IBM Storage Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] comparison

IBM and Nutanix are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 86% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 3 IBM Storage Protect reviews

4,197 Views
3,525 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2025

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] and IBM Storage Protect are competitive solutions in the enterprise data backup and protection space. IBM Storage Protect seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which many perceive as justifying its cost.

Features: Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers streamlined integration with existing Nutanix infrastructure, enhancing usability. It emphasizes simplicity and efficiency in backup operations and integrates seamlessly with Nutanix setups. IBM Storage Protect offers advanced features such as extensive support for various environments and robust data protection capabilities, making it versatile for complex infrastructures. It also provides comprehensive tools for data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] is known for its straightforward setup within Nutanix environments, with responsive customer service that enhances the deployment experience. IBM Storage Protect, while requiring more complex configurations and strategic planning, has a support team known for excellent guidance through the deployment process, ensuring smooth long-term integration.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers competitive initial setup costs, resulting in attractive ROI through efficient operational integration and cost-effectiveness. IBM Storage Protect, though having higher upfront costs, justifies this with its extensive feature set and robust data management capabilities, offering substantial ROI through enhanced data protection and management efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (14th)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Syed Habib

Head of Infrastructure Security (S.A.V.P) at EXIM Bank Ltd

Manageable and comprehensive and integrates robust backup features for core banking

It's adequate for my core banking, however, I am looking for another solution for all systems. It is not compatible with other operating systems like Windows or Linux, and lacks a consolidated dashboard from Browser Spectrum. This is why I am searching for another solution. The product also lacks any centralized graphical user interface (GUI), such as Jarek Pod, and I am limited to using a console-based text user interface, which my local partner handles completely.

Read full review

Ingvar Ingason

Channel Sales Manager at Arrow Electronics

An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support

I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In general, the solution is quite user-friendly. The GUI is very nice."

"The D2D2T archive of my PACS data improved after I put Spectrum Protect 8.1.4 into production."

"Their GUI has improved quite a bit. It's made the solution a lot simpler and less complex."

"The technical support for Spectrum Protect is very mature. It is very committed to giving a top-notch support experience."

"The most valuable feature for data recovery in IBM Spectrum Protect is its database protection capabilities."

"It has to ability to backup DV2, Oracle, and Informix."

"We work very closely together with IBM using their Support Center, but we have a strong contact in their development teams, and we have dedicated people from IBM working with us."

"The platform has valuable stability."

More IBM Storage Protect pros

"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."

"We find the ease of use valuable."

"I like the autofill-over feature and the simplicity of the solution."

"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."

Cons

"Technical support could be improved."

"They should have a proper technical support team serving the customers and get issues resolved earlier."

"In the next version of the solution, I would like to see cloud support."

"It is not easy to manage like other products in the market. It is okay only if you are command-line driven. Even though the operation center is there, it doesn't provide a single view of everything. You have to, for example, use TSMManager on top of it, which gives you a far better management capability, but it is a third-party product. Its management needs to be improved. There should be an HTML or graphical interface. It is a very difficult product. For example, you have a backup policy where you want a daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly policy standard. It is an old kind of system where you have to keep retention for daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly backups, which is very difficult in IBM Spectrum Protect. In other products, in a matter of five minutes, you can configure such a policy. In TSM, it takes you one, two, or three days because you need to configure a node for each of them. If you have 250 nodes, you have to configure each node for daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly retention. If you have 1,000 nodes, it is going to take you ages just to configure and register the nodes. You need to configure the schedule and the CAD daemons or services, depending on whether it is a Unix or Windows OS. Unfortunately, it is a very long and drawn-out process. You have to stop and start the services for changes to take effect. This is a very difficult part of TSM in IBM Spectrum Protect. To configure a backup policy, I should be able to select the daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly options in one screen and finish it. After that, everything should happen in the background. All the backup products in the market already do that, and they are very simple to manage. This particular part of this solution has really been a major pain area for us, and unfortunately, we could not find a workaround. There is nobody at IBM who can give us a way to configure all this easily through a GUI or even scripts."

"It should have the ability to break down the data that's being backed up. It should have better reporting."

"The features should be a little bit closer together."

"It might be seen as leaning towards the legacy side, missing some features of newer solutions. The main drawbacks would be its complexity and high pricing."

"It can be improved for large file systems with many files. Spectrum Protect can restore large files very well, but if you're restoring millions of little files, it is not as great. At one point, we tried to implement the VMware module with it, and it was awful and terrible. I don't know if that has improved. If it hasn't, this would be one big improvement."

More IBM Storage Protect cons

"It could be cheaper."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."

"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."

"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."

"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Spectrum Protect is not expensive, and it is simple to use."

"The different license models can give good benefits to the end customer."

"The price of IBM Spectrum Protect is expensive. However, there are a few packages and it is unclear because, for the entry suite they have both options, which are the back-end storage capacity and the front-end storage capacity."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is not cost-effective, and ten is cost-effective."

"Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it."

"We chose IBM Spectrum Protect, because they actually have something called MSP pricing, which means managed services provider pricing. The pricing was attractive, and it seems to be a platform that IBM is totally investing on in terms of new functions and new capabilities."

"It can be perceived as expensive since it is designed for enterprise use."

"We pay for a terabyte license to support our backend usage."

More IBM Storage Protect pricing and cost advice

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."

"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool. However, with good contracts with IBM or its partners, the cost might not be so high. New customers can expect very high prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

One point for improvement for IBM Spectrum Protect is security, as IBM has not been investing as much as in the past. There is a need for additional layers of security to fill the gaps, which is wh...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Mine?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Mine?

On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Mine?

The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 14% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 10% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 9% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Dell Avamar vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA) vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Synology DSM vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2025

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2025

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] product report

Also Known As

IBM Spectrum Discover

Nutanix Mine

Overview

IBM Storage Protect offers data protection and management to secure critical business information efficiently. It's designed to be a scalable and flexible solution for data backup, recovery, and archive needs in complex IT environments.

IBM Storage Protect delivers comprehensive data protection by integrating backup, recovery, and archiving functionalities. It supports a range of workloads and infrastructures, from on-premises to cloud environments, facilitating efficient data management. Its platform provides seamless scalability to meet evolving business needs, underpinned by reliable security measures. Organizations leverage its capabilities to ensure business continuity and minimize data loss risks, making it vital in a data-driven world.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Advanced Data Protection: Offers robust encryption and data integrity for secure backup processes.
Scalability: Grows with your data demands, supporting large data volumes without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud platforms, enhancing backup strategies with hybrid options.
Automated Operations: Simplifies management tasks with automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs by optimizing backup processes and data retention strategies.
Data Safety: Ensures data accessibility and integrity during recovery efforts, building trust in data protection strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Boosts productivity through streamlined and automated backup management workflows.
Compliance Readiness: Helps maintain compliance with data protection regulations by providing thorough reporting and audit trails.

Industries like finance and healthcare implement IBM Storage Protect to safeguard sensitive information against threats. In financial services, it's crucial for maintaining client data confidentiality, while healthcare institutions use it to protect patient records, ensuring both accessibility and compliance with regulations.

IBM

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

CEMEX

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.