Grafana Enterprise Stack vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

11,308 Views
5,541 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in IT infrastructure monitoring. Grafana Enterprise Stack may have the edge due to its advanced visualization and integration capabilities, whereas ScienceLogic excels in ease of deployment and support.

Features: ScienceLogic provides strong automation capabilities, enables hybrid IT operations, and offers in-depth analytics. It integrates with a wide range of environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack supports various data sources, offers customizable dashboards, and excels in data visualization.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its data visualization tools, increase customization options, and expand community resources. Grafana Enterprise Stack could improve ease of deployment, offer more intuitive setup guidance, and provide more direct support options beyond community documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is straightforward to deploy and is backed by reliable customer support, providing a comprehensive setup with guidance. Grafana Enterprise Stack, being more complex due to its extensive customization options, benefits from excellent community forums and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing is considered reasonable, with a strong return on investment through operational efficiencies. Grafana Enterprise Stack may be more expensive but offers a compelling ROI for organizations needing powerful visualization and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2026).

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ScienceLogic

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.8%
Grafana Enterprise Stack	0.8%
Other	97.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"The most valuable features for us are dashboards; we can dashboard anything that we can think of, we can dashboard and measure."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

"It is very easy to deploy and integrate with any application or infrastructure layer."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"Web monitoring, service and processes monitoring have saved and prevented more than just one outage."

"Customer Service is fantastic."

"This is the best tool ever which allowed us to consolidate from various monitoring solutions such as HPOV, CA and SCOM."

"The Power Packs that are available are amazing."

"Technical Support: The best I've ever experienced."

"We lacked the power or features that the EM7 dashboards provide, and have won more than one account based on that alone."

"I have thought long and hard about the following statement but if I had to setup another shop all over again EM7 would be the first tool I would fire up #truestory."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"I believe there are some areas for improvement in the product. Something that could be better is the time series functionality."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."

"If Grafana Enterprise Stack could display transaction queries in dashboard format similar to New Relic, it would provide more options and capabilities for users."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"We often face bugs when there's a new release."

"Overall monitoring capabilities could be improved. We run into instances where we are not able to configure monitoring for specific things and it requires quite a bit of manual labor to accomplish these tasks."

"ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"They need a little more self-service."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

What advice do you have for others considering Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack in all of our clients. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

AimBetter vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 4% of the time

Stackify vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 2% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

August 2026

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell