

OpenText Core Application Security and HackerOne are competing in the application security category. HackerOne seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and strong community support.
Features: OpenText Core Application Security offers robust application monitoring, threat detection, and integration with existing systems. HackerOne stands out with its vulnerability disclosure programs, community-driven bug bounty platform, and strong collaboration and integration with development tools.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its advanced analytic capabilities and increase the flexibility of its integration options. It may also benefit from more detailed documentation. HackerOne might improve by reducing the complexity of deployment, offering more transparent pricing options, and increasing direct available support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Application Security is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. HackerOne, though slightly more complex to deploy, benefits from extensive community support and detailed documentation assisting in effective implementation.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is considered cost-effective with a favorable ROI due to competitive pricing and efficient threat management. Despite higher initial costs, HackerOne is valued for preventing costly security breaches, delivering substantial long-term ROI through proactive vulnerability management.
HackerOne provides strong value by helping organizations find vulnerabilities faster and reduce the higher costs associated with security breaches.
We receive rewards without needing to invest any money, so the return on investment is substantial.
For someone who is starting or in the middle, it is very difficult because you can spend 20 hours sending 20 reports but none of them gets anything.
There is definitive ROI if OpenText Core Application Security is deployed properly; it substantially reduces efforts in securing the solution while averting various application-related risks.
We have priority support because we are a higher tier, and with high report volumes, the turnaround time is very good.
Technical support at HackerOne has slowed down considerably compared to four years ago.
The ease of collaboration with ethical hackers on HackerOne has been quite good.
Support tickets often stay open for one month to three months, which leads to customer frustration.
I had direct interaction with them, which facilitated how we onboarded Fortify.
The technical support from OpenText is very good.
It is a large platform with many programs and clients.
HackerOne is very scalable because we can put bounties for any number of hackers at the same time and test thoroughly.
It maintains a high signal-to-noise ratio and addresses scalability through infrastructure, triage services, and AI automation.
If a customer wants to know the tools and the technology used for their application to scan their application, they provide less information on that.
OpenText Core Application Security is highly scalable; it is running on the cloud, and elasticity is one of the best points of a cloud environment.
Fortify is superior to many solutions because of its scalability and that it does not require massive compute capabilities for its SAST and sandboxing features.
HackerOne was down for some time and the response was not good.
OpenText Core Application Security is stable and has minimal downtime, benefitting from AWS cloud availability.
More advanced AI capabilities would help prioritize reports, reduce false positives, and speed up the validation.
There are no clear guidelines for being invited to programs and conferences.
Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities.
It would be beneficial if Fortify could check for CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) in third-party libraries, which I currently use a separate dependency checker tool for.
One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together.
I would say OpenText Core Application Security is not very user-friendly in terms of price; it is quite high.
The cost is rated as one since there is no need to pay anything, not even a fee or commission.
I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.
It has a very simple user interface, and it gives you a quick response—if you submit a bug, someone reaches out to you within minutes, telling you they will verify the bug, and it can be verified in just a few days, sometimes even less than a day, which stands out for me.
HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber.
I find bug bounty programs most valuable for our organization because they invite researchers from around the globe to find bugs in our environment, allowing us to fix various severity vulnerabilities or bugs that, if left unaddressed, could lead to losing customers.
Fortify helps me find serious issues, such as developers inadvertently leaving access tokens, including API access tokens, in the source code.
On demand you have two levels of reports: the first from the tool, which is the same as we can get from Fortify on-premises, and a next level reporting made by experts from OpenText, leading to a more condensed and precise report as level three.
Additionally, you can integrate Fortify in CICD pipeline, so you get real-time updates about the security issues in your pipeline.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Application Security | 3.3% |
| HackerOne | 0.9% |
| Other | 95.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
HackerOne is an industry leader in offensive security, enabling companies to identify and resolve vulnerabilities using AI and a global community of researchers. Trusted by top organizations, HackerOne enhances the software development lifecycle with comprehensive security testing.
HackerOne combines artificial intelligence with a diverse community of skilled security researchers to fortify digital ecosystems. Offering bug bounty programs, vulnerability disclosure, pentesting, and AI red teaming, HackerOne supports renowned clients like General Motors, GitHub, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Its intuitive platform simplifies vulnerability reporting and tracking, providing seamless integration with third-party tools. HackerOne's role in protecting company assets is underlined by notable accolades, achieving recognition as a Best Workplace for Innovators and a coveted spot as a Most Loved Workplace for Young Professionals.
What key features does HackerOne offer?HackerOne is widely utilized across industries for comprehensive security testing and vulnerability management. By allowing companies to coordinate with ethical hackers, they effectively address security flaws in websites and applications. This coordination aids in regulatory compliance, protects customer trust, and serves as a central communication medium for enhancing security postures.
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.