Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Ivanti and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Ivanti is ranked #57, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Ivanti holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Read 1 Ivanti Neurons for RBVM review

596 Views
524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Read 45 Tenable Vulnerability Management reviews

7,052 Views
6,135 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

57th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 3.2%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	3.2%
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM	0.5%
Other	96.3%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Anon127

Security Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations

We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations. The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my organization Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user…

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

"The interface is fine."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"The ease of use, the automated scanning facility, and their good support mechanism are all valuable."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."

"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."

"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."

"Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"I'd like to see them improve their support."

"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."

"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."

"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."

"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"The solution is not too expensive."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think that there is any very specific area where enhancements need to happen in Tenable Vulnerability Management's feature sets. The only area which possibly is not a part of the feature, b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys VMDR vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Compared 15% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Compared 12% of the time

Brinqa vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Compared 9% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

January 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons for RBVM product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

January 2026

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

RiskSense

Tenable.io

Overview

Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.

Ivanti

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.