

Pega Platform and HCL Domino compete in the enterprise software category, focusing on workflow automation and collaboration. Pega Platform may have an advantage due to its advanced automation capabilities and enterprise-level scalability, whereas HCL Domino's strengths lie in security and stability.
Features: Pega Platform offers robust case management, BPM, and integration services, making it highly configurable and suitable for rapid deployment. HCL Domino provides secure messaging, collaboration features, and excellent integration across systems, along with noteworthy data encryption for their case management.
Room for Improvement: Pega Platform needs to improve its user interface and customer support, especially to address concerns over scalability and licensing complexity for smaller businesses. HCL Domino should enhance its UI, integration capabilities, and client speed to offer a more modern interface and improved collaboration tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega Platform supports diverse deployment options and cloud flexibility, providing scalable solutions, although customer service can be slow during complex issues. HCL Domino traditionally focuses on on-premises deployment, with generally fast support for known issues, but its older system architecture can complicate advanced customization.
Pricing and ROI: Pega Platform has high licensing costs aimed at larger enterprises but offers significant ROI through advanced features. Its licensing may be restrictive for SMEs. HCL Domino offers competitive pricing, mainly in subscription models, but ROI is not as impressive due to higher ongoing costs without proportional functionality enhancements.
I estimate that projects take days rather than weeks when using Pega Platform compared to traditional coding.
Pega Platform has positively impacted my organization, as they were using different technology before and have seen tremendous success and return on investment, so they are very happy.
The technical support from Pega is very low, rating a one or two out of ten.
I never needed support from the platform standpoint, but if additional features are required, we have regular meetings with the product team for feedback.
Pega's technical support team is very helpful.
Currently, big banking providers and insurance providers, even the members for healthcare payers, are using more than millions of operations on a daily or weekly basis.
In-line editing of documents and a document viewer are functionalities that would be beneficial.
There are always areas for improvement, which they are addressing in every part of the patch releases.
With the recent development of AI agents in Pega Platform 24.2, the adoption is not heavy due to regulations around using external LLM by customers, especially regulated customers in BFSS and healthcare.
Pega introduced Constellation, which allows a user to build a more engaging visual experience.
The Notes client is very expensive, costing around $105 per client.
Pega is priced higher than open-source options like Flowable but is suitable for large-scale industries like banking and insurance.
The pricing is expensive, and this is an issue.
From a licensing perspective, it is higher than the competition.
Its hybrid nature allows the use of both web-based applications and Notes client-based applications.
Pega Platform has positively impacted my organization by providing faster application development than traditional methods.
Pega Platform is excellent for enterprise-level solutions with integrations to entire systems, including case management, service orchestration, CRM, decision-making capabilities, digital process automation, and AI-driven functionalities.
Management capabilities such as dashboards.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Pega Platform | 5.7% |
| HCL Domino | 1.0% |
| Other | 93.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 69 |
HCL Domino (formerly IBM Domino) is a secure, enterprise-grade, application development platform. From IT to business, HCL Domino is the only low to pro-code application development platform that allows your business to build robust applications to solve workflow and process challenges fast. HCL Domino powers businesses around the world with 15,000 customers and 10 million apps built on our platform. HCL Domino has always been a secure, rock-solid, and proven solution.
Pega Platform provides flexible business process management with a focus on rapid application development and automation through a low-code approach, enhancing efficiency across sectors.
Pega Platform is renowned for its ability to streamline operations with robust automation features, including robotic process automation and decision-making capabilities. Its intuitive interface and workflow management contribute to a reputation for enhancing business processes. Although users face challenges with integration limitations and high licensing costs, they benefit from rapid deployment and efficient process adaptations. The unified architecture reduces complexity, while case management and integration services support digital transformations in sectors such as banking, insurance, and healthcare.
What are the key features of Pega Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
In industries like insurance, banking, healthcare, and government, Pega Platform is implemented to automate diverse workflows, supporting initiatives from claims processing to customer onboarding. Enterprises use Pega for case management and digital transformations, valuing its out-of-the-box integrations and real-time reporting capabilities to boost operational automation and enhance customer experiences.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.