No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Sophos Endpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (25th)
Sophos Endpoint
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management and Sophos Endpoint aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Heimdal Patch and Asset Management is designed for Patch Management and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Sophos Endpoint, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.6% since last year.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management0.6%
NinjaOne7.9%
Microsoft Configuration Manager7.8%
Other83.7%
Patch Management
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sophos Endpoint1.4%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint7.8%
CrowdStrike Falcon6.6%
Other84.2%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
Sabbir Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Infosonik Systems Ltd
Experience significant threat prevention advancements with user-friendly deployment
The feature is called relay server, and some people refer to it as a cache server. The Sophos EPP Suite is scalable. Some customers in banks typically have 5,000 to 7,000 users. One customer started with 1,000 users and has now extended to 4,000 users. Some customers are using up to 8,000 users without any issues. Regarding AI elements in the Sophos EPP Suite, firewalls have already introduced AI features. They have integrated AI models similar to ChatGPT in firewalls. These AI features should be introduced in endpoint XDR as well. Key features for comprehensive detection and prevention include advanced threat prevention, ransomware protections, exploit prevention, and AI-powered detections. Extended visibility and data analysis include cross-product data correlations. They have a data lake, live discover, and threat graphs. They also offer AI case summary and AI common analysis, accessible from Sophos Central, which is the management portal for Sophos XDR. Sophos Central serves as one central management portal for managing firewalls, endpoint, Sophos encryption, and mobile device management solutions. This centralized management is particularly appealing to customers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"It was successful in preventing malware distribution."
"Synchronized security is a great feature because my firewall knows exactly what is happening in my endpoint and it takes my production level one step higher."
"Provides good control and can implement policies and on-the-web control."
"The protection that this solution offers us is strong."
"The solution is very stable, with no significant bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."
"The Sophos people here in South Africa are very helpful."
"The central management console is valuable, as it consolidates everything into one place, allowing users to access logs and events without visiting multiple websites or consoles."
"Really I could give it a nine because I can recommend the product as an excellent solution."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"Deployment and central management need to be improved."
"In my country, having an on-premises deployment model is preferred. In this part of the world, on-premises is still the way many companies want to go."
"Lacks delegated administration privileges for large organizations, and differential permissions for admins."
"We use cloud services quite a bit. Therefore, I would like to see integration with other security tools besides endpoint so that I'm not managing different tools separately. I would prefer to have a single security solution for my laptop and for managing other security things like passwords."
"Configuring notifications is lagging a bit behind the curve as the product should be able to direct exactly where any notification type is sent."
"In my country, having an on-premises deployment model is preferred. In this part of the world, on-premises is still the way many companies want to go. Therefore, they should supply some sort of option that allows for that reality."
"From our enrollment perspective, I would say maybe it could be a little lighter in terms of agent usage so that there is less computer utilization."
"There could be enhancements made to the DLP."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"There is an annual license to use the solution."
"We are on an annual license to use the solution."
"The solution is expensive."
"I rate the price of Sophos EPP Suite a four out of five."
"We purchased a three-year license, which gave us a large discount."
"The solution for an enterprise license costs around 13 million Philippine pesos."
"Sophos EPP Suite is a competitive and affordable solution."
"There are licenses to use this solution and we are on a three-year license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Agriculture
10%
University
8%
Transportation Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business45
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos EPP Suite?
The setup cost is good and licensing is good. The pricing is slightly increased, but it is good because Sophos Endpoint has a lot of features. I appreciate the pricing and licensing as well.
What needs improvement with Sophos EPP Suite?
I would give Sophos Endpoint a rating of nine out of ten because it is working very well. I have cut one point because it has no solution for on-premises. Additionally, it has no solution for any L...
What is your primary use case for Sophos EPP Suite?
I am using Sophos Endpoint to protect our environment from malware, and I am also using it for web control and application control. I have a main case with Sophos Endpoint that includes peripheral ...
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
EPP Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
EK Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Vicarius and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.