No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infinite Blue vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infinite Blue
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (40th), Low-Code Development Platforms (35th)
Oracle Java Cloud Service
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Infinite Blue and Oracle Java Cloud Service aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Infinite Blue is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Oracle Java Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 1.3% mindshare, up 0.6% since last year.
Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infinite Blue0.8%
Microsoft Power Apps7.6%
Oracle Application Express (APEX)5.1%
Other86.5%
Rapid Application Development Software
PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Java Cloud Service1.3%
Amazon AWS13.3%
Microsoft Azure11.3%
Other74.1%
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Logisthead67 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Logistics and Operations at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
A simple solution with an easy setup and good stability
The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelilng The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy. The user interface should add some more functionality in the next…
Adam Elguennioui - PeerSpot reviewer
SAP Consultant at SA&BC
Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users
The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is simple; it's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out, and it's very fast to develop the screens and the modeling."
"The product is very good, fine-tuned, and stable, and support is available 24/7 and is really fast and effective."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"Moving to Oracle Cloud has addressed some of our major concerns with having to manage the infrastructure, which needs better scalability, integrated security, and better database access."
"The Oracle Java Cloud Service has enabled our developers to focus on what they do best: developing modern Java applications."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."
"Demoing is always an expensive process, from procurement of hardware to installation of software, now it is easier, cheaper, and more elastic."
 

Cons

"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."
"It needs to have the ability to create a service with the same name as another one when the initial creation failed as sometimes it's necessary to have a service with exact name."
"I would like to see more monitors for standard edition"
"I think there should be improvement with the speed and it should offer a more diverse selection of the suites that I can use."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"So far, the only issue I have is with the storage cloud."
"It has been built on Java technology but requires more integration with other APIs and CI tools."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."
"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."
"It is somewhat expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
 

Also Known As

Progress Rollbase, Rollbase
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pironet NDH, Jungle Lasers, Aintercarga SAS, ASPsoftware, Cloudselling
Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Unqork and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.