IBM Blueworks Live vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

The compared IBM and Interfacing Technologies Corporation solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #12 in BPD , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 3.2% mindshare in the category. Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #143 in BIT , and holds a 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

IBM Blueworks Live

Read 22 IBM Blueworks Live reviews

2,247 Views
1,977 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

817 Views
114 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IBM Blueworks Live

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and IBM Blueworks Live are competing in the enterprise process management solutions category. Interfacing Technologies seems to have an advantage due to its pricing and support edge, while IBM Blueworks Live is recognized for its advanced feature set.

Features: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center includes customizable workflows, integration capabilities, and flexible deployment options. IBM Blueworks Live provides intuitive process mapping, collaboration tools, and a comprehensive feature set that caters to enterprises requiring extensive capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Interfacing Technologies offers flexible deployment options combined with reliable customer service. IBM Blueworks Live features a cloud-based deployment model and responsive support, allowing for greater accessibility and prompt assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is cost-efficient with lower setup costs and a promising ROI. IBM Blueworks Live's higher initial investment is justified by the extensive features it provides, making it a suitable choice for organizations needing its comprehensive capabilities despite a higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Blueworks Live

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (12th)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (143rd), Business Process Management (BPM) (77th), GRC (57th), Quality Management Software (48th), Document Management Software (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Process, Business Automation, and Digital Transformation solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM Blueworks Live is designed for Business Process Design and holds a mindshare of 3.2%, down 3.6% compared to last year.
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center, on the other hand, focuses on BI (Business Intelligence) Tools, holds 0.1% mindshare.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Blueworks Live	3.2%
Visio	10.4%
Bizagi	9.7%
Other	76.7%

Business Process Design

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.1%
Microsoft Power BI	8.9%
Tableau Enterprise	6.2%
Other	84.8%

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Nupur Wadhwa

Consultant 2 at Protiviti

Enables efficient process mapping but requires improvement in maintaining server stability

The pricing of the solution can be quite expensive when compared to competitors, though IBM Blueworks Live stands out from a technical standpoint. IBM Blueworks Live provides clear ROI as it saves both time and money. I have successfully imported Visio flowcharts into both IBM Blueworks Live and ARIS. Both tools handled the imports successfully, though some manual intervention was required because Visio is quite a basic tool. Importing flowcharts into advanced tools such as ARIS and IBM Blueworks Live requires some manual effort. The primary advantage is the ease of use. I have not encountered any features in other tools that I couldn't find in ARIS. This is a major factor because I don't have to switch between tools to find specific features. Using ARIS for the past three years has built confidence and trust in the tool.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The licenses are transferrable between different users."

"Valuable features include real-time modeling and design work, the ability to perform workshops with clients in real-time with the tool, and getting instant output."

"It's very easy, very quick to create a process map. It has templates. The look and feel is very nice. What we want to achieve out of the process map, we can achieve it using Blueworks."

"The stability is pretty good. It is highly available, which is key. You don't lose your work and can autosave."

"The business process discovery is excellent. The diagram or blueprinting functionality of the solution are very good. It's quite easy. You can link the sub-processes and get a big overview of the whole process then."

"This solution is good at utilizing standards rules for connectivity."

"It has a built-in capability to capture process owners and managers against processes along with other process governance roles."

"It is a stable solution since there has not been any downtime. Everything loads fast."

More IBM Blueworks Live pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

Cons

"I wish Blueworks Live had simulations built in, but it doesn't. It also lacks a feature of reporting; ad hoc, drag and drop reporting. A lot of senior people are always asking for reports, and there's no reporting feature within IBM Blueworks."

"In the Blue Works Live software boxes and lines are automatically placed by the programme and can't be easily manipulated."

"Some of the import functionality was a bit restrictive, in terms of loading data in from other data sources. Something as simple as Excel, loading data tables from Excel, wasn't great. And vice-versa. Some of the export and import functionality with something like Visio - which, I know it's a slightly different tool - but being able to work seamlessly with those other tool sets would've been quite useful. I know it was something that was in the pipeline to be looked at. So that would be useful."

"We would like the ability to add additional custom colors. We would like to color additional items to add notes to the blueprint."

"The APIs are great, except the normal business user doesn't know how to create APIs. So it's hard because IBM comes to us as the business users and tell us to create reporting with APIs, except we don't know that, so we have to turn around and flip it to our IT people."

"Spaces are not well organized; space controls are lacking."

"The objects that the solution creates are not unique."

"I can't insert any images. For example, within the process map, if I want to put it in the box or rectangle, or circle. If I have to use one image or icon, that's not possible."

More IBM Blueworks Live cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price wise, IBM Blueworks Live is in the middle range, and I would give it a five out of ten."

"There are editor licenses that are around 50 euros per month, and contributor licenses that are around 30 euros per month."

"The solution is very, very cost-effective."

"They have a free subscription model that gives a lot of power to the users."

"Based on the licenses purchased, from a footprint perspective, you can have as many people as you want. You have multiple different categories of licenses to keep the cost low."

"The solution is not very expensive."

"We are seeing ROI from this solution. The solution has saved us time."

"Making it less expensive would be good."

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Blueworks Live?

The solution is easy to operate. Also, there is an automatic mode to make the business flow. You don't have to put any lines or arrows in a decision point in IBM Blueworks Live; it's very automatic.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Blueworks Live?

I do not have exposure to IBM Blueworks Live pricing since this is managed by other personnel who handle the financial aspects of licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Blueworks Live?

I do not use Security Identity Governance and Intelligence, as it is not implemented here. I would prefer an on-premises solution for IBM Blueworks Live, and this could be a recommendation. Regardi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Visio vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 17% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 10% of the time

Lucidchart vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 9% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Blueworks Live Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 29% of the time

RSA Archer vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 18% of the time

Mitratech Alyne vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 15% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 12% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Blueworks Live

January 2026

Download IBM Blueworks Live product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

February 2026

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

IBM Lombardi Blueprint

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

IBM Blueworks Live is a cloud-based business process modeling tool that helps you discover, map and document your processes. It is easy to use, allowing you to learn and perform business process modeling in minutes.

With Blueworks Live you can:

Simplify business process modeling
Quickly build business processes in a straightforward, cloud-based interface designed for both IT and business users.

Improve process efficiency and accuracy
A central process repository eliminates version control and consistency issues by providing users real-time access to process workflows.

Enhance cross-team collaboration
A shared team workspace engages all business process owners, encouraging cross-team participation and continuous process improvement.

IBM

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

Cloudsoft Corp. Ltd., Bayer, S¾SS, Essex County Council

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Blueworks Live vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.