Jama Connect vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Jama and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Jama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Jama holds a 3.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jama Connect

Read 17 Jama Connect reviews

5,919 Views
3,433 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

22,317 Views
13,837 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Jama Connect

OpenText Application Qualit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Jama Connect and OpenText Application Quality Management compete in the requirements management and quality assurance category. OpenText often has the upper hand due to its extensive features tailored for software development processes.

Features: Jama Connect offers collaborative features, real-time traceability, and an agile project management focus. OpenText provides comprehensive test management capabilities, emphasizing automation and defect tracking, crucial for complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: Jama Connect could enhance its testing modules, user interface, and integration capabilities. OpenText may benefit from streamlining its deployment process, improving resource requirements, and offering detailed cost breakdowns to better match its extensive functionalities with a transparent value proposition.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText's deployment can be more complex due to its wide range of tools, though customer service is responsive. Jama Connect provides a smoother deployment experience and is supported by efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Jama Connect is cost-effective with lower setup costs, appealing to those needing robust requirements management. OpenText, while demanding a higher initial investment, offers significant ROI for those requiring exhaustive quality management and testing functions.

To learn more, read our detailed Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (5th)

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 3.3%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.5%
Jama Connect	3.3%
Other	88.2%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Juergen Albrecht

Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH

Has required better change management and easier tool integration but supports certification needs and strong collaboration

The visualization tools are nearly similar, so it does not matter if you use DNG or even Jama Connect, but at Jama Connect, the selection and setup for running complex scripts is very powerful and fast compared to IBM, which is sometimes very slow due to the complex software which has lost focus on usability. The collaboration capabilities of Jama Connect are fantastic, and when comparing IBM, PTC, and Jama Connect, they are nearly equal because all three have recognized the importance of collaboration in today's work environment. The feature that I really appreciate about Jama Connect is its allowance for certifications through the FAA and FDA organizations in the US, which in the past was not possible for smaller companies because larger ones, such as Boeing and Airbus, often advised against using unapproved tools.

Read full review

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user experience is better than the competition."

"Support has been excellent - an advantage of working with a somewhat smaller vendor interested in making users successful."

"Jama helped our employees, mostly software engineers, to be more aware of where the requirements are and how to determine them, making the visibility more clear so we can better fulfill international standards in our line of work."

"Jama Connect is a good tool for the entire software development cycle."

"Provides suitable tools for managing regulatory requirements."

"In Jama Connect, users have the capability to view and manage all test cases directly within the platform and execute them. The entire product specification, spanning various domains such as electrical, mechanical, software, and testing, is consolidated within Jama Connect."

"The impact that Jama Connect provides for my company overall is significant as it saves a huge amount of time."

"It is good at requirements management and test management, and for day-to-day users, it is very user-friendly."

More Jama Connect pros

"As long as procedures are clear, then anyone can execute the tests."

"We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered."

"It's very scalable, a very robust kind of solution and we recommend it to anyone who's looking for application lifecycle kind of tool."

"Having used the tool before, I like the use of parameters, being able to do exports and reports of the data for monitoring of executions, and the defect management as well. I feel satisfaction in that area."

"ALM/Quality Center is expensive, but it has its value and, in certain cases, the Enterprise edition is way too much, but it is very stable and reliable."

"You can plan your test execution very thoroughly with configurations and setups in the test lab."

"Its a good tool for a perfect software development company where release/project roll outs happen on a planned basis."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is the alignment of the test to the execution and the linking of the defects to the two. It automatically links any issues you have to the test."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

Cons

"I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes and generating reports automatically."

"More automation could speed up workflows, flag errors more timely, and eliminate manual steps."

"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

"There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation."

"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."

"t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information."

"The solution is expensive."

"There are some security concerns with Jama Connect, including two-factor enablement."

More Jama Connect cons

"The only thing I would add is that I was really looking forward towards the new generation filler that was coming."

"As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern."

"Certain applications within this solution are not really compatible with certain applications like ERP. The problem is when we're trying to use these applications or devices, the solution itself doesn't scale."

"It is totally over-priced."

"I think if we're looking at the legacy owned product, I think it's kind of come and gone as far as its ability to do what you need to do in a DevOps world."

"Quality Center's UI is outdated, and it's a little bit slow on the login part and different parts of the application. That's why we're switching solutions. I believe most companies are switching to Octane or something else. Micro Focus should enhance the interface and reports."

"User-friendliness, it requires some time to get used to."

"Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."

"Jama Connect is a little pricy."

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

"If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people."

"It's a perpetual license."

"The cost of licensing depends on the number of VMs that you are running test cases on and it is not cheap."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is very expensive. The price is approximately £2,000 per person, they are too expensive to corner the market."

"If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered."

"I've never been in the procurement process for it. I don't think it is cheap. Some of the features can be quite expensive."

"It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective."

"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."

"Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

28%

Healthcare Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Jama Connect?

I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?

I am currently dealing with all options based on what the customer wants because my goal is not to promote one tool over another, but to identify the customer's problems and decide on the most suit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Jama Connect?

At the moment, from what I hear from clients and from my own use, I would rate Jama Connect between five to six. I have not considered new improvements for PTC Integrity regarding interface, automa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Jama Connect

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs Jama Connect

Compared 11% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs Jama Connect

Compared 8% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Jama Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Orcanos ALM vs Jama Connect

Compared 3% of the time

More Jama Connect Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect

October 2026

Download Jama Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

October 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

Overview

Jama Connect is a requirements and test management platform with robust traceability and a user-friendly interface, providing tools for regulatory compliance and enhanced project tracking within workflows.

Jama Connect offers comprehensive management of requirements, test cases, and change processes. The platform enhances traceability with visibility into documentation and integrates seamlessly for data management in regulated industries. Its real-time dashboard and impact analysis tools help in informed decision-making. Despite some collaboration and interface limits, Jama Connect supports lifecycle management through efficient document and specification tracking, integrating with solutions like Google App Store and Microsoft Azure.

What are the Key Features of Jama Connect?

Traceability: Provides detailed tracking and documentation management.
User-Friendly Navigation: Easy-to-use interface that simplifies workflow.
Test Management: Modular test tools streamline processes.
Integration: Compatible with various data management tools, essential for compliance.
Impact Analysis: Informs critical decision-making.

What are the Benefits and ROI in Using Jama Connect?

Efficiency: Consolidates requirements and test cases to boost productivity.
Regulatory Compliance: Templates and tools ensure adherence to standards.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork across projects.
Real-Time Insights: Dashboards offer immediate data for decision-making.
Lifecycle Support: Manages the full product lifecycle from documentation to validation.

Healthcare and regulated industries utilize Jama Connect to manage requirements and integrate workflows while ensuring compliance. Its features are tailored to support the complex documentation and validation demands of these sectors, improving traceability and lifecycle management.

Jama

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

November 2026

Free Report: Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.