Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Google and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Google is ranked #25 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.5. Google holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

4,053 Views
2,716 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

1,515 Views
1,470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

OpenText Business Process M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in business process monitoring and operations. Google Cloud's operations suite seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and integration options, delivering more value despite higher costs.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is known for its detailed process tracking capabilities, seamless integration with other enterprise systems, and customized monitoring solutions. Google Cloud's operations suite offers strong real-time analytics, robust error reporting, and smooth integration with other Google services. Additionally, users value the extensive and customizable dashboards provided by Google Cloud.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring could enhance its cloud compatibility, improve reporting capabilities, and streamline user interfaces. Google Cloud's operations suite needs better documentation, improved support for complex configurations, and more responsive customer support channels. Both products have specific areas for enhancement based on user feedback.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring has a more complex deployment process but provides personalized customer service, which users value. Google Cloud's operations suite is easier to deploy thanks to its robust automation features, though some users find the customer support less personalized compared to OpenText.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring has higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI with its detailed monitoring capabilities. Google Cloud's operations suite, perceived as expensive, provides significant value and faster ROI due to its powerful feature set, making it worth the investment for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th)

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)	0.9%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or Big Query can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings. It has default integration for all gcp services. recently managed Prometheus support gives more flexibility to organizations to remain connected with their current Prometheus setup. We leveraged integrated FinOps Hub for recommendations for our workloads and server configurations, helpd us lot in order to get maximum TCO.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

"Google's technical support is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"I would tell potential users that the current version is much nicer than the previous one."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"The solution has improved our organization by reducing latency and also monitoring the costs of GCP usage by using the logging and monitoring features."

"It has really been helpful in detecting, identifying, and troubleshooting issues with cloud services used in the organization."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

"Ability to monitor multiple application protocols."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The solution is very good at showing users ways to use a user action on a website and to see the performance."

"Product allows business analysts to create the application with very little software development time needed."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"What I find most valuable is that it has synthetic monitoring that you can run from different geographies and identify, as it’s more proactive monitoring than reactive monitoring, so it'll alert customers before they find out things are not working, and proactive monitoring is very helpful to most of our customers."

Cons

"The logging functionality could be better."

"It could be more stable."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"It could be even more automated."

"Operations documentation could be a bit better. It took us some time to get up and running with it."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it."

"Google Stackdriver is a stable product, but there is some lagging we cannot stop."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect."

"Customer support is pretty average and can use some improvement."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"The product has been discontinued."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Support has experienced high turnover recently due to HP acqusition of the former Mercury Interactive product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"The cost could be lower."

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Stackdriver?

As Ops Suite, is a google product which effectively comes at zero setup cost, in order to manage your on-premises logs on onsite, it involves negligible cost for using ops agent and it also include...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 8% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Mezmo vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 8% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2026

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Also Known As

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

Overview

Google Cloud's operations suite is a comprehensive toolset offering multi-cloud support, insights into performance, uptime, health, and scalable logging for seamless cloud operations.

This suite by Google Cloud provides robust features for organizations managing workloads on GCP and AWS. It offers real-time logging and monitoring, aiding in efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis. With automatic monitoring, statistical insights for Kubernetes and VPNs, and the ability to manage logs, it helps in optimizing technology changes and supports risk management. Despite needs for better APM, cost clarity, migration tools, and enhanced documentation, companies benefit from its capabilities in tracking errors and analyzing metrics in execution environments.

What are the key features of Google Cloud's operations suite?

Multi-cloud Integration: Seamless support for GCP and AWS environments.
Performance Visibility: Insights into system health and uptime.
Scalable Logging: Efficient log management and export capabilities.
User-friendly Interface: Intuitive interaction for easy monitoring configuration.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Google Cloud's operations suite?

Enhanced Monitoring: Real-time updates facilitate swift response to performance issues.
Efficient Troubleshooting: Detailed log analysis helps resolve code issues quickly.
Performance Analysis: Dashboards support engineering load testing and SLA monitoring.

Industries utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite find it invaluable for optimizing cloud operations, especially in sectors involving extensive database requests and workload execution. Java and Python teams leverage its logging and alert capabilities for improved error tracking and metrics analysis, crucial for maintaining high-performance standards in tech-driven environments.

Google

OpenText Business Process Monitoring provides advanced capabilities in anomaly detection, proactive analysis, and alerts, enhancing monitoring proficiency with an easy-to-use interface supporting multiple application protocols.

Supporting organizations in identifying potential issues, OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers compelling functionality for monitoring applications through synthetic monitoring across geographies. Its strategic utility extends to asset management in large ERP systems, focusing on complex transactions, real user experience modeling, and change management. Easy implementation is bolstered by advantageous licensing deals and limited development time, helping business analysts create applications swiftly. Stability and scalability add significant value, although improvement is needed in support response times post-HP acquisition, protocol support challenges, and documentation clarity. Concerns revolve around real-time analytics, tool integration, and enhanced monitoring configurations.

What are key features?

Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregularities to prevent issues before they impact performance.
Proactive Analysis: Assesses potential risks for preemptive action.
Automatic Alerts: Provides instant notifications on critical developments.
Synthetic Monitoring: Enables proactive alerts and performance assessment from multiple geographies.
Multiple Protocol Monitoring: Offers versatility in overseeing diverse application ecosystems.

What benefits should be expected in reviews?

Quick ROI: Fast returns on investment through robust monitoring features.
Easy Interface: User-friendly design reducing complexity in navigation.
Enhanced Scalability: Adaptable monitoring capabilities supporting expanding infrastructures.
Minimal Development Time: Rapid application creation with familiar scripting tools.
Advantageous Licensing: Cost-effective options leveraging existing tools and technologies.

Organizations leverage OpenText Business Process Monitoring to maintain the performance of both public and internal applications, predicting and preparing for maintenance needs. It serves critical roles in strategic change, complex transaction monitoring, and ERP workflow development across various industries, ensuring consistency and effective management of change.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

June 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.