IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

IBM and Imprivata are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Imprivata users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

Imprivata OneSign

Read 4 Imprivata OneSign reviews

2,475 Views
2,153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Imprivata OneSign

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, One Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Imprivata OneSign

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (12th)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Rohit Yamsani

Senior Consultant at HCLSoftware

Single sign-on saves time by seamlessly managing passwords and improving workflow efficiency

What I appreciate best about Imprivata OneSign are the single sign-on and the Confirm ID features. The single sign-on works seamlessly for all the nurses or the end users out there. You just have to log in to the application once and the single sign-on clicks in and works for everyone. Users don't have to manually remember all their passwords. Imprivata OneSign helps by remembering and storing all passwords. The integration capabilities of Imprivata OneSign offer many possibilities, and there are numerous upgrades Imprivata has been implementing. At this point, they are growing rapidly. There are new tools coming out for reporting and generating real-time analysis. Imprivata E-PAM is a new feature that I've been reading about in articles, which is going to help administrator people and enterprise administrator personnel to view real-time records and views for all end customers. Reporting and looking at logs for the users will be seamlessly efficient. I use the reporting tools available in Imprivata OneSign. The admin console itself has a reporting feature, which gives us a list of pre-built templates of reports where you can see how many users have been added, the user policy, the users who have last logged in in specific amounts of days, and the reporting for the EPCS users. There are numerous reporting options available which help with troubleshooting issues. I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses. As a nurse or doctor, you don't have to spend time remembering passwords or signing into computers. You just need to grab the nearest machine and tap in. You can use the machine anytime if you want. It saves time when dealing with patients. For doctors who might not be tech-savvy, Imprivata OneSign helps them sign in seamlessly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped them to improve and control web and mobile application security."

"Provided more secure computing."

"It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization."

"The SSO, URL-based access control, OAuth 2 and OIDC are the most valuable features."

"The combination of TAM with IDM in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager helped us to realize robust and secure authentication infrastructure in accordance with industry regulations and laws."

"It is one of the best products in the present market in the area of access management."

"Tivoli Access Manger lets you separate security from applications and manage at one place."

"Tivoli Access Manager's proxy product (WebSEAL) is extremely fast."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

"Imprivata supports single sign-on, providing a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using, and the deployment is very quick and not difficult to deploy."

Cons

"Older TAM versions are not compatible for connecting to a DB."

"We have had stability issues lately with the hardware and SAN that the product runs on."

"Yes, because there are so many moving parts it can often be difficult getting it right first time."

"The license model is pretty complex."

"Redundant Policy servers had to be manually configured using LB."

"There is Java process that hangs in WebSphere almost every month."

"The whole product could be made into one suite instead of multiple components which are essentially a part of the same infrastructure."

"It was complex for us as we have multiple domains."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefront connectivity."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

"They should have a landing page."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

14%

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

24%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Imprivata OneSign?

Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefron...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Imprivata OneSign?

I have experience with Imprivata OneSign and Imprivata Confirm ID. For the past three and a half years, I've been using Imprivata OneSign 7.9 and Confirm ID 7.9 versions. The client I'm working wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imprivata OneSign?

As an end user, it's easy to use Imprivata OneSign. Users don't have to rely much on knowledge to use that tool. It's basic, just an agent that sits on your machine and you shouldn't worry about an...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Okta Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

BlueFletch vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 8% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 8% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

June 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

June 2026

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

Imprivata OneSign provides single sign-on, streamlining application access through AI-managed passwords. It supports legacy systems, enhances security, and saves time, especially valuable for healthcare. Confirm ID and reporting tools enable seamless integration and user activity tracking.

Imprivata OneSign is a comprehensive single sign-on and multi-factor authentication platform that simplifies password management and streamlines user access to over fifty applications. Designed primarily for healthcare, it integrates with both cloud and on-premises systems, offering upgraded versions like G4 23.7 with advanced security features such as MFA and Vasco tokens. Although its price point is higher and Mac OS compatibility is limited, it improves focus on patient care by reducing administrative burdens. Challenges include fast user switching, Citrix integration lag, and authentication slowness with published applications.

What are Imprivata OneSign's key features?

Single Sign-On: Access multiple applications with one ID, enhancing security and efficiency.
AI-Managed Passwords: Automates password entry, reducing manual input and errors.
Legacy System Integration: Enhances security and eases transitions with existing systems.
Confirm ID: Ensures seamless and secure end-user authentication.
E-PAM & Reporting Tools: Tracks user activity to optimize system use.

What benefits should users look for in OneSign reviews?

Enhanced Security: Combines single sign-on with MFA and Vasco tokens for improved data protection.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on administrative tasks, focusing resource allocation on patient care.
Scalability: Supports cloud and on-premises deployments, accommodating growing IT infrastructures.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT systems while offering advanced security features.

Imprivata OneSign is especially impactful in healthcare settings, where quick access to applications without sacrificing security is crucial. It facilitates e-prescribing and other clinical tasks through streamlined processes and advanced authentication measures, ensuring that patient care remains the primary focus.

Imprivata

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, One Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.