HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #21, while NetApp is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.6% mindshare in CS, compared to NetApp’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

HPE File Storage and Object...

Read 3 HPE File Storage and Object Storage reviews

2,500 Views
1,100 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

12,211 Views
4,152 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE File Storage and Object...

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

HPE File Storage and Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP both compete in the storage solutions market. Users favor NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for its scalability and integration features, while HPE File Storage and Object Storage are preferred for cost-effectiveness and simplicity in management.

Features: HPE File Storage and Object Storage are praised for their flexibility, capacity to handle large volumes of data, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is highly valued for its comprehensive data protection, performance optimization, and hybrid cloud capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users highlight that HPE File Storage and Object Storage could benefit from enhanced analytics and monitoring tools, as well as improved support for higher workloads. For NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, there are calls for more streamlined updates and better cost transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE File Storage and Object Storage are often praised for their easy setup process and reliable customer support. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is commended for its smooth deployment in hybrid environments and strong technical support team.

Pricing and ROI: HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer competitive pricing, with users noting a quicker ROI due to lower setup costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, while more expensive initially, promises a significant ROI due to its enhanced features and performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE File Storage and Object...

Ranking in Cloud Storage

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (26th)

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Storage

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Backup (26th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of HPE File Storage and Object Storage is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 4.6%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	4.6%
HPE File Storage and Object Storage	1.6%
Other	93.8%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Luiz Gasparelo

Owner at Lnetwork

Has robust security features ensuring data protection, and clients benefits from fast access to integrated data

The best features of HPE Cloud Object Storage include easy management, scalability, and unified access to both object and block storage. Security measures are robust, ensuring data protection, and clients benefit from fast access to integrated data across different platforms like Cisco, Microsoft SQL, and Palantir in a unified view.

Read full review

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a scalable solution that is available when we need it."

"It is a good product and I recommend it to other people and organizations who are exploring it as an option."

"One of the features offered and used by many clients is file-sharing."

"The best features of HPE Cloud Object Storage include easy management, scalability, and unified access to both object and block storage. Security measures are robust, ensuring data protection, and clients benefit from fast access to integrated data across different platforms like Cisco, Microsoft SQL, and Palantir in a unified view."

"The feedback from our clients is that it is very stable, they are very happy with it, and updates are completed on a regular basis and well documented."

"The feature which I like the most is that it has the capabilities that the traditional storage system offers. It provides all the functionality. The deduplication and compression work exactly like ONTAP's traditional storage. So people who have experience with that find it very easy to manage."

"The stability has been really good."

"Multiprotocol is the most valuable because Amazon was not able to provide us with access to the same data from Linux and from Windows clients. That was our value proposition for CVO, Cloud Volumes ONTAP."

"If you have a fair amount of experience with NetApp, you can work on it very easily."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it makes our data readily available and we don't have to go through a lot of trouble to access it."

"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is easy to use and gets the job done, and the granular ability to divide up the performance and the amount of storage you want is really fantastic."

"By implementing Cloud Volumes ONTAP in the Azure portal, we eliminated the cost of additional hardware and everything you have to maintain on-prem in a physical environment and put it up to the cloud."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"Our customers in Canada cannot use it because it has to be compliant in the same country."

"At present, the initial setup is slow."

"Technical support is not available locally for us."

"The biggest disadvantage to this product is the technical support and pricing."

"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP should improve its support."

"The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud."

"From what I've seen with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, the delivered performance doesn't match the performance that I select; it's about half."

"The solution is not stable when using single nodes. This is a problem. NetApp should work on this solution to make it more stable with HA nodes and resolve this issue."

"There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."

"I would like to see something from NetApp about backups. I know that NetApp offers some backup for Office 365, but I would like to see something from NetApp for more backup solutions."

"They definitely need to stay more on top of security vulnerabilities."

"The support is good in general but the initial, frontline support could be improved."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is based on a per terabyte basis."

"HPE Cloud Object Storage is competitively priced and offers a good value for its solution. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Pricing is middle of the road, but it seems that it should be less expensive."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."

"If we wanted to use the AWS solution, we would have to manage two or three different platforms and pay more money than what we should have to pay, as some of the features don't even exist. If we wanted to, we could use AWS cloning, but it is useless because it uses more space, is more expensive, and takes more time."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell ObjectScale vs HPE File Storage and Object Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs HPE File Storage and Object Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Nasuni vs HPE File Storage and Object Storage

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs HPE File Storage and Object Storage

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs HPE File Storage and Object Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE File Storage and Object Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

October 2026

HPE File Storage and Object Storage report

Download HPE File Storage and Object Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

October 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

HP Cloud Object Storage

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer robust data management designed for scalability and flexibility, enhancing enterprise operations with efficient data handling.

This storage system supports enterprise growth by providing adaptable and performant data solutions. With seamless integration and management capabilities, it allows organizations to streamline data workflows across distributed environments. Offering both file and object storage solutions, it ensures secure, consistent, and efficient data accessibility, catering to modern data demands.

What are the key features of HPE File Storage and Object Storage?

Scalability: Easily expand storage capacity to meet increasing data volume needs.
Data Protection: Advanced security to safeguard sensitive information.
Integration: Effortlessly integrates with existing IT environments for smooth operations.
Performance: Optimized to deliver high-speed data access and processing.

What are the expected benefits and ROI from implementing HPE File Storage and Object Storage?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through streamlined management.
Improved Productivity: Enhances data availability and access speeds for users.
Security Assurance: Provides peace of mind with strong data protection measures.

HPE File Storage and Object Storage are implemented in industries such as healthcare and financial services, where data integrity and quick access are critical. In healthcare, it stores and protects patient records, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. In finance, it enables secure transaction data management, supporting efficient and reliable financial operations.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Hexaware, Snagajob

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

November 2026

Free Report: HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.