HackerOne vs ImmuniWeb comparison

HackerOne and ImmuniWeb are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. HackerOne is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while ImmuniWeb is ranked #28. HackerOne holds a 4.2% mindshare in ASM, compared to ImmuniWeb’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of ImmuniWeb users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 11 HackerOne reviews

5,611 Views
1,908 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

ImmuniWeb

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

2,053 Views
657 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HackerOne

ImmuniWeb

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

HackerOne and ImmuniWeb compete in the cybersecurity domain, with HackerOne having an edge in pricing and support. Meanwhile, ImmuniWeb offers a robust feature set that may justify its premium cost.

Features: HackerOne provides a community-driven vulnerability platform, comprehensive reporting, and tailored bug bounty programs focused on real-world exploits. On the other hand, ImmuniWeb offers AI-powered security testing with insights into compliance and risk management and distinct AI and automation tools for organizations requiring in-depth compliance and risk analysis.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could enhance its focus on AI-driven analytics, broader compliance insights, and more customized reporting tools. ImmuniWeb might benefit from expanding its community network, offering more flexible plan options, and enhancing its integration capabilities with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne promotes a straightforward SaaS model, enabling quick deployment with an emphasis on community support. ImmuniWeb offers cloud-based deployments and emphasizes personalized customer service and expert consultation. While HackerOne benefits from a wider user base, ImmuniWeb provides more tailored support.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne generally offers lower setup costs, presenting itself as cost-effective for companies seeking community-driven insights. ImmuniWeb's pricing tends to be higher, focused on AI and automation for more comprehensive ROI. The decision often depends on whether an organization values initial cost savings or a long-term investment in sophisticated security testing and compliance assurance.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (13th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), AI Observability (11th)

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 4.2%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HackerOne	4.2%
ImmuniWeb	1.4%
Other	94.4%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

NitishKumar

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Crowdsourced security has strengthened our bug discovery and improved vulnerability response

HackerOne is already doing well, although I believe implementing stricter SLAs for the time to first response and time to bounty would help prevent researchers' burnout, especially regarding duplicate submissions. I suggest systematic bug rewards because currently, if a researcher finds one bug in multiple places, they often only get paid for one. Improving the handling of systemic vulnerabilities would encourage deeper research. Additionally, improving multi-currency and crypto payout options would help make the platform more accessible globally.

Read full review

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

"If you are starting out as a beginner in penetration testing and want to become a professional in bug bounty, I would advise you to get started with HackerOne."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

More HackerOne pros

"I have managed to deliver to my clients the services of Ethical Hacking in less time, with better deliverables, and other key differentiators that make my company more competitive in the local market."

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent"

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

More ImmuniWeb pros

Cons

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

"Customer support can improve, as there are instances of ghosting that need to be addressed."

"Triage response time is a significant issue. The response time and triage speed are not fast enough, and this is causing many people to leave HackerOne."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

"HackerOne provides a "HackBot" which helps identify other relevant reports, including duplicates, public reports from other companies, etc. However, the functionality is limited and it would be nice to integrate it with broader services offered like auto responses, triggers, etc."

More HackerOne cons

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

"You may find the dashboard a bit complicated."

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

More ImmuniWeb cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free."

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"It is pretty expensive."

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

"It is pretty expensive."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

Triage response time is a significant issue. Many researchers are now sending reports, but there is considerable delay in responses. For example, I reported something last week that was a critical ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

I have projects and companies reaching out to me to conduct security testing and find issues in their systems. I use HackerOne for that purpose.

See all answers

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 25% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 10% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 6% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

BreachLock Penetration Testing Services vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

SiteLock vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Bitsight vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 4% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

April 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb

April 2026

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne is an industry leader in offensive security, enabling companies to identify and resolve vulnerabilities using AI and a global community of researchers. Trusted by top organizations, HackerOne enhances the software development lifecycle with comprehensive security testing.

HackerOne combines artificial intelligence with a diverse community of skilled security researchers to fortify digital ecosystems. Offering bug bounty programs, vulnerability disclosure, pentesting, and AI red teaming, HackerOne supports renowned clients like General Motors, GitHub, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Its intuitive platform simplifies vulnerability reporting and tracking, providing seamless integration with third-party tools. HackerOne's role in protecting company assets is underlined by notable accolades, achieving recognition as a Best Workplace for Innovators and a coveted spot as a Most Loved Workplace for Young Professionals.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Collaboration Tools: Enhance communication and coordination among security teams and ethical hackers.
Customizable Bounty Programs: Tailor programs to fit specific organizational needs and attract skilled researchers.
AI Capabilities: Leverage AI to detect vulnerabilities and automate workflows, boosting efficiency.
Ease of Use: Report and track vulnerabilities with a user-friendly interface, ensuring quick adoption and response.
Third-Party Integrations: Connect with external tools to streamline operations and improve report handling.

What benefits arise from using HackerOne?

Improved Security Posture: Collaborate with experts to enhance security strategies, ensuring robust defenses.
Enhanced Efficiency: Quick response times and automated processes reduce time to resolution for discovered vulnerabilities.
Comprehensive Coverage: Diverse program offerings cater to multiple sectors, empowering thorough security assessments.
Reputation Building: Collaborating with reputable partners strengthens trust and industry standing.

HackerOne is widely utilized across industries for comprehensive security testing and vulnerability management. By allowing companies to coordinate with ethical hackers, they effectively address security flaws in websites and applications. This coordination aids in regulatory compliance, protects customer trust, and serves as a central communication medium for enhancing security postures.

HackerOne

ImmuniWeb offers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions with features like extensive asset discovery, AI-driven penetration testing, and Dark Web monitoring. Known for its automated service and customer satisfaction, it facilitates seamless integration with single sign-on and provides detailed reporting functionality.

Focusing on asset discovery across websites, clouds, and networks, ImmuniWeb implements AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability detection with zero false-positives SLA. Its advanced Dark Web monitoring and efficient threat mitigation enhance cybersecurity posture. Customers benefit from its automated continuous discovery, single sign-on integration, and user-friendly dashboards. ImmuniWeb provides robust vulnerability detection and efficient remediation processes, aiming to enhance customer satisfaction within English-speaking markets.

What are the key features of ImmuniWeb?

Comprehensive Asset Discovery: Identifies assets across websites, clouds, and networks efficiently.
AI-Driven Penetration Testing: Offers testing with zero false-positives SLA for trustworthiness.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects threats and data leaks from the Dark Web.
Automated Continuous Discovery: Ensures up-to-date information on IT assets.
Single Sign-On Integration: Simplifies access for users.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Frictionless Service: Eases access to security management tools.
Detailed Reporting: Helps make informed decisions with well-organized reports.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the threat mitigation process.
Seamless Client Access: Facilitates access to dashboards for clear insights.

ImmuniWeb is widely implemented in industries focusing on IT asset management, penetration testing, and vulnerability assessments. Its features cater to fast, detailed on-demand testing while monitoring external surfaces for brand risks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for patch verification, perimeter discovery, and dark web searches to fortify defenses against data leaks and impersonation threats. By enabling efficient collaboration among teams, ImmuniWeb helps tackle urgent cybersecurity challenges and analyze complex logs.

ImmuniWeb

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

April 2026

Free Report: HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.