Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

IBM and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #24, while Trellix is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 1.2% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
IBM Security Network IPS
Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews
  • 397 Views
  • 337 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 16 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 1,144 Views
  • 1,018 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Security Network IPS and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System are competing products in the network security landscape. IBM is favored for its pricing and support, whereas Trellix stands out with superior features for those ready to invest more.

Features: IBM Security Network IPS provides robust threat detection, focuses on stability, and integrates seamlessly with transaction systems. Its in-line blocking feature offers intelligent malicious traffic detection and prevention. The XGS series supports extensive traffic throughput. Trellix excels with advanced machine learning, real-time threat intelligence, and automated signature updates. It efficiently handles DDoS attacks and offers robust network traffic inspection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Network IPS could enhance its machine learning capabilities, expand threat intelligence integration, and improve user interface customization. The XGS series would benefit from greater compatibility with third-party systems. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System might streamline its setup process, enhance its customer support response time, and offer more competitive pricing for small businesses. It could also benefit from simplifying its advanced feature set for easier adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Network IPS features a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support, making integration with existing systems easier. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System, while offering comprehensive onboarding assistance, involves more complex deployment requiring extended setup time and expertise. Its support ensures thorough guidance but may need improvements in response efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Network IPS offers competitive initial pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers, providing quick ROI with consistent security measures. Its cost-effectiveness contrasts with Trellix, which generally demands a higher initial investment due to advanced features, offering substantial long-term ROI through comprehensive threat protection. Each product caters to different financial strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
24th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System2.7%
IBM Security Network IPS1.2%
Other96.1%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra - PeerSpot reviewer
Jacob_Koithra
Project & Program manager at Shell Grp
User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive
Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.
Read full review
BS
Bhupesh-Sharma
Large account Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited
Has offered reliable threat protection and detailed network insights but could expand features beyond existing capabilities
The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs). They track and collect data from APTs, which allows them to track malicious files entering the environment. The system offers inline prevention and real-time automatic blocking of malicious packets before they reach the network. It integrates with the Trellix ecosystem and provides application visibility and control. The solution provides deep insight into network traffic, applications, and protocols for better information. All packets coming through the application are analyzed and reported. They share intelligence updates regularly to protect from different malicious files and sector-specific threats. It supports both on-premise and cloud environments.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The best feature of the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is the rules that Trellix provides, I think that's the best value from IPS."
"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."
"The threat intelligence updates are very accurate."
"Great monitoring feature."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."
"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."
"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."
"Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching."
"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The solution could improve some aspects of detection."
"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."
"The management component could be simplified."
"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is competitively priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ExtremeCloud IQ vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
ExtremeCloud IQ vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 21% of the time
Vectra AI vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
Vectra AI vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 15% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 15% of the time
Darktrace vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
Darktrace vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 13% of the time
Cloudflare One vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
Cloudflare One vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 13% of the time
More IBM Security Network IPS Competitors
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 17% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 12% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 11% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 11% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 6% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
January 2026
IBM Security Network IPS reportDownload IBM Security Network IPS product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
January 2026
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.
IBM

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
December 2025
Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.