Top HPE File Storage and Object Storage Competitors
Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE File Storage and Object Storage based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include MinIO, Pure Storage FlashBlade, and Dell ObjectScale.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage appeal due to their scalability and integration, offering comprehensive support. In comparison, MinIO provides a high-performance distributed architecture with flexible deployment, ideal for organizations valuing security and a customizable open-source approach.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have higher setup costs compared to MinIO, emphasizing more initial investment for deployment. MinIO offers a more cost-effective setup option, catering to budget-conscious projects.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have higher setup costs compared to MinIO, emphasizing more initial investment for deployment. MinIO offers a more cost-effective setup option, catering to budget-conscious projects.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage highlight robust data management and scalability, appealing to those seeking efficient solutions. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade emphasizes fast performance and handling unstructured data, ideal for buyers needing speed and versatility in their storage systems.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer strong scalability and integration capabilities suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Dell ObjectScale provides advanced hybrid cloud features and enhanced data protection, justifying its higher cost with long-term value for future-proofing storage needs.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer better support and pricing options. In comparison, Amazon EFS excels with its seamless scalability and robust integration with AWS services. HPE stands out for performance and reliability, while Amazon EFS justifies its higher cost with extensive features and integration.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have a lower setup cost compared to Amazon EFS. Amazon EFS offers flexible scalability but with higher initial setup expenses.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have a lower setup cost compared to Amazon EFS. Amazon EFS offers flexible scalability but with higher initial setup expenses.
Nasuni excels in seamless data integration and cloud capabilities. In comparison, HPE stands out with robust security features and scalability. Nasuni is cost-effective for cloud storage, whereas HPE's extensive features justify its higher price point for many buyers.
Nasuni has a higher initial setup cost compared to HPE File Storage and Object Storage, making HPE the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Nasuni has a higher initial setup cost compared to HPE File Storage and Object Storage, making HPE the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage appeal with flexible pricing and strong cloud integration suitable for various workloads. In comparison, NetApp StorageGRID attracts with advanced data lifecycle management features and automation, offering strategic value for buyers prioritizing long-term durability and scalability.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage prioritize reliability and integration, suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive management. In comparison, Qumulo emphasizes scalability and efficient data handling, allowing businesses to grow swiftly and economically. Buyers may choose HPE for integration or Qumulo for scalability.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer competitive pricing and strong support services. In comparison, Scality RING provides advanced features and multi-cloud support, appealing to tech buyers seeking flexibility and reliability. HPE is ideal for simplicity, while Scality RING suits complex, scalable solutions.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage offers an affordable setup cost, while Scality RING provides a higher initial investment. The key difference lies in their setup costs, with HPE being cost-effective compared to Scality.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage offers an affordable setup cost, while Scality RING provides a higher initial investment. The key difference lies in their setup costs, with HPE being cost-effective compared to Scality.
Dropbox Business - Enterprise offers intuitive collaboration and ease of use with competitive pricing. In comparison, HPE File Storage and Object Storage excel in scalability and integration with legacy systems, making them ideal for complex environments.
Dropbox Business - Enterprise typically has lower setup costs compared to HPE File Storage and Object Storage, which tends to have a more complex setup leading to higher initial expenses.
Dropbox Business - Enterprise typically has lower setup costs compared to HPE File Storage and Object Storage, which tends to have a more complex setup leading to higher initial expenses.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage attract businesses with a need for high security and scalability. In comparison, Amazon FSx's integration with AWS ecosystems provides versatility for specific workloads. Tech buyers value HPE for cost efficiency, while Amazon FSx is chosen for long-term ROI through scalability.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have higher setup costs compared to Amazon FSx. The significant cost difference makes Amazon FSx a more economically attractive option for users prioritizing price.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have higher setup costs compared to Amazon FSx. The significant cost difference makes Amazon FSx a more economically attractive option for users prioritizing price.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage excel in scalability and data availability, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, IBM Cloud Object Storage enhances advanced data retrieval and security, suitable for entities needing superior features and willing to invest for long-term returns.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while IBM Cloud Object Storage may involve more variable setup expenses, potentially affecting budgeting and deployment considerations.
HPE File Storage and Object Storage have a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while IBM Cloud Object Storage may involve more variable setup expenses, potentially affecting budgeting and deployment considerations.
