Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Ivanti and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while Qualys is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Ivanti holds a 2.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Qualys’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Security Controls

Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls reviews

795 Views
795 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Read 40 Qualys Patch Management reviews

1,765 Views
1,765 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ivanti Security Controls

Qualys Patch Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Security Controls and Qualys Patch Management are leading solutions in IT security and patch management. Qualys stands out in feature robustness and perceived value, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.

Features: Ivanti Security Controls offers powerful patching capabilities, comprehensive management tools, and positive support experiences. Qualys Patch Management provides extensive vulnerability scanning, integration with broader security tools, and robust functionality.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti needs better reporting tools, easier patch deployment processes, and significant updates to match user expectations. Qualys users suggest enhancements in user experience, advanced configuration options, and minor usability improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti is praised for smooth deployment and responsive support with minimal setup issues. Qualys has a slightly complex deployment phase but offers exceptional customer service to overcome challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti is favored for affordable setup costs and quick ROI, suitable for budget-conscious buyers. Qualys, though initially more expensive, offers greater long-term value through extensive features and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Security Controls

Ranking in Patch Management

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Security Controls is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 3.6%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qualys Patch Management	3.6%
Ivanti Security Controls	2.5%
Other	93.9%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Chethan R

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility

This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Patch management process becomes more efficient and cost-effective while significantly improving vulnerability remediation rates

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features. It was challenging to identify the options we could employ and why we were using them. However, once I gained hands-on experience, I was able to identify the tool's particular features, making it easier for us to use it. The initial phase had some difficulty with the user interface. I would them to improve user training. They have used many colors, which can be confusing, so they should use specific colors for specific options. For critical options, they could make them red, green for medium, and blue for less significant options. This would make it easier for a beginner to recognize which buttons are dangerous to click. Such adjustments can help new users learn the solution faster.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."

"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."

"Technical support is helpful and responsive."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."

"Patch Management supports various software lists when compared to Microsoft Intune. It is especially beneficial for non-Microsoft applications. I can create a schedule, and various patches can be automatically deployed."

"Patch management significantly helped us track and reduce vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of Qualys Patch Management include its ability to automate patch deployment for hundreds or thousands of assets, reducing our reliance on the IT team to perform these tasks manually."

"Qualys Patch Management leverages vulnerability feeds from the VMDR module, allowing us to identify vulnerabilities missing Qualys patches."

"Qualys Patch Management offers numerous valuable features, including automatic patching for Google browsers, which allows for scheduled updates immediately upon vendor release."

"I think the TruRisk system and the TruRisk automation are great."

"Qualys Patch Management excels with its automated patch scheduling and retrieval."

"The features I find most valuable in Qualys Patch Management include the ability to manage registry changes and run scripts both pre and post-patching. We have been able to apply workarounds for zero-day vulnerabilities efficiently."

More Qualys Patch Management pros

Cons

"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."

"It should be more scalable."

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."

"Not all patches are supported, so there are some restrictions. Some remediations require script-level changes which Qualys does not support."

"There is room for improvement in the detection logic. It sometimes detects open vulnerabilities that are not truly there, such as orphan files that are not really exploitable. It would be helpful if they were classified as information-only rather than Sev 4 or Sev 5."

"The pricing of the solution is slightly high compared to other tools in our field."

"Qualys's current response time for releasing solutions to zero-day vulnerabilities, which takes approximately 12 to 16 hours, needs improvement."

"False positives were the biggest concern. We also had some concerns with respect to the Cloud Agent."

"False positives were the biggest concern."

"There are certain integration parts that could be improved. Sometimes, legacy operating systems are not supported by Qualys Patch Management, which is an issue."

"Qualys's current response time for releasing solutions to zero-day vulnerabilities, which takes approximately 12 to 16 hours, needs improvement."

More Qualys Patch Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other tools, the price of Qualys Patch Management is reasonable."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."

"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."

"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."

More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?

Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?

We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?

I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

The pricing of Qualys is promising, but I don't have the specifics. Based on my experience, both Qualys and Tenable have similar price points, but clients choose based on whether they need a compre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

Qualys should improve by offering a dedicated testing environment for patches, allowing clients to test patches before deploying them to production. Currently, clients must manage this themselves, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

I have experience using Qualys because I'm a pre-sales engineer in one of the systems integrator companies here in the Philippines. I am also handling and selling Qualys, doing presentations to our...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 14% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 9% of the time

More Ivanti Security Controls Competitors

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

January 2026

Download Ivanti Security Controls product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

January 2026

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Overview

Ivanti Security Controls simplifies security with unified and automated prevention, detection, and response techniques that target your biggest attack vectors. It provides the security global experts agree creates the highest barriers to modern cyber attacks, including discovery, OS and application patch management, privilege management, and whitelisting.

Ivanti

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

December 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.