Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 9.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Microsoft’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

20,873 Views
8,767 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,424 Views
1,410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management are prominent players in privileged access solutions, focusing on securing user access to sensitive resources. Microsoft Purview appears to have an advantage with its extensive features, appealing to businesses valuing advanced capabilities.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager includes potent identity management, tailored access controls, and efficient audit capabilities. Microsoft Purview offers integrated AI analytics, advanced security monitoring, and comprehensive compliance tools. It stands out for its depth in analytics and compliance functionalities, offering a broad range of technical tools.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its feature set to match the expansive capabilities of competitors. Its analytics and compliance features are less comprehensive than those of other platforms. Additionally, Idira may benefit from increasing its offerings in AI integration. Microsoft Purview could improve its cost structure, as the initial investment is high. Simplification of its deployment process might attract smaller enterprises, and expanding support options could further enhance user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira provides a streamlined deployment approach with an effective support system, ensuring smooth integration. Microsoft Purview benefits from a scalable cloud-based setup, greatly supported by Microsoft's extensive ecosystem. While Idira offers direct deployment and attentive customer service, Microsoft's network provides robust infrastructure support.

Pricing and ROI: Idira offers a competitive entry cost, appealing for businesses seeking rapid return on investment through effective access management. Microsoft Purview demands a higher initial cost but justifies it with long-term ROI through its advanced features and strategic insights into privileged access management. The main contrast lies in Idira's affordable pricing against Microsoft Purview's comprehensive capabilities, backed by substantial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (3rd), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Idira Privileged Access Manager is 9.8%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.7%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager	9.8%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.7%
Other	88.5%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Atul-Gujar

CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

Read full review

Christiaan Evenhuis

Technical Consultant Security and Compliance at inSpark

Integration helps protect sensitive information effectively and new GUI simplifies setup

Regarding improvements for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, there are still some challenges. Purview contains numerous predefined sensitive information types, which sometimes makes it difficult to specify relevance. For example, in the Netherlands, we are not interested in driver licenses from Australia, making separation challenging. Furthermore, the capabilities for exporting large amounts of sensitive information for deeper investigations and reporting should be enhanced. Additional features related to AI tools would be beneficial in the next release. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling. While they have made a good start, AI is advancing faster than anticipated, creating a gap that needs to be addressed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We primarily use this product for privileged identity management, restricting privileged IDs, and governance."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to delegate access to admins when they need it, allowing us to have some kind of proof on the approval process, rather than give people standing access on a full-time basis."

"The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application."

"It does what it promised, it secures our platforms, has the scalability, and it is just a solid product."

"CPM helps keep the password policy up to date."

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's abilities to safeguard the infrastructure are important, as protecting credentials provides us with security and visibility."

"Their legacy of more than 20 years is very valuable; it brings a lot of stability to the product and a wide variety of integration with the ecosystem, and because of these factors it has been very successful in deployment, making the PAM platform very stable and strong."

"The automatic change of the password and Privileged Session Manager (PSM) are the most valuable features. With Privileged Session Manager, you can control the password management in a centralized way. You can activate these features in a session; the session isolation and recording. You apply the full intermediation principle. So, you must pass through CyberArk PAM to get access to the target system. You don't need to know the password, and everything that you do is registered and auditable. In this case, no one gets to touch the password directly. Also, you can implement detection and response behavior in case of a breach."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

Cons

"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."

"Having a cloud version would be very helpful. You have to invest a lot of money for the infrastructure hardware so the cloud version would help."

"The solution could improve by adding more connectors."

"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."

"If we actually implement agent AI in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it will check the logs, and if any errors are coming, it automatically triggers alerts and gives the solution."

"Earlier in 9.0 version I faced some stability issues, yes there are some stability issues with CyberArk such as memory leakage, password unsync etc. These are some common problems but frustrating."

"The performance of this product needs to be improved. When the number of privileged accounts increases, i.e., exceeds 2000, then the performance of the system reduces."

"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company always complains about the cost of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager because it's too high."

"It's an affordable platform."

"It is in line with its competitors, but all such solutions cost too much money."

"The pricing is slightly higher compared to other solutions, but it is reasonable because there are better security features."

"It costs us around $200 per user."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"I have heard from my leaders that CyberArk is costlier in terms of licensing. The support and maintenance are also costly. We use their premium support, but for the price we pay, we do not get the value."

"I focus more on the technical side, but I hear customers say that if CyberArk was more affordable, they might have acquired more licenses. Some clients consider alternative solutions due to pricing concerns."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	174

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

Comparisons

One Identity Safeguard vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 22% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 8% of the time

BeyondTrust Password Safe vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

May 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

May 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Overview

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers seamless integration with Microsoft solutions, providing enhanced security with just-in-time access and automated revocation. It supports Azure Identity for automated and conditional access features, streamlining data management across platforms.

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is known for its detailed auditing, customizable reports, and robust security features. While it efficiently manages privileged access and controls roles in platforms like Azure and Office 365, improvement is needed in predefined sensitive information types and large data exports. Users value its capabilities in preventing data leaks and managing access in applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. However, challenges remain with AI features and regional relevance of sensitivity types. Documentation could be clearer, and support services improved. Despite these issues, the pricing is transparent, providing a clear view into costs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Detailed Auditing: Provides thorough logging of access activities.
Just-in-Time Access: Grants temporary elevated access with automatic revocation.
Alerting: Notifies users of changes in access rights.
Integration with Azure Identity: Enables automation and conditional access protocols.
Customizable Reports: Offers tailored analytical reports for better insights.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Just-in-time access reduces risks of unauthorized use.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing Microsoft ecosystems.
Efficient Data Management: Supports the management of sensitive formats, like credit card data.
Pricing Transparency: Clear and straightforward cost structure.

Companies across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors implement Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to protect sensitive data and maintain control over access roles. Used alongside data protection measures like Data Loss Prevention, it helps organizations reduce the risk of data leaks while complementing other security technologies. Adoption has been broad across industries needing stringent data governance.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

April 2026

Free Report: Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.