Heimdal Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations comparison

Heimdal and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Heimdal is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.4. Heimdal holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Heimdal users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Heimdal Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud compete in providing robust protection for enterprise systems. Kaspersky emerges as the more advanced solution with superior features, making it a worthwhile investment.

Features: Heimdal focuses on proactive threat detection, patch management, and network traffic insights. Kaspersky offers comprehensive security controls, AI-driven threat analysis, and centralized management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky offers streamlined cloud-based deployment with responsive technical support. Heimdal presents a more complex setup requiring manual configuration but benefits from personalized customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Heimdal presents a cost-effective solution with a lower initial setup cost. Kaspersky justifies its higher setup costs with enhanced capabilities and higher operational efficiency, resulting in long-term value appreciation.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heimdal Endpoint Security is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud	0.7%
Heimdal Endpoint Security	0.6%
Other	95.3%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

DEEPAK KUMAR PACHDEO DUBEY

Senior IT Support Specialist at PXGEO

Delivers efficiency and agility with USB control limitations

One area where we lag is that, since we use everything from Heimdal, including XDR and other features, we also use the privilege manager feature called Elevation. What we lack is granular USB control. We have an issue where we can only switch USB on or off. I want to whitelist specific devices in the network, which I currently cannot do.

Read full review

Zunair Aftab

Supports Engineer at Rawad IT Solutions

Security features excel while management tools face challenges

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has proven to be a robust and comprehensive solution for endpoint protection. So far, no major negative features have been observed. However, email security integration with Microsoft 365 has room for improvement. In a recent real-world incident, a company received 10 phishing emails, of which only three were blocked by the system. Enhancing detection accuracy to block 7 or more would significantly improve trust and effectiveness. With the on-premises version, there's a known issue where assigning a device to a new group results in it being auto-assigned back to the previous group. Fixing this bug would greatly streamline device management. Additionally, in the cloud version, once a device is assigned to a user, it cannot be reassigned without deleting the user or the device entirely. It would be far more user-friendly if the platform allowed simple reassignment or de-assignment, returning the device to an "unassigned" state. As for automated behavioral analysis, while current functionality is based on machine learning, upgrading to true AI-powered detection could bring substantial improvements. Ideally, the system should proactively flag potential threats, and offer administrators the option to either allow or block applications based on intelligent risk analysis

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks saves time in various ways, although the user interface is fairly standard."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"There are a lot of lead solutions in this space, however, Palo Alto is number one."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"As compared to multiple solutions I have used in the past, Heimdal is a very agile and lightweight solution."

"Heimdal is a very agile and lightweight solution."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"The most valuable component of the solution is the malware detection feature."

"All features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are perfect, and I am interested in working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud."

"The standout features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud include its cloud-based console and the simplicity of managing endpoints."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective."

"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pros

Cons

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information. It has a limited amount of information right now. It is customizable, but I'd love to see a better out-of-box dashboard."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"There's an overall lack of features."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"There's room for improvement with Mac device installations, which can be challenging."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"What we lack is granular USB control."

"What we lack is granular USB control. We have an issue where we can only switch USB on or off."

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

"Recently, there was a company which was attacked by phishing emails, and out of 10, it was only blocking three emails."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."

"Kaspersky's cloud solution should be improved because the on-premises features are unavailable in the cloud."

"The tool's update management can be better. In future releases, the addition of a DLP module would be valuable."

"It requires specific expertise or certified professionals to deploy the product. There is a need to expand the offerings to various industries covering different-sized businesses."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"The platform is expensive."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"The product is averagely priced."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heimdal Endpoint Security?

Pricing, compared to what we had before, was quite economical. There was a difference of about twenty percent or some...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Heimdal Endpoint Security?

One area where we lag is that, since we use everything from Heimdal, including XDR and other features, we also use th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Heimdal Endpoint Security?

My company colleagues and I use this antivirus solution. I am part of a company where I deploy solutions, and I also ...

See all answers

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

No advise, its pretty simple

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

I cannot find another problem.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Heimdal Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Heimdal Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs Heimdal Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Heimdal Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Coro vs Heimdal Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Heimdal Endpoint Security Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

April 2026

Download Heimdal Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

March 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Heimdal Next-Gent Endpoint Antivirus, Thor Vigilance Enterprise, Heimdal Endpoint Detection and Response, Heimdal DNS Security - Endpoint, Heimdal Threat Prevention, Heimdal Ransomware Encryption Protection

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Heimdal Endpoint Security, is a comprehensive suite of security tools designed to safeguard devices from a range of cyber threats. Offering functionalities like Next-Generation Antivirus, Endpoint Detection and Response, Application Control, Firewall, and Mobile Device Management, Heimdal ensures a multi-layered defense against malware, suspicious activities, and unauthorized applications. Its benefits include proactive threat detection, enhanced efficiency through task automation, centralized management for streamlined administration, and dedicated mobile device security features. Targeted primarily at businesses and organizations of all sizes, Heimdal Endpoint Security caters to the diverse cybersecurity needs of modern enterprises, providing robust protection against evolving threats.

Heimdal

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.

This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?

Self-Protection Mechanism: Defends against unauthorized changes and ensure operation stability.
Malware Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats with high accuracy.
Cloud-Based Endpoint Management: Simplifies management across devices with a centralized console.
Microsoft Office 365 Integration: Enhances security and productivity in collaborative environments.
Vulnerability Assessments: Provides insights into potential security weaknesses.
Anti-Phishing & Anti-Malware: Protects against harmful emails and web content.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Performance: Consistent security measures against complex threats.
Detailed Reporting: Offers in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Covers a wide range of threats including malware and phishing.
Integration Capability: Easily integrates with other security solutions and platforms.

Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Brother, Symbion, CPH West

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Ransomware Protection vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.