Oracle Access Manager vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management comparison

i-Sprint Innovations and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. i-Sprint Innovations is ranked #28, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.3. i-Sprint Innovations holds a 1.2% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of i-Sprint Innovations users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Read 2 i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management reviews

966 Views
299 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,227 Views
1,141 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and Oracle Access Manager compete in the access management category. Oracle Access Manager has the upper hand for its comprehensive feature set and perceived value despite its higher price, while i-Sprint is noted for its favorable pricing and support.

Features: i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is valued for ease of integration, scalability, and overall cost-effectiveness. Oracle Access Manager is commended for advanced security features, flexibility, and a comprehensive feature set offering more extensive solutions.

Room for Improvement: i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management users suggest enhanced reporting capabilities, improved mobile support, and additional functionality. Oracle Access Manager users recommend better documentation, an improved configuration process, and user-friendly enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management deploys quickly and has high customer satisfaction with support. Oracle Access Manager, while having a longer deployment time, provides robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is considered cost-effective with a quick ROI. Oracle Access Manager, despite higher initial costs, offers extensive functionality and a strong long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Ranking in Access Management

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (25th), Authentication Systems (30th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Access Manager	2.0%
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management	1.2%
Other	96.8%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Nobuyuki Ohkawa

CEO at ABILITY LIMITED

A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing

The solution has high support capability. The tool needs to improve its cloud service capability. I have been working with the solution for 15 years. I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. I would rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten since it is highly scalable. We…

Read full review

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has high support capability."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

"The most important functions of Oracle Access Manager are single sign-on and its integration capability with different applications."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

"The product supports customization."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"I rate Oracle Access Manager a nine out of ten."

"I find the authentication module, authentication scheme, and security policy most useful in Oracle Access Manager."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."

"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."

"The technical support is not very good at all."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

"Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities."

"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten. The tool's licensing is monthly."

"The tool is affordable."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The product is a little expensive."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Compared 23% of the time

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Compared 20% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Compared 10% of the time

OneLogin vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Compared 9% of the time

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 14% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 Identity Server vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

January 2026

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report

Download i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

January 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Also Known As

AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

No data available

Overview

AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.

i-Sprint Innovations

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

IRAS, Singapore Bank

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

December 2025

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.