HPE StoreEasy vs Qumulo comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Qumulo are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Qumulo is ranked #11. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.8% mindshare in N, compared to Qumulo’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,282 Views
631 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Qumulo

Read 8 Qumulo reviews

1,537 Views
752 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

Qumulo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE StoreEasy and Qumulo both compete in the enterprise storage solutions category. HPE StoreEasy appears to have an edge due to its affordability and customer support, while Qumulo shines with its advanced features and scalability.

Features: HPE StoreEasy offers efficient storage management, seamless Windows integration, and strong data protection features. It provides simplicity in operations, making it ideal for environments heavily reliant on Windows. Qumulo features scalability, real-time analytics, and cross-protocol access, catering to organizations that prioritize advanced analytics and flexibility in data management.

Room for Improvement: HPE StoreEasy could enhance its scalability options and integrate with more cloud services to match evolving enterprise needs. More advanced data analytics could also make it more competitive. Qumulo may benefit from simplifying its setup process, offering better initial support, and potentially lowering its total cost of ownership for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE StoreEasy is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service that assists in rapid issue resolution. Qumulo, while offering a complex setup process that demands detailed planning, promises significant long-term gains through its support, provided the investment is made appropriately in understanding its flexible deployment.

Pricing and ROI: HPE StoreEasy is considered cost-effective, focusing on minimizing setup costs and delivering solid ROI. It appeals to budget-conscious enterprises seeking stable and reliable storage solutions. Qumulo requires a higher initial expenditure but is designed for long-term savings with enhanced data management and scalability, aligning well with organizations looking for operational efficiency over time.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qumulo

Ranking in NAS

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 4.8%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 6.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

VinceVitro

Senior Storage Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support

One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to manage. There is a management console that comes with StoreEasy. It simplifies managing storage permission. There is snapshot scheduling as well. The updates and everything else is good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication."

"I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"StoreEasy offers reliable file services, which is a critical factor for customers looking for solid infrastructure."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"The most valuable feature of HPE StoreEasy is the storing of virtual machines."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

"It is a very stable product. I never faced any issues."

"The most valuable feature of Qumulo is the ability to share files and reliability."

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are the ease of management and special permissions that are quick to enable. The overall performance of the solution is good."

"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

Cons

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"There is a default Windows installation. Sometimes, when it crashes, the HPE support team asks the customer to reinstall it. That is the only issue customers are facing."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

"Some anti-theft permissions do not transfer well to Qumulo."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 51% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 9% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo

Compared 24% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 14% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 10% of the time

Scality RING vs Qumulo

Compared 9% of the time

Nasuni vs Qumulo

Compared 7% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

June 2025

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

June 2025

Download Qumulo product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

No data available

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Qumulo is a data storage and management platform that promotes object-based storage for users, backup archives, and surveillance. Its primary use case is to provide a cost-effective and feature-rich solution for managing large data.

Qumulo's data protection algorithm ensures the safety of node data, while its integration with backup platforms like Veeam and Veritas makes it easy to manage backups. The platform offers a good balance between operational cost and complexity versus feature set, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes.

Qumulo

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo

June 2025

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.