Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Jama and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Jama is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9, while Siemens is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. Jama holds a 16.2% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 14.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Jama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Jama Connect

Read 16 Jama Connect reviews

3,404 Views
2,485 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 14 Polarion Requirements reviews

2,441 Views
2,441 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Jama Connect

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Polarion Requirements and Jama Connect are both noteworthy in the requirements management software sector. Jama Connect tends to have the advantage due to its robust feature set and extensive capabilities, despite higher upfront costs.

Features: Polarion Requirements offers strong link tracing, adaptable integration with developer environments, and effective sequence tracking. Jama Connect provides advanced collaboration, comprehensive traceability, and a robust review module.

Room for Improvement: Polarion could enhance its user interface and expand its documentation management capabilities. More intuitive reporting tools would be beneficial. Additionally, refining the deployment process could improve user experience. Jama Connect might improve its integration with non-standard applications, streamline customization processes, and offer more flexible pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polarion has adaptable deployment with seamless ALM capabilities, allowing integration with various workflows. Meanwhile, Jama Connect's cloud-based deployment model simplifies and accelerates the setup process, contributing to high customer satisfaction levels.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion Requirements is often favored for its lower initial investment and stable ROI. Jama Connect, however, while demanding a higher initial cost, offers long-term value with its extensive features, potentially leading to a better ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (11th)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 16.2%, up from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 14.4%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Lasse Mikkonen

Principal Consultant at Contribyte

Traceability has improved documentation for auditors and regulators

The collaboration feature in Jama Connect could be improved because it is only used by a limited number of people within an organization due to license costs. For broader collaboration that includes departments like marketing and engineering, many still rely on tools like Slack or Confluence. Additionally, there are areas where usability and configurability could be enhanced.

Read full review

Effendy Mohamed

Principal Instrument and Control at Petronas

Positive impact on traceability while user interface and setup require improvement

The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor. The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy. Someone who has a good IT background would be able to use it, but a regular person who just knows more or has always been dealing with Microsoft Word might find it difficult to use that system. Users need skills to work with this solution and also need to have some foundation of why those technical integrations and cross-referencing have to be done in such a way through systematization, which makes it difficult and not straightforward through the visibility of the user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user experience is better than the competition."

"Jama Connect is a good tool for the entire software development cycle."

"It is good at requirements management and test management."

"In Jama Connect, users have the capability to view and manage all test cases directly within the platform and execute them. The entire product specification, spanning various domains such as electrical, mechanical, software, and testing, is consolidated within Jama Connect."

"Provides suitable tools for managing regulatory requirements."

"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."

"The relationship mapping feature is especially helpful, as it allows us to connect different requirements and compliance-related documentation."

"We use Jama Connect mainly for requirements management."

More Jama Connect pros

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"We can easily customize it because of the web services and open APIs. Also, the APIs are available. We integrated Polarion with one of Siemens' products, Teamcenter, which is especially useful for automotive industries. There is an open API for integration with Jira as well, so for me, customization is a strong point."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."

"We worked with the web interface."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"I believe one of the weak points is the reporting side. You must export inter-readable reports from Jama if you do not use the system as a repository for your design history file. Jama is great if you keep it in Jama, but reporting out requires some customization to get it right."

"The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all."

"The solution is expensive."

"The user interface could be modernized and the product lacks project management functionalities."

"There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation."

"I think there's room for improvement, especially with the review process. Reviews should be integrated with requirement evaluation instead of being separate from it. The review should not run parallel to the requirement."

"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."

"More automation could speed up workflows, flag errors more timely, and eliminate manual steps."

More Jama Connect cons

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."

"The platform's review process for the documents could be better."

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."

"If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people."

"Jama Connect is a little pricy."

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"The product's price is high."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

28%

Healthcare Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jama Connect?

I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jama Connect?

The text and diagram handling in Jama Connect could be improved. The formatting is quite tricky, and diagrams don't import sometimes depending on the format. Importing diagrams into a requirement c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?

My main use cases for Jama Connect involve managing our requirements through to test and validation. This includes reviewing the requirements, using the review functionality, and supporting our who...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Jama Connect

Compared 36% of the time

Jira vs Jama Connect

Compared 14% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Jama Connect

Compared 9% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jama Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Codebeamer vs Jama Connect

Compared 6% of the time

More Jama Connect Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 57% of the time

Jira vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 10% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 10% of the time

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 2% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect

August 2025

Download Jama Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

August 2025

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Overview

Jama Connect is a software platform designed for requirements management, risk management, and testing in product development processes. It allows teams to collaboratively define, track, and manage requirements throughout the entire product lifecycle. Jama Connect enables organizations to improve communication, increase efficiency, and ensure compliance with industry standards and regulations.

Jama Connect Features:

Requirements Management: Jama Connect allows you to capture, organize, and trace requirements, ensuring alignment across teams and stakeholders.
Collaboration and Communication: The platform facilitates collaboration and communication among team members, enabling real-time feedback, discussions, and decision-making.
Test Management: Jama Connect supports test case management, test execution tracking, and defect management, helping ensure comprehensive testing and quality assurance.
Risk Management: You can identify, assess, and mitigate risks using Jama Connect's risk management capabilities, promoting proactive risk management throughout the product development lifecycle.
Traceability and Impact Analysis: The platform provides traceability matrices and impact analysis tools, allowing you to understand the relationships between requirements, tests, and other artifacts.
Compliance and Audit Support: Jama Connect helps organizations maintain compliance with industry standards and regulations by providing audit trails, documentation, and version control.

Jama Connect Benefits:

Improved Requirement Collaboration: Jama Connect enhances collaboration among stakeholders, including product managers, engineers, testers, and customers, leading to better alignment and understanding of requirements.
Enhanced Efficiency: The platform streamlines and automates various aspects of requirements management, reducing manual effort and improving efficiency in the product development process.
Increased Product Quality: By ensuring clear and traceable requirements, facilitating comprehensive testing, and proactive risk management, Jama Connect helps improve product quality and reliability.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Efficient requirements management and streamlined collaboration enable faster development cycles and reduced time-to-market for products and solutions.
Regulatory Compliance: Jama Connect's features and capabilities support compliance with industry standards and regulations, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements.
Greater Visibility and Transparency: The platform provides real-time visibility into project progress, status, and potential issues, fostering transparency and enabling informed decision-making.

Reviews from Real Users

Project Management Director, Technology at a real estate company, says that "Jama Connect is a good tool for the entire software development cycle."

Lasse Mikkonen, Principal Consultant at Contribyte, states that Jama Connect “Offers great templates and predefined settings and it has a very good inbuilt test management module”.

Senior Program Manager Software at a manufacturing company, comments on Jama support, “I think the collaboration with Jama is pretty good, and they listen to us and do a lot of customizations for us to make it work better. Hopefully, it would have been the same with any other company. However, Jama provides essentially 24-hour support.”

Jama

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements

July 2025

Free Report: Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.