud to make it easier, and then having everything fully encompassed and secured within that area makes it much easier for us to scale as needed and grow.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
The only downtime we had was when switching from V1 to V2 but it was smooth.
Cloud Native Security is a SaaS product and I've never experienced an outage.
They respond within the service level agreements and are proactive in their approach.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
I have not experienced any crashes or downtime.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
If they can merge Kubernetes Security with other modules related to Kubernetes, that would help us to get more modules in the current subscription.
As organizations move to the cloud, a cloud posture management tool that offers complete cloud visibility becomes crucial for maintaining compliance.
I would also like to see Cloud Native Security offer APIs that allow us to directly build dashboards within the platform.
The vulnerability part is not systematically organized; it is all clumsy in the web UI, and it is not user-friendly.
The solution could be more user-friendly and intuitive.
Policy implementation is quite complex, and the stability will take more time for the solutions.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
There are some tools that are double the cost of Cloud Native Security.
I recall Cloud Native Security charging a slightly higher premium previously.
The pricing is a mediator compared to other products; it is not that much higher and not much lower than other products, making it a very affordable price.
Security has essentially no cost when compared to the cost of a breach.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
This tool has been helpful for us. It allows us to search for vulnerabilities and provides evidence directly on the screen.
Cloud Native Security's cloud SIEM feature has been essential in preventing our most critical security incidents.
The cloud misconfiguration feature gave us almost zero false positives.
It functions as a proactive tool, enabling me to identify threats quickly and automate responses.
The machine learning capability in Lacework FortiCNAPP is used for threat detection.
FortiCNAPP definitely brings time-saving benefits.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 16.5% |
| SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | 4.4% |
| FortiCNAPP | 3.5% |
| Other | 75.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 55 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.
Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.
What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?
What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.
FortiCNAPP is a comprehensive cloud security platform focusing on ease of use and machine learning-driven anomaly detection. It offers robust compliance reporting, seamless integration, and continuous monitoring, making it an essential tool for organizations managing multi-cloud environments and security configurations.
FortiCNAPP provides significant capabilities in cloud security, compliance, and vulnerability management. Designed for organizations needing efficient monitoring, it enables detection of anomalies across cloud infrastructures while optimizing security posture and ensuring compliance with environments like AWS and GCP. The platform offers in-depth insights through scanning of IAC scripts, host systems, and cloud configurations. Recognized for effectively managing security posture, it safeguards Kubernetes and container environments, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. However, some areas like visibility, IAM security controls, and compliance metrics need improvement. Users face challenges with alert setup and lack intuitive design, alongside issues like FedRAMP authorization absence and complexity in the data model.
What are the key features of FortiCNAPP?FortiCNAPP is implemented extensively by industries needing reliable cloud security, such as finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. It supports organizations in enhancing cloud infrastructure protection, ensuring compliance, and strengthening vulnerability management. By integrating with platforms like AWS and GCP, businesses can optimize security posture in their cloud deployments.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.