HackerOne vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

HackerOne and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HackerOne is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. HackerOne holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 9 HackerOne reviews

4,307 Views
431 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

5,991 Views
3,774 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

HackerOne

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and HackerOne are competing in the cybersecurity industry. PortSwigger is often preferred for its pricing and support, while HackerOne is favored for its feature-rich offering.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning, customization capabilities, and a versatile API for integrations. Its built-in tools like Proxy for packet capture and Intruder allow users to simulate a wide variety of attacks efficiently. HackerOne provides a dynamic bug bounty platform and a large community of ethical hackers, enabling quick detection and resolution of security issues. Its tools support integrations with third-party systems, aiding effective vulnerability management, and unique features like a streamlined interface for bug submission and tracking.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger could enhance its out-of-box integration options and broaden its user interface customization. Additionally, expanding its user training resources could be beneficial. HackerOne might improve by streamlining initial setup processes and refining the filtering system for programs. Enhancing AI-driven suggestions for vulnerabilities and their resolutions could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is known for its intuitive setup and effective support resources, ensuring a quick deployment process. HackerOne, while requiring more initial setup due to its wider network of security experts, benefits from extensive community support, making it a robust option for ongoing service and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger is often selected for its lower cost and quick ROI due to efficient vulnerability management tools. HackerOne, though potentially more expensive, delivers substantial ROI through its proven crowdsourcing model and continuous security improvements. PortSwigger focuses on cost-effectiveness, while HackerOne emphasizes long-term security gains via community involvement.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (29th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (8th), AI Observability (10th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (5th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	2.7%
HackerOne	0.5%
Other	96.8%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ruphus Muita

Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited

Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering

I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"HackerOne has positively impacted my organization by improving external attack surface visibility, enabling faster detection of cloud and infrastructure issues, reducing MTTR through structured triage and SLAs, and enhancing our strong security posture across multi-customer environments with audit-ready reporting."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

More HackerOne pros

"The solution is stable."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the Burp Intruder tool."

"Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it."

"The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price."

"The solution scans web applications and supports APIs, which are the main features I really like."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

"It would be good if the solution could give us more details about what exactly is defective."

"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution."

"There were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it."

"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."

"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."

"The solution used to be expensive. However, they have reduced the price to approximately $400.00 which is reasonable."

"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"PortSwigger is reasonably-priced. It's fair."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

HackerOne has trust from companies such as Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which provides a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning. However, I reduced my rating by one mark because...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

I use HackerOne for the bug bounty platform to find security issues. When we discover vulnerabilities, we receive awards for them. Before testing any new payment API for public release, we can have...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 35% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 13% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 6% of the time

Crowdcurity vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 13% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

March 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

Burp

Overview

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Free Report: HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.