HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs NetApp Private Storage comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.7% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

18,803 Views
4,889 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

NetApp Private Storage

Read 15 NetApp Private Storage reviews

3,643 Views
3,643 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

NetApp Private Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and NetApp Private Storage compete in the data management category. HPE 3PAR holds the upper hand in thin provisioning and flexible scalability, while NetApp excels in cloud integration and unified storage.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers features like thin provisioning, ASIC-based operation, and adaptive optimization. Its integration with various technologies and high performance through ASIC design are notable. NetApp Private Storage is known for smooth cloud integration, unified storage capabilities, and flexible management, providing seamless cloud and on-premises handling.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR needs enhancements in firmware stability, user guides, and data deduplication. It also seeks improvements in automation tools. NetApp's setup can be complex, requiring more user-friendly interfaces and faster support responses. Both brands face criticism over licensing structures but deal differently with cloud integration issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment is generally straightforward for both products, with HPE 3PAR noted for flexible scalability and seamless on-premises integration. NetApp provides broad deployment options, especially with cloud environments. HPE is praised for reliable technical support and proactive issue resolution, whereas NetApp experiences varied support responses.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is expensive but valued for its performance and innovative features, justifying the investment. Users indicate varied ROI perceptions, citing reduced management costs and improved throughput. NetApp's pricing is also high, but its flexibility and cloud integration offer operational efficiencies. However, some users question its value compared to cost when choosing between these options.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (10th)

NetApp Private Storage

Ranking in NAS

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 4.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Private Storage is 4.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	4.7%
NetApp Private Storage	4.4%
Other	90.9%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Atilla Celiloglu

Broadcast Technology Director at tv8

Has supported continuous broadcasting with reliable performance and consistent operations

They can make more solutions for cloud integration in NetApp Private Storage. It should be easier to use the cloud S3 integration, maybe from a NetApp interface, where users can choose the type of storage before sending to S3. I would like to see more audit and performance logs via cloud integrations and ONTAP. Without the need for separate software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It all works in concert using Recovery Manager Central (RMC). HPE coordinates it all, so it is more of a solution instead of products trying to do things together."

"3PAR is easy to keep running and does not require too much effort. It has been very reliable, which is key."

"We use all the features, but some of the most valuable are the replication, priority optimization, provisioning, and deduplication. There are a lot of good features in this product."

"The most valuable feature of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is its storage capabilities."

"Our applications are now at least two to four times faster."

"At the end of the day, 3PAR was the most valuable."

"You can scale it out almost indefinitely."

"The solution is stable."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"In terms of quality and uptime, it is the thing to have."

"NetApp is faster than other storage brands."

"The most valuable feature of NetApp Private Storage is out-of-the-box integration with the SAN switches. They are much easier compared to Dell solutions. Additionally, the connector that comes with the solution that allows connection back to the Cisco SAN switches is very good. In Dell, I would need to use an FCIP or CIP port that is required."

"We feel that NetApp gave us a platform (base) which could clearly arrange all our files and volumes."

"They have the scalability that we need, that we ask for, and I think it is a very, very good solution."

"We get our data faster and it's very reliable; we don't go down."

"For recording and stability, NetApp Private Storage is the best."

"The beauty is it's worth it."

More NetApp Private Storage pros

Cons

"The management console could use some work. All the functionality is there, of course, but it can be hard to find some features or do certain tasks."

"The new feature sets, like deduplication and compression, are complex to work with. I hope when I view the roadmap that they will be less complex."

"On certain of their features that we have to use to migrate data, it tends to go off for about 60 or 90 seconds toward the end of the work."

"The product is quite expensive."

"Deduplication on FC disks needs improvement."

"The tool has low storage and low performance. This can be solved by adding more disco to the solution. The product’s pricing is also suited for enterprise businesses rather than smaller ones.I would like to see better performance, UI, and compatibility with other products in future releases."

"We have had a few issues with it. We had our virtual environment lock up a few times on storage-based things. We think we have it sorted out, but maybe it came down to a configuration issue on it."

"During the initial setup, it was a bit complex in the wiring of the cages."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"There is room for improvement in the support. It has been a problem for our team."

"This product is probably one of the most complex to set up on the market."

"There may actually be so many features that the end-user gets lost in the volume."

"The documentation could be improved."

"They need a little more technical people in Akola."

"The hardware does not last as long as it could with new software."

"If you overthink provisioning, if you over-allocate, if it gets full, or if something crazy happens and you haven't been watching, then you can lose data."

"The users find the new version's GUI complicated to use."

More NetApp Private Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have to renew support in October for the existing solution. That will cost me roughly $50,000 this year, which in the grand scheme of things, $50,000 is not that much compared to paying $850,000. However, it will be the last year that I'll be able to get direct support from HPE. Therefore, product has to be replaced in 2020."

"We don't pay for any licensing fees."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit on the higher side, but it is an awesome product."

"I would like it to be cheaper."

"We purchased the solution as CapEx and we only pay support now. I find the pricing fantastic."

"To be more competitive, as customer, we need a more aggressive price that includes all the licenses available."

"It is fairly inexpensive to scale."

"Take advantage of what HPE offers as far as professional services, and this will help you make the right decision."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price of NetApp Private Storage is similar to other solutions. There is typically an annual license required for this solution."

"In general, I am pleased with the pricing, though it is a little high."

"NetApp Private Storage is cheaper here in India compared to other solutions, such as Dell."

"The product is costly."

"The price could be lower."

"We negotiate whatever deal we can get on the type of storage that it is, but it's totally under our control,."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Private Storage?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Private Storage?

It consists of a large production company and national television channels broadcasting 24/7. We wanted to choose a stable product with flawless SLA levels for an organization that broadcasts 24/7....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NetApp Private Storage?

I believe it will deliver the expected performance and stability for television channels and production studios. On a scale of 1-10, I rate NetApp Private Storage an 8.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Nimble Storage vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 13% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 10% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 7% of the time

FreeNAS vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Hitachi NAS Platform vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 6% of the time

More NetApp Private Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

September 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Private Storage

September 2026

Download NetApp Private Storage product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

NPS

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetApp Private Storage provides efficient, cost-controlled storage solutions with fast, seamless cloud integration, ensuring robust security and scalability for diverse applications.

NetApp Private Storage integrates smoothly with cloud platforms like Azure or AWS, offering a unified approach to storage through the ONTAP operating system. With SAN integration, disaster recovery, and strong security measures, it supports scalability and diverse use cases. Users appreciate its effective backup solutions and reliability, enhanced by Snapshot functionality. However, enhanced cloud integration tools and user-friendly interface improvements are desired. Users often confront configuration complexity and support access issues, along with costly upgrade cycles due to hardware limitations.

What are the key features of NetApp Private Storage?

ONTAP Operating System: Facilitates unified storage management across platforms.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connections with cloud providers like AWS and Azure.
Disaster Recovery: Provides robust options to safeguard data.
Security Measures: Offers strong protection against potential threats.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing storage demands.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Control: Allows efficient management of storage expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex storage management tasks.
Speed: Enhances data processing and access times.
Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across applications.
Flexibility: Adapts to a variety of storage environments and needs.

NetApp Private Storage is employed in industries requiring robust storage solutions, supporting OpenStack cloud backends, VMware environments, and media broadcasts. It aids in database server replication and hybrid flash storage, managing marketing data and facilitating ESXi backend solutions through NFS shares, SnapMirror, and file replication. Recognized for simplifying storage management and connectivity, it efficiently supports demanding applications across sectors.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

ASE IT, Concerto Cloud

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

September 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.