Top 10 IBM Blueworks Live Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

4.1 out of 5

21 reviews
91% willing to recommend

Top IBM Blueworks Live Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Blueworks Live based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. IBM Blueworks Live surpasses its competitors by offering intuitive cloud-based process modeling, collaborative workspace capabilities, and real-time updates, which streamline business process management and enhance team productivity and efficiency.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

IBM Blueworks Live excels in real-time collaboration and centralized process management, making it suitable for businesses seeking efficient cloud-based solutions. In comparison, Camunda provides flexibility and scalability through its open-source model, appealing to organizations with complex BPMN modeling needs.

Download Camunda vs. IBM Blueworks Live Report

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live offers a straightforward setup at a lower initial cost, while Camunda entails a more involved setup process, reflecting its advanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live offers a straightforward setup at a lower initial cost, while Camunda entails a more involved setup process, reflecting its advanced capabilities.

SAP Signavio Process Manager

4.1 out of 5

SAP Signavio Process Manager

4.1 out of 5

IBM Blueworks Live excels in real-time modeling and simplicity, ideal for those prioritizing ease of use and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SAP Signavio Process Manager offers robust integration with SAP solutions, appealing to users managing complex processes despite its higher pricing.

Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live has an affordable setup cost, while SAP Signavio Process Manager's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live has an affordable setup cost, while SAP Signavio Process Manager's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive features.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

3.9 out of 5

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

3.9 out of 5

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers detailed modeling with extensive standards support, ideal for complex processes. In comparison, IBM Blueworks Live emphasizes simplicity and cloud-based collaboration, appealing to teams needing easy access and integration with Microsoft Office in shared process modeling environments.

Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report

Pricing

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers minimal setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious users, whereas IBM Blueworks Live involves higher setup costs, reflecting a more substantial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers minimal setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious users, whereas IBM Blueworks Live involves higher setup costs, reflecting a more substantial investment.

Bizagi

4.2 out of 5

Bizagi

4.2 out of 5

Bizagi attracts tech buyers with its user-friendly features, flexible pricing, and strong process integration. In comparison, IBM Blueworks Live offers superior collaboration, cloud-based repository, and complex enterprise scalability. Both solutions provide unique benefits catering to varied business process management needs.

Download Bizagi vs. IBM Blueworks Live Report

Pricing

Bizagi offers a more competitive setup cost compared to IBM Blueworks Live, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Bizagi offers a more competitive setup cost compared to IBM Blueworks Live, which requires a higher initial investment.

Visio

3.9 out of 5

Visio

3.9 out of 5

IBM Blueworks Live excels in process automation with superior design and collaboration tools. In comparison, Visio provides extensive diagram customization and integration for creating complex diagrams. Blueworks Live offers cost-effective licensing, while Visio’s extensive stencil library supports diverse deployment environments with flexibility.

Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. Visio Report

Pricing

Visio has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas IBM Blueworks Live involves higher initial expenses but offers robust features.

View comparison

Pricing

Visio has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas IBM Blueworks Live involves higher initial expenses but offers robust features.

ARIS BPA

4.1 out of 5

ARIS BPA

4.1 out of 5

ARIS BPA excels in detailed process modeling for enterprises with complex architecture needs. In comparison, IBM Blueworks Live offers ease of use for process documentation and collaboration. Tech buyers might choose ARIS for its feature richness and IBM Blueworks Live for its simplicity.

Download ARIS BPA vs. IBM Blueworks Live Report

Pricing

ARIS BPA requires a substantial initial investment, while IBM Blueworks Live offers a more affordable setup cost. Choose based on budget constraints and the setup flexibility needed for your organization.

View comparison

Pricing

MEGA HOPEX

3.9 out of 5

MEGA HOPEX

3.9 out of 5

IBM Blueworks Live offers ease of use and collaboration with intuitive process mapping and centralized documentation. In comparison, MEGA HOPEX provides comprehensive features like IT portfolio management and BPMN support, appealing to enterprises needing robust architecture integration and detailed system design documents.

Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. MEGA HOPEX Report

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live has a lower setup cost compared to MEGA HOPEX, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions. MEGA HOPEX, while potentially offering more features, comes with a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

ARIS Cloud

4.0 out of 5

ARIS Cloud

4.0 out of 5

IBM Blueworks Live offers seamless integration with IBM products, ideal for organizations seeking easy-to-use process modeling. In comparison, ARIS Cloud provides strong collaboration and device flexibility for robust process mapping. A tech buyer may choose IBM for integration or ARIS for flexibility.

Download ARIS Cloud vs. IBM Blueworks Live Report

Pricing

IBM Blueworks Live features a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while ARIS Cloud may involve more extensive setup expenses. This distinction is crucial for organizations evaluating the initial financial commitment required for each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

4.2 out of 5

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

4.2 out of 5

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is favored for its detailed process modeling and integration, appealing to organizations focusing on in-depth analysis. In comparison, IBM Blueworks Live excels in collaborative functionalities and quick deployment, suiting businesses that prioritize fast implementation and team collaboration.

Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report

Pricing

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform features a lower setup cost compared to IBM Blueworks Live, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial implementation. Conversely, IBM Blueworks Live may involve higher initial expenses.

Pricing

4.0 out of 5

4.0 out of 5

Related categories

Business Process Design

Business Process Management (BPM)

Process Automation