Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs Okta Platform comparison

Microsoft and Okta are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Okta is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7. Microsoft holds a 1.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Okta’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Okta users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,038 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Read 93 Okta Platform reviews

10,099 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Okta Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Okta Platform and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management compete in the identity and access management space. Okta Platform tends to have the upper hand in user authentication and integration, while Microsoft Purview offers a detailed feature set and security.

Features: Okta Platform provides seamless integration with a wide range of applications, a high degree of customization in identity solutions, and effective user provisioning capabilities. Microsoft Purview offers robust data protection across cloud environments, granular access controls, and comprehensive auditing tools.

Room for Improvement: Okta Platform could enhance its granular reporting capabilities, expand feature sets for in-depth security measures, and improve detailed compliance features. Microsoft Purview can improve its integration capability with non-Microsoft ecosystems, simplify certain aspects of its user interface, and enhance flexibility in customization for diverse IT environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview integrates smoothly with existing Microsoft services, simplifying deployment for Microsoft-centric organizations but may pose challenges outside this ecosystem. Okta Platform is known for easy setup and excellent customer support, making it ideal for diverse IT environments beyond Microsoft solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Okta Platform is recognized for competitive initial costs and rapid ROI, providing a suitable identity solution for cost-conscious businesses. Microsoft Purview, while potentially more expensive initially, offers extensive features that justify the cost, particularly for those leveraging a full suite of Microsoft services.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Okta Platform

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (5th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Platform is 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Okta Platform	3.1%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.8%
Other	95.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Christiaan Evenhuis

Technical Consultant Security and Compliance at inSpark

Integration helps protect sensitive information effectively and new GUI simplifies setup

Regarding improvements for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, there are still some challenges. Purview contains numerous predefined sensitive information types, which sometimes makes it difficult to specify relevance. For example, in the Netherlands, we are not interested in driver licenses from Australia, making separation challenging. Furthermore, the capabilities for exporting large amounts of sensitive information for deeper investigations and reporting should be enhanced. Additional features related to AI tools would be beneficial in the next release. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling. While they have made a good start, AI is advancing faster than anticipated, creating a gap that needs to be addressed.

Read full review

SumitMundik

Lead Admin Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Authentication process improves security with quick and intuitive user interface

The best feature is the speed and execution of Okta Workforce Identity. The moment you click on single sign-on, you immediately get the notification on your mobile phone, then you do the authentication and within a second you get authenticated. The entire customer experience is very good. The user interface is pretty simple, straightforward, and really good. Multi-factor authentication in Okta Workforce Identity is very useful so people who do not have access or are trying to access using just a user ID and password will be completely blocked because of this two-factor authentication. You will get the code, and as your device is authorized in the system, only that device can be used for the authentication purpose. A third person trying to access or hack your data will not be able to do that anymore. Additionally, you don't have to remember your passwords going forward. Previously, every 60 days or 90 days, passwords kept changing. With the two-factor authentication or single sign-on option in Okta Workforce Identity, you don't have to remember it anymore or write down passwords in plain text. If something goes wrong, we have the IAM team which can unlock your account immediately if you have issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."

"As far as our security team is concerned, the ease of implementing multifactor authentication is definitely the biggest value for our organization."

"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."

"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."

"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."

"The main benefits Okta Customer Identity provides to users include single point of login for all applications and single authentication, which saves time and reduces frustration."

"The most useful features of Okta for my organization are identity and access management, single sign-on, and the flexibility for hybrid setups."

"Okta Customer Identity is considered cheaper compared to other tools in the market, such as IBM and CyberArk products."

More Okta Platform pros

Cons

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"There is no proper documentation on integrating test cases with Okta, and this issue is troubling whenever I try to implement it."

"When you are doing basic things, it is straightforward, but if you are going to be doing workflows, other things, or recon and trust, then there is effort involved, and that is where it gets convoluted."

"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."

"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."

"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."

"Okta Platform can be improved by enhancing the mobile application because sometimes it has issues."

"We've not had any problems with Okta."

"Okta Platform could be improved by offering more out-of-the-box templates for advanced workflows and making the administration console faster when searching through a very large group of users."

More Okta Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing model is fine for general service usage. However, the charges for API features and API tokens can be quite high."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution but the security makes it worthwhile."

"The product has a user-based license model."

"License is around US$20,000 annually."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Okta's pricing is right where it needs to be and right in the middle of the market."

"The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 27% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 13% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 12% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Saviynt vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

January 2026

Download Okta Platform product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

Overview

Privileged access management allows granular access control over privileged admin tasks in Office 365. It can help protect your organization from breaches that use existing privileged admin accounts with standing access to sensitive data or access to critical configuration settings. Privileged access management requires users to request just-in-time access to complete elevated and privileged tasks through a highly scoped and time-bounded approval workflow. This configuration gives users just-enough-access to perform the task at hand, without risking exposure of sensitive data or critical configuration settings. Enabling privileged access management in Microsoft 365 allows your organization to operate with zero standing privileges and provide a layer of defense against standing administrative access vulnerabilities.

Microsoft

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform

February 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Okta Platform report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.