

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and Harness are competing in the cloud management and optimization space. Harness stands out due to its advanced features, which users feel justify its pricing despite VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's favorable pricing and support perception.
Features: VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth delivers robust cost management capabilities, efficient resource allocation, and strong analytics tools. Harness offers powerful continuous delivery, workflow automation, and advanced CI/CD pipeline management, catering to complex deployment environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides a smoother deployment experience with established support channels, quickly helping organizations leverage their cloud investments. Harness, offering significant deployment capabilities, requires more detailed setup due to its complex feature set. VMWare customer service builds trust and efficiency, whereas Harness involves deeper stakeholder collaboration during implementation.
Pricing and ROI: VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has competitive setup costs and quickly optimizes operational expenses for strong ROI. Harness, although with higher initial costs, offers value through enhanced productivity and delivery speed, leading to significant long-term benefits. VMWare emphasizes immediate cost savings, while Harness focuses on long-term development gains.
The AI features that they have and with which we can rewrite the pipeline and troubleshoot issues significantly saved time.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
CloudHealth consistently identifies optimization opportunities, resulting in an estimated twenty to thirty percent reduction in cloud infrastructure costs.
I have seen a return on investment with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. My company was very happy using this, and they did not buy another solution, so I believe they have seen benefits using this VMWare solution.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
There was an instance when I faced issues with third-party plugins, and after raising a support ticket, they responded in a few hours with a documentation link that resolved my issue.
They provide 24/7 support based on the SLA with the client, ensuring the response times are matched accordingly.
The engineers are knowledgeable and provide practical guidance for resolving cloud management and governance-related problems.
It is very interactive, with examples on how you can do this or that, and there are the do's and the don'ts.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
The backbone of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is scalability; it is very easy to scale.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is well-suited for medium to large-scale enterprise environments, capable of managing multiple AWS accounts and thousands of cloud resources and workloads across different regions from a single dashboard.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
With VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, I can help optimize services and identify the pain points where cost reduction is necessary.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is stable and reliable in my experience.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
The learning curve is steep because people like to take their own time to understand and roll out things, which creates an overhead in getting people to understand the system.
I would prefer to see more AI-driven insights that not only recommend optimization but also suggest automated remediation actions.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth can improve by introducing real-time cost visibility and alerting.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The licensing cost is a little bit too high.
The pricing is suitable for medium and large enterprises operating in multi-cloud environments that require advanced financial operations and governance capabilities.
Pricing setup is the process of configuring how the cloud costs are calculated and allocated, which includes connecting cloud billing data, defining business groups, mapping resource tags, and setting custom rates if required.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
If something goes wrong, I can use AI troubleshooting to build or test my fails and analyze the logs, suggesting the fixes.
Governance and policy management help enforce governance policies by identifying missing tags, non-compliant resources, public storage, and other configuration issues, ensuring organizations maintain security and operational standards across different cloud environments like GCP, AWS, and Azure.
With this, we have right-sized many instances, removed many unused EBS volumes, and unused Elastic IPs. In that way, we have cut around 20% of cost.
CloudHealth identifies underutilized or idle resources and provides right-sizing recommendations, helping organizations reduce unnecessary cloud spending while maintaining application performance.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Harness | 2.1% |
| VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth | 3.9% |
| Other | 94.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.
What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.