Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Ivanti and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while Qualys is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Ivanti holds a 2.3% mindshare in PM, compared to Qualys’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Security Controls

Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls reviews

1,266 Views
1,266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Read 51 Qualys Patch Management reviews

3,317 Views
3,317 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Ivanti Security Controls

Qualys Patch Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Security Controls and Qualys Patch Management are leading solutions in IT security and patch management. Qualys stands out in feature robustness and perceived value, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.

Features: Ivanti Security Controls offers powerful patching capabilities, comprehensive management tools, and positive support experiences. Qualys Patch Management provides extensive vulnerability scanning, integration with broader security tools, and robust functionality.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti needs better reporting tools, easier patch deployment processes, and significant updates to match user expectations. Qualys users suggest enhancements in user experience, advanced configuration options, and minor usability improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti is praised for smooth deployment and responsive support with minimal setup issues. Qualys has a slightly complex deployment phase but offers exceptional customer service to overcome challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti is favored for affordable setup costs and quick ROI, suitable for budget-conscious buyers. Qualys, though initially more expensive, offers greater long-term value through extensive features and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Security Controls

Ranking in Patch Management

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Security Controls is 2.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 3.0%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management	3.0%
Ivanti Security Controls	2.3%
Other	94.7%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Chethan R

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility

This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2706300

Cyber Security Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Patch management process becomes more efficient and cost-effective while significantly improving vulnerability remediation rates

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features. It was challenging to identify the options we could employ and why we were using them. However, once I gained hands-on experience, I was able to identify the tool's particular features, making it easier for us to use it. The initial phase had some difficulty with the user interface. I would them to improve user training. They have used many colors, which can be confusing, so they should use specific colors for specific options. For critical options, they could make them red, green for medium, and blue for less significant options. This would make it easier for a beginner to recognize which buttons are dangerous to click. Such adjustments can help new users learn the solution faster.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is helpful and responsive."

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."

"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."

"Automated features streamline patch deployment and ensure compliance, effectively mitigating risks and bolstering organizational security."

"Since implementing Qualys Patch Management, we have seen measurable improvements in remediation speed, reducing our patch turnaround time significantly from four weeks with a compliance of about 60% to about 24 to 48 hours for critical vulnerabilities with an average vulnerability count per device down to around 10."

"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."

"Qualys Patch Management excels with its automated patch scheduling and retrieval."

"I think the TruRisk system and the TruRisk automation are great."

"My overall rating for Qualys Patch Management is a ten out of ten."

"Patch Management offers pre-action and post-action features, which provide the ability to execute scripts during the installation or uninstallation of software. This helps me make changes from Qualys itself."

"Customer service is exceptional."

More Qualys Patch Management pros

Cons

"It should be more scalable."

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."

"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."

"Qualys Patch Management can be improved by enhancing the reporting capabilities and dashboards since it is difficult to extract customized executive reports for the board."

"Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features. It was challenging to identify the options we could employ and why we were using them."

"Not all patches are supported, so there are some restrictions. Some remediations require script-level changes which Qualys does not support."

"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch."

"Downloading extensive vulnerability reports, especially those with millions of entries, is time-consuming. To improve efficiency, Qualys should implement faster download speeds and offer reports in Excel format in addition to the current CSV option."

"The turnaround for support is a bit slow, especially when trying to deploy patches that are not accepted by certain devices, leading to delays in addressing urgent customer issues."

"Qualys can do regular check-ins to go over not only all the vulnerabilities but also the overall process to see if there is anything where we might need improvement."

"I want them to work on improving third-party patching support and the performance in large environments, as patch deployment is slow in large environments."

More Qualys Patch Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."

"Compared to other tools, the price of Qualys Patch Management is reasonable."

"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."

"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."

"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."

More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?

Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?

We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?

I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

The setup cost for Qualys Patch Management was manageable since it was handled in-house, and while the pricing could be a bit cheaper, it remains reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

While Qualys Patch Management is a powerful tool, there are areas for improvement, such as enhancing patch-to-asset accuracy, improving deployment feedback and error visibility, optimizing bandwidt...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

My name is Gift Denison Djemeda, and I stay in Botswana, a country in Southern Africa, where my full title is a Vulnerability Management Specialist, focusing on vulnerability management and infrast...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 14% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 11% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 8% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Security Controls Competitors

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 11% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 10% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

May 2026

Download Ivanti Security Controls product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

April 2026

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Overview

Ivanti Security Controls delivers a reliable, stable setup for managing and installing upgrades and applications, featuring agentless operation and comprehensive reporting. It's preferred by data centers for efficiently addressing vulnerabilities through agentless solutions and backend scripting.

Ivanti Security Controls is instrumental in deploying updates to servers and workstations, effectively managing Microsoft and non-Microsoft patches. Teams leverage its centralized console for efficiency, conducting vulnerability scans and deploying patches based on detected issues. Users appreciate its responsive support and backend scripting capabilities, finding it essential for streamlining patching tasks and addressing vulnerabilities. Areas for improvement include cloud capabilities, logging, and scalability, with users seeking more intuitive report designs, enhanced documentation, and improved application management. Error messages during Windows upgrades need clarity, and more visibility in asset management is desired.

What are the most important features of Ivanti Security Controls?

Agentless Operation: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing operational efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers in-depth insights into security status and system vulnerabilities.
Patch and Asset Management: Simplifies the management of software updates and inventory tracking.
Credential Management: Ensures secure handling of sensitive access information.
PowerShell Script Execution: Allows automated tasks and customized scripting for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in Ivanti Security Controls?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines update processes, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Security: Improves system safety by addressing vulnerabilities quickly.
Responsive Support: Assists quickly in troubleshooting and resolving user issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing updates and patches across systems.
Visibility into Vulnerabilities: Provides insights to tackle potential security threats effectively.

Ivanti Security Controls sees extensive use in industries requiring robust patch management and vulnerability scanning, notably in data centers where maintaining security and efficiency is critical. Its ability to deploy updates seamlessly makes it a valuable tool for sectors focused on IT infrastructure management.

Ivanti

Qualys Patch Management offers asset visibility, risk-based prioritization, and automation to enhance security. It integrates with VMDR for vulnerability prioritization, ensuring efficient patch deployment and reduced manual effort.

Qualys Patch Management focuses on automating patch deployment and bridging the gap between vulnerability identification and resolution. It supports Windows and Linux servers, providing real-time assessments and comprehensive reporting. The integration with VMDR prioritizes risks efficiently, promoting collaboration between IT and security teams. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows, improved vulnerability response times, and enhanced remote management.

What are the key features of Qualys Patch Management?

Asset Visibility: Provides precise tracking of all assets across environments.
Risk-Based Prioritization: Enables prioritization based on vulnerability risk level.
Automation: Streamlines patch deployment to reduce manual workload.
VMDR Integration: Integrates with VMDR for efficient vulnerability management.
Real-Time Assessments: Offers immediate analysis and feedback on patches.

What benefits can organizations expect from Qualys Patch Management?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces vulnerabilities across systems.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines workflows for faster resolutions.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes manual efforts, reducing associated costs.
Cross-Department Collaboration: Enhances communication between IT and security.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Qualys Patch Management is pivotal for maintaining stringent security standards. It helps organizations quickly address vulnerabilities, crucial in sectors that handle sensitive data. The ability to integrate with existing systems ensures minimal disruption and maximizes resource efficiency.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

April 2026

Free Report: Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Security Controls vs. Qualys Patch Management report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.