Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 9.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to Microsoft’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

22,329 Views
9,378 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,467 Views
1,452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management are prominent players in privileged access solutions, focusing on securing user access to sensitive resources. Microsoft Purview appears to have an advantage with its extensive features, appealing to businesses valuing advanced capabilities.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager includes potent identity management, tailored access controls, and efficient audit capabilities. Microsoft Purview offers integrated AI analytics, advanced security monitoring, and comprehensive compliance tools. It stands out for its depth in analytics and compliance functionalities, offering a broad range of technical tools.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its feature set to match the expansive capabilities of competitors. Its analytics and compliance features are less comprehensive than those of other platforms. Additionally, Idira may benefit from increasing its offerings in AI integration. Microsoft Purview could improve its cost structure, as the initial investment is high. Simplification of its deployment process might attract smaller enterprises, and expanding support options could further enhance user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira provides a streamlined deployment approach with an effective support system, ensuring smooth integration. Microsoft Purview benefits from a scalable cloud-based setup, greatly supported by Microsoft's extensive ecosystem. While Idira offers direct deployment and attentive customer service, Microsoft's network provides robust infrastructure support.

Pricing and ROI: Idira offers a competitive entry cost, appealing for businesses seeking rapid return on investment through effective access management. Microsoft Purview demands a higher initial cost but justifies it with long-term ROI through its advanced features and strategic insights into privileged access management. The main contrast lies in Idira's affordable pricing against Microsoft Purview's comprehensive capabilities, backed by substantial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Idira Privileged Access Manager is 9.9%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira Privileged Access Manager	9.9%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.7%
Other	88.4%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Atul-Gujar

CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

Read full review

reviewer2797275

Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees

Access control has improved approvals and tracking and now supports just-in-time administration

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval. This means someone doing something has to put in what ticket information is relevant so I can keep track of why they are doing it. They are not just going in there with access to do whatever they want to do. It has to be done with a purpose and I think that is a big key point of it. The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access. I think it is just a matter of how things are set up. If I need to build a server, I have to go in and increase my privileges for an amount of time that is allowed to build the server and then it elapses and then I am kicked out and then the next time I have to do it all over again. This is nice because it keeps track of what is going on. However, it would be nicer if I got a better reporting tool that can show what was happening instead of an email every single time it happens. The access review capabilities of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely benefits me so that I have a better understanding of who has access to what and what they are doing at what time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has allowed us to improve both the management and access to privileged credentials, while also creating a full audit trail of all activities happening within isolated sessions of all tasks and activities taking place within the solution."

"It has a lot of good tools, including everything we need."

"Because we now have the ability to grant access to management utilities like DNS Manager, Sequel Studio, and MMC, in a secure fashion, without system admins being required to continually reenter various passwords that are stored who knows where, it has really made the system admin's job much easier. It has made the PSM's job much easier. It has made the auditor's job and the security team's job and the access manager's job significantly easier, because we're able to move much more quickly toward a role-based access management system, and that is really streamlining the whole onboarding/offboarding management process."

"It has improved our organization by being able to consolidate several privileged access technologies into a unified tool, while session recording, auditing capability, and approval workflows allow a high degree of control over the organisation’s privileged access requirements for compliance purposes."

"Regardless it's a good solution, it works, and the bank is happy with it."

"I find the threat analytics is an important feature, as CyberArk can look at the log details and analyze who is using the applications, which are their locations, and which are the IP locations from which they are accessing, enabling the solution to find the exact location the threat is emanating from, which we really value."

"I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature."

"We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

Cons

"One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening."

"The native PSM components are really good, however, if you have to apply environmental tweaks to an application launch, custom AutoIt scripts are needed."

"There was a situation when one of our presidents had an issue, but I can't recall the specifics."

"We require IAM (identify and access management) capability at the administrator level because we need more identification."

"The solution is too complicated to use and should be simplified. It took me a long time to understand how to use it. There is a lot that the solution can improve for the future."

"Stability is a huge concern right now. We are on a version which is very unstable. We have to upgrade to stabilize it. It is fine, but the problem is we have to hire CyberArk to do the upgrade. This costs money, and it is their bug."

"Enhanced PSM support for Java based applications."

"More than the product itself, there is room for improvement in the documentation. The documentation should be very detailed and very structured. It has a lot of good information, on one level, but I feel that it could be more elaborate and more structured."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's pricing is reasonable."

"With the current model of licensing, for my use cases, sometimes it's hard to convince the management and get budget approvals for it. It's expensive and you're not getting anything new. It's just a control, but in terms of risk, you are covering a big impact on the company. Improvement in the licensing prices is something I would want to have."

"The product's licensing is yearly. I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"CyberArk DNA is free if you purchase the CyberArk solution. There is no additional charge for CyberArk DNA, which is great."

"Generally, I don't get involved in the licensing or the purchasing side of it, but I do know that the licenses are expensive."

"The SaaS version of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is very expensive, but the on-premises version is relative, e.g. depending on the size of the environment, it can be a bit pricey, but it's relatively okay compared to the others."

"From a client perspective, CyberArk's pricing is fair but there is a significant increase each year. They should limit the price increase because this could potentially drive customers to other partners. Price changes should be at defined intervals. There should not be sudden jumps."

"The main problem for the tool is its licensing. I work for a really big company. When you try to develop this as a service, usually you work with leverage teams who are formed with dozens of members. You might dedicate one FTE, or less, for something, e.g., an antivirus administrator. You might have half an FTE's effort dedicated to administering the antivirus, but then you have a team of about 30 users who might access that ticket. The problem is that CyberArk eliminated the possibility of concurrent users years ago. This is a big problem for companies who work with leverage teams. You need to pay for everyone. 40 licenses are used by 20 or 30 people. This is a big problem because licenses are not precisely cheap."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	175

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

Comparisons

Safeguard by One Identity vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 20% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

Cloud PAM Essentials by One Identity vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

July 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

July 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Overview

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers seamless integration with Microsoft solutions, providing enhanced security with just-in-time access and automated revocation. It supports Azure Identity for automated and conditional access features, streamlining data management across platforms.

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is known for its detailed auditing, customizable reports, and robust security features. While it efficiently manages privileged access and controls roles in platforms like Azure and Office 365, improvement is needed in predefined sensitive information types and large data exports. Users value its capabilities in preventing data leaks and managing access in applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. However, challenges remain with AI features and regional relevance of sensitivity types. Documentation could be clearer, and support services improved. Despite these issues, the pricing is transparent, providing a clear view into costs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Detailed Auditing: Provides thorough logging of access activities.
Just-in-Time Access: Grants temporary elevated access with automatic revocation.
Alerting: Notifies users of changes in access rights.
Integration with Azure Identity: Enables automation and conditional access protocols.
Customizable Reports: Offers tailored analytical reports for better insights.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Just-in-time access reduces risks of unauthorized use.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing Microsoft ecosystems.
Efficient Data Management: Supports the management of sensitive formats, like credit card data.
Pricing Transparency: Clear and straightforward cost structure.

Companies across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors implement Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to protect sensitive data and maintain control over access roles. Used alongside data protection measures like Data Loss Prevention, it helps organizations reduce the risk of data leaks while complementing other security technologies. Adoption has been broad across industries needing stringent data governance.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

June 2026

Free Report: Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.