Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

IBM and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #23, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
IBM Security Network IPS
Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews
  • 253 Views
  • 99 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 14 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 960 Views
  • 619 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Security Network IPS and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System are competing products in the network security landscape. IBM is favored for its pricing and support, whereas Trellix stands out with superior features for those ready to invest more.

Features: IBM Security Network IPS provides robust threat detection, focuses on stability, and integrates seamlessly with transaction systems. Its in-line blocking feature offers intelligent malicious traffic detection and prevention. The XGS series supports extensive traffic throughput. Trellix excels with advanced machine learning, real-time threat intelligence, and automated signature updates. It efficiently handles DDoS attacks and offers robust network traffic inspection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Network IPS could enhance its machine learning capabilities, expand threat intelligence integration, and improve user interface customization. The XGS series would benefit from greater compatibility with third-party systems. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System might streamline its setup process, enhance its customer support response time, and offer more competitive pricing for small businesses. It could also benefit from simplifying its advanced feature set for easier adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Network IPS features a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support, making integration with existing systems easier. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System, while offering comprehensive onboarding assistance, involves more complex deployment requiring extended setup time and expertise. Its support ensures thorough guidance but may need improvements in response efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Network IPS offers competitive initial pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers, providing quick ROI with consistent security measures. Its cost-effectiveness contrasts with Trellix, which generally demands a higher initial investment due to advanced features, offering substantial long-term ROI through comprehensive threat protection. Each product caters to different financial strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
23rd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive
Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.
Read full review
Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects from attacks in real-time and provides accurate threat intelligence updates
I rate the ease of setup a seven or eight out of ten. The platform functions very well. We need technical support to make improvements to the platform. The deployment takes eight months. We need two or three system engineers and one electronic engineer specialized in Trellix platforms to deploy the tool. We need only one system engineer to maintain the product.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."
"The feature I found most valuable is the network threat analyzer in the security platform. It also integrates with GTI, or Global Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I just use the basic features."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"The threat intelligence updates are very accurate."
"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."
"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."
"Great monitoring feature."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."
"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The Network Security Managers could be more stable, agile, and work faster. When it comes to instability, there is room for improvement."
"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."
"The solution could improve some aspects of detection."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."
"The tool is competitively priced."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Network Threat Behavior Analysis must be improved. The technical support must be improved. The support team must provide better help with configurations of devices and enabling NTBA.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 28% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 14% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 12% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 9% of the time
KerioControl vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
KerioControl vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
June 2025
IBM Security Network IPS reportDownload IBM Security Network IPS product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
June 2025
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.
IBM

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
June 2025
Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.