Gatling Enterprise vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Gatling and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Gatling is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Gatling holds a 0.7% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gatling users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Gatling Enterprise

Read 3 Gatling Enterprise reviews

1,376 Views
206 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 82 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

10,774 Views
8,188 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Gatling Enterprise

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gatling Enterprise and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Load Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gatling Enterprise

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Gatling Enterprise is 0.7%. The mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 15.6%, up from 12.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	15.6%
Gatling Enterprise	0.7%
Other	83.7%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Deepesh Nigam

Lead Software Engineer at EPAM Systems

Performance testing has transformed microservice analysis and now enables faster issue resolution

In my opinion, some of the best features Gatling Enterprise offers include the web-based reporting dashboard, seamless integration, intuitive UI/UX, being built on Akka and Netty, being open source, and having AI/Intelligence. Regarding the AI or intelligence features, with the recent enhancements around automated test generation and smart reporting, creating complex simulation scenarios from HAR files or Open API definitions is faster than ever. This takes the guesswork out of script maintenance and also aids in anomaly detection in test runs. The seamless UI/UX, particularly the web-based reporting dashboard, is crisp, clean, and highly intuitive, making navigation easy for both technical engineers and management. I love the seamless integrations into modern DevOps pipelines via native plugins for Jenkins, GitLab, CI, GitHub Actions, and Maven/Gradle. Regarding Gatling Enterprise's AI capabilities, I think the security is very good. I specifically value the good security and governance capabilities provided by Gatling Enterprise, which include access controls, secure data handling, and the ability to manage sensitive information. However, I would like to see continued improvements in audit logging, transparency, and safeguards to ensure AI-generated outputs remain reliable and compliant. Gatling Enterprise integrates well with our AWS environment, supporting performance testing for cloud-based applications.

Read full review

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Experience a decade of seamless performance with robust support

I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see the same features that people generally prefer. I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit for me, and why I chose a five out of five, has been standardization across teams."

"Gatling Enterprise has positively impacted our organization by streamlining the workflow, easing the task, and reducing manual labor."

"We saw fewer outages and fewer periods of slowness in the product, and our number of customer complaints or customer escalations reduced by almost 20 to 30 percent over the period of a year when we initially started using Gatling Enterprise."

"Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website."

"This is a very mature tool that is always improving and has very good support as well."

"LoadRunner is easier to use and has support for better protocols."

"The support and the stability of those protocols are amazing."

"It is a good and stable tool."

"The load testing, reporting, and scripting features are all valuable features."

"Enables us to test most of the products and projects that we have across all the different technologies, without having to look at other tools."

"The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

Cons

"The UI can be made a little better to understand."

"The biggest limitation in Gatling Enterprise is distributed load testing."

"The setup is a little difficult."

"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients; it eats lots of memory, so usually, I have two or three load generators while I have the one controller."

"The fee for LoadRunner Professional is very high - about US$500 per user."

"Premium support is great, but before that when we just had general support, it was not all that great."

"I would like them to lower the licensing cost and provide better support."

"The flexibility could be improved. For example, there are some use cases where I prefer to use NeoLoad rather than LoadRunner because of the flexibility that it provides."

"Instead of having too many graphs and tabs, use the analysis section to get a more simplified defect analysis."

"Technical support needs to be faster, and the pricing should be more competitive."

"The license cost is much more compared to other tools available, but it will give you a complete package for load testing your application."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I don't know the licensing cost, but I think that you would get a discount for normal usage. I think there are different yearly options for different types of usage. It is not only how many users, but also whether it is shareable or not and other criteria involved in each feature. There are additional fees for the users and hardware linked to the processing."

"The fee for LoadRunner Professional is very high - about US$500 per user."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is a high price, I rate the solution a five."

"The pricing model, especially when involving partners, could use some improvement."

"This is not a cheap product."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement."

"It is a high-cost investment, particularly for companies with small budgets or limited testing needs."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

38%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	67

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gatling Enterprise?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that it is free only. Gatling Enterprise is open source, and licensing requires a third-party license, but it is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gatling Enterprise?

The setup is a little difficult. What I found is that you have to do a manual setup for Gatling Enterprise to be installed on your computer, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gatling Enterprise?

Gatling Enterprise is used by our organization to create performance test cases and functional test cases for our service. A specific example of one of the test cases we created using Gatling Enter...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I work only with the performance testing tools and not with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) for mobile and web applications. With performance testing, I am t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I can provide additional advice after consulting with my team. I am open to being contacted via email for any clarifications about my review. I rate OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (L...

See all answers

Comparisons

Opsfleet vs Gatling Enterprise

Compared 65% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Gatling Enterprise

Compared 35% of the time

More Gatling Enterprise Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 39% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Gatling Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

October 2026

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

Overview

Gatling Enterprise enhances performance testing with robust tools and advanced analytics that support efficiency in large-scale application development.

Designed for developers and testers, Gatling Enterprise provides comprehensive analysis and seamless integration. It enables teams to conduct actionable load tests effectively and optimize performance management. The platform is suitable for businesses aiming to ensure reliability and scalability in application deployment.

What are the critical features of Gatling Enterprise?

Scalable Load Testing: Supports high-volume testing scenarios for peak performance analysis.
Continuous Integration Compatibility: Easily integrates with CI tools to streamline testing workflows.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers insights and metrics during test execution for proactive adjustment.
Advanced Analytics: Provides detailed reports to facilitate informed decision-making.
Customizable Testing Scenarios: Allows tailored test frameworks meeting specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: Empowers applications to handle increased traffic efficiently.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure costs by optimizing resource utilization.
Increased Reliability: Minimizes downtime through robust performance stress testing.
Time Savings: Accelerates development cycles with automated testing processes.
Enhanced Scalability: Supports growth with proven test results and analytics.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Gatling Enterprise is implemented to ensure high availability and responsiveness under critical loads. Its ability to adapt to industry-specific demands makes it a go-to for companies requiring exceptional application performance during peak usage times.

Gatling

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Buyer's Guide

Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

September 2026

Free Report: Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Find out what your peers are saying about Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gatling Enterprise vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.