Grafana Enterprise Stack vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Grafana Labs and ITRS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while ITRS is ranked #46 with an average rating of 5.0. Grafana Labs holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ITRS’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 13 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

1,190 Views
1,166 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,901 Views
1,794 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in IT infrastructure monitoring and visualization. Based on the features and functionalities, Grafana Enterprise Stack seems to hold an advantage due to its versatility and advanced visualization options.

Features: ITRS Geneos supports real-time monitoring, offers customizable dashboards, and has a robust alerting system. Grafana Enterprise Stack is recognized for its advanced visualization capabilities, integration with numerous data sources, and a vast plugin ecosystem. Grafana's ability to handle diverse visualization needs allows it to stand out, whereas ITRS is chosen for its adaptable monitoring environment.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could improve by simplifying its deployment to reduce reliance on professional services, broadening integration capabilities, and optimizing cost-effectiveness. Grafana Enterprise Stack might enhance user accessibility with more basic support options, reduce costs associated with premium services, and expand user-friendly features to cater to less technical audiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos provides flexible deployment models but may need professional services for optimal setup. Its strong customer service is advantageous. Grafana Enterprise Stack has easy installation and excellent documentation, although premium support can require a higher investment. While ITRS has superior customer service, Grafana's straightforward deployment is appealing.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos involves higher initial costs due to possible professional service needs but delivers satisfactory ROI through specialized monitoring features. Grafana Enterprise Stack's initial expense is justified by its scalability and integration flexibility, resulting in substantial ROI for organizations maximizing its capabilities. Though ITRS could be seen as costly, Grafana's feature-rich and long-term benefits offer an appealing value.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd), Network Monitoring Software (67th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	1.2%
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
Other	97.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Gregory Diana

Managing Director at Exponential Energy (Pty) Ltd

Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points

In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"It is truly reliable."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"If Grafana Enterprise Stack could display transaction queries in dashboard format similar to New Relic, it would provide more options and capabilities for users."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."

"Data visualization – real time and historical – is a weakness."

"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The layout is good, but I think it needs some enhancement based on my experience. I might not have gotten deeper to understand more details, but I believe it needs more improvement. Scalability and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have been working for several months with Icinga, but after that, I moved forward to Zabbix, and now I might switch to Grafana Enterprise Stack. I am trying many alternatives to provide monitorin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 15% of the time

LiveAction LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 12% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 11% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 3% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2025

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.