

HPE Zerto Software and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP compete in the data management and disaster recovery category. While HPE Zerto Software offers a compelling pricing and support structure, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP’s comprehensive capabilities justify its price.
Features: HPE Zerto Software is strong in disaster recovery, continuous data protection, and migration, ensuring minimal data loss and quick recovery. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP excels in data management, storage efficiency, and cloud integration, providing robust data protection.
Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance its services as focus shifts towards HPE VME, impacting features like orchestration. Additional analytics integration would bolster capability for data-driven decision making. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP’s extensive capabilities make deployment complex across environments, and simplifying this process would enhance user experience. Fine-tuning storage cost control features would offer better value for money.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software provides straightforward deployment with efficient support, aiding in quick implementation and resolution of issues. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers streamlined deployment and comprehensive support despite complex integrations, appreciated for versatility across multiple cloud environments.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software’s competitive pricing yields solid ROI for businesses prioritizing disaster recovery. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP’s higher setup cost is offset by long-term ROI benefits from improved storage management and data protection features, making it a worthwhile investment.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
My opinion is that support is generally very good. There are instances where they take longer to respond or resolve issues, especially when customers have urgent needs, but ultimately, resolution is achieved.
It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
The granular ability to divide up the performance and the amount of storage you want is really fantastic.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 5.4% |
| NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP | 6.5% |
| Other | 88.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 92 |
| Large Enterprise | 195 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.